Banneck v. Federal National Mortgage Association

Filing 114

ORDER EXTENDING DEADLINES granting 113 STIPULATION Hearing as to 97 MOTION for Summary Judgment reset for 2/20/2019 02:00 PM. Further Case Management Conference continued to 2/20/2019 02:00 PM. Case Management Statement due by 2/13/2019. Signed by Judge William H. Orrick on 1/4/2019. (jmdS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/4/2019)

1
2
3
4

Stephanie R. Tatar, Esq. (SBN: 237792)
TATAR LAW FIRM, APC
3500 West Olive Ave., Suite 300
Burbank, CA 91505
Tel: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
E-mail: [e-mail]

5
6
7
8
9

Paul B. Mengedoth, Esq.
MENGEDOTH LAW PLLC
20909 N. 90th Place, Suite 211
Scottsdale, AZ 85255
Tel: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
E-mail: [e-mail]

10

Counsel for Defendant Federal National
Mortgage Association

[Additional counsel listed on signature page]

11

ELIZABETH L. MCKEEN (S.B. #216690)
DANIELLE N. OAKLEY (S.B. #246295)
BENJAMIN D. BROOKS (S.B. #314373)
O’MELVENY & MYERS LLP
610 Newport Center Drive, 17th Floor
Newport Beach, California 92660-6429
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]
[e-mail]
[e-mail]
[e-mail]

Counsel for Plaintiff James Banneck
and all similarly situated individuals

12
13
14

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

15

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

16
17

JAMES BANNECK, individually and on
behalf of all others similarly situated,
Plaintiff,

18
19
20
21
22

Case No. 3:17-cv-04657-WHO

STIPULATION AND ORDER
EXTENDING DEADLINES FOR CASE
MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE,
SUMMARY JUDGMENT HEARING,
CLASS CERTIFICATION BRIEFING,
AND ADR

v.
FEDERAL NATIONAL MORTGAGE
ASSOCIATION,
Defendant.

23
24
25
26
27
28
1

STIPULATION EXTENDING
CASE DEADLINES
3:17-CV-04657-WHO

1
2
3
4
5

Plaintiff James Banneck and defendant Federal National Mortgage Association (“Fannie
Mae”) hereby stipulate as follows:
WHEREAS, a case management conference and the hearing on Fannie Mae’s motion for
summary judgment are currently scheduled for January 9, 2019;
WHEREAS, the parties have cited opinions from Zabriskie v. Federal National Mortgage

6

Association, No. 13-cv-02260 (D. Ariz.), which was subsequently appealed to the Ninth Circuit

7

as Zabriskie v. Federal National Mortgage Association, No. 17-16000 (9th Cir.), in their briefing

8

on Fannie Mae’s motion for summary judgment;

9
10

WHEREAS, on December 26, 2018, the Ninth Circuit entered an order under seal in
Zabriskie, No. 17-16000 (9th Cir. Dec. 26, 2018) (Dkt. 67);

11

WHEREAS, the Zabriskie parties are not permitted to disclose the content of the

12

December 26, 2018 order, but the parties expect the Ninth Circuit to file publicly its decision in

13

Zabriskie in the near future;

14

WHEREAS, the parties agree that the case management conference and hearing on Fannie

15

Mae’s motion for summary judgment should be held after the Ninth Circuit files its decision in

16

Zabriskie;

17

WHEREAS, the parties further agree that class certification should be briefed after the

18

hearing on Fannie Mae’s motion for summary judgment, and that ADR should be completed after

19

the Court rules on plaintiff’s anticipated motion for class certification;

20

WHEREAS, the requested extension is not to unduly delay the prosecution of this action,

21

but to provide the Court with argument and briefing that will permit a just and efficient

22

determination of the issues raised in Fannie Mae’s motion for summary judgment and plaintiff’s

23

anticipated motion for class certification;

24

THEREFORE, pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 6(b), Civil L.R. 7-7(b), and Civil L.R. 6-2(a),

25

the parties stipulate and respectfully request that the Court enter an Order extending certain

26

deadlines in this case as follows; no other existing deadlines will be altered:

27
28
2

STIPULATION EXTENDING
CASE DEADLINES
3:17-CV-04657-WHO

1
2
3
4
5
6

Event
Case management conference and hearing on
Fannie Mae’s motion for summary judgment
Plaintiff’s motion for class certification
Defendant’s opposition to class certification
Plaintiff’s reply in support of class
certification
Hearing on plaintiff’s motion for class
certification
Deadline to complete ADR

7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27

Deadline
February 20, 2019 or as ordered by the Court
March 1, 2019
April 10, 2019
April 24, 2019
May 8, 2019 or as ordered by the Court
July 15, 2019

Respectfully submitted,
Dated: January 3, 2019

Dated: January 3, 2019

FRANCIS & MAILMAN, P.C.

O’MELVENY & MYERS LLP

/s/ James A. Francis
JAMES A. FRANCIS
JOHN SOUMILAS
LAUREN KW BRENNAN
Land Title Building, 19th Floor
100 South Broad Street
Philadelphia, PA 19110
[phone]

/s/ Danielle N. Oakley
ELIZABETH L. MCKEEN
DANIELLE N. OAKLEY
BENJAMIN D. BROOKS
610 Newport Center Drive, 17th Floor
Newport Beach, California 92660-6429
[phone]
Attorneys for Defendant

TATAR LAW FIRM, APC
STEPHANIE R. TATAR
3500 West Olive Ave., Suite 300
Burbank, CA 91505
Tel: [phone]
MENGEDOTH LAW PLLC
PAUL B. MENGEDOTH
20909 N. 90th Place, Suite 211
Scottsdale, AZ 85255
Tel: [phone]
GOLDSMITH & ASSOCIATES, LLC
SYLVIA A. GOLDSMITH
20545 Center Ridge Road, Suite 120
Rocky River, OH 44116
Tel: [phone]
KELLY & CRANDALL PLC
KRISTI CAHOON KELLY
CASEY SHANNON NASH
3925 Chain Bridge Road, Suite. 202
Fairfax, VA 22030
Tel: [phone]
Attorneys for Plaintiff

28
3

STIPULATION EXTENDING
CASE DEADLINES
3:17-CV-04657-WHO

1
2
3

Having considered the parties’ above Stipulated Scheduling Order, and for good cause
shown,
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, adopting the foregoing deadlines in this matter.

4
5

Dated:_January 4, 2019

____________________________
WILLIAM H. ORRICK
U.S. DISTRICT COURT JUDGE

6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
4

STIPULATION EXTENDING
CASE DEADLINES
3:17-CV-04657-WHO

1

Attestation

2
3
4

I hereby attest that the other signatories listed, on whose behalf the filing is submitted,
concur in the filing’s content and have authorized the filing.

5
6

O’Melveny & Myers LLP

Dated: January 3, 2019

7
By: /s/ Danielle N. Oakley
Danielle N. Oakley

8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
5

STIPULATION EXTENDING
CASE DEADLINES
3:17-CV-04657-WHO