Google Inc. v. SEVEN Networks, LLC
Filing
63
ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE - Response due by 8/29/2018. Signed by Judge William H. Orrick on 08/21/2018. (jmdS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/21/2018)
1
2
3
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
4
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
5
6
GOOGLE LLC,
Plaintiff,
7
8
9
United States District Court
Northern District of California
ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE
v.
Re: Dkt. No. 48
SEVEN NETWORKS, LLC,
Defendant.
10
11
Case No. 17-cv-04600-WHO
According to the parties’ status report, the Eastern District of Texas has ruled that Seven
12
Network’s first-filed and “mirror-image” infringement complaint should remain in that district.
13
Google has appealed. It appears to me that no matter whether the Federal Circuit rules in favor of
14
Seven Networks on the Petition for Writ of Mandamus, in which case this matter should be
15
dismissed, or whether it grants Google’s Petition, in which case the Eastern District of Texas case
16
would presumably be transferred to this District, there is no need for any action in this case.
17
Accordingly, the parties are ORDERED TO SHOW CAUSE why I should not grant defendant’s
18
motion to dismiss and dismiss this case on the grounds of the first-to-file rule or, in the alternative,
19
stay this case.
20
21
22
23
The parties must respond to this ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE by filing a response, not to
exceed five pages, on or before August 29, 2018.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated: August 21, 2018
24
25
26
27
28
William H. Orrick
United States District Judge
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?