Contour IP Holding, LLC v. GoPro, Inc.
Filing
274
ORDER granting 273 STIPULATION to Extend GoPro, Inc.'s Time to File Reply as to 262 MOTION to Stay. Reply due by 10/26/2018. Signed by Judge William H. Orrick on 10/18/2018. (jmdS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/18/2018)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
RIMON, P.C.
Karineh Khachatourian (SBN 202634)
karineh.khachatourian@rimonlaw.com
David T. Xue (SBN 256668)
david.xue@rimonlaw.com
Nikolaus A. Woloszczuk (SBN 286633)
nikolaus.woloszczuk@rimonlaw.com
2479 E. Bayshore Road, Suite 210
Palo Alto, CA 94303
Telephone: (650) 461-4433
Facsimile: (650) 461-4433
Attorneys for Defendant,
GOPRO, INC.
8
9
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
10
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
11
SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION
12
CONTOUR IP HOLDING, LLC,
13
14
15
Plaintiff,
v.
GOPRO, INC.,
16
Defendant.
Case No. 17-cv-04738-WHO
JOINT STIPULATION AND ORDER
TO EXTEND GOPRO, INC.’S TIME
TO FILE REPLY IN SUPPORT OF
MOTION TO STAY PENDING INTER
PARTES REVIEW
17
18
19
Pursuant to Civil L.R. 6-1(b), Defendant GoPro, Inc. (“GoPro”) and Plaintiff Contour IP
Holding, LLC (“Contour”), by and through their undersigned attorneys, hereby state and stipulate
20
as follows:
21
WHEREAS, GoPro filed a Motion to Stay Pending Inter Partes Review on September 28,
22
2018 with a noticed hearing date of November 14, 2018;
23
24
WHEREAS, Contour filed its opposition to GoPro’s motion on October 12, 2018;
WHEREAS, absent an extension, GoPro’s deadline to file and serve a reply in support of its
25
motion to stay is October 19, 2018;
26
WHEREAS, the parties have conferred and Contour has agreed to stipulate to GoPro’s
27
requested extension of time to file and serve its reply by 7 days to October 26, 2018;
28
-1JOINT STIPULATION AND ORDER TO EXTEND GOPRO’S TIME TO FILE REPLY ISO MOTION TO STAY
CASE NO. 17-CV-04738-WHO
1
NOW THEREFORE, IT IS STIPULATED AND AGREED that GoPro’s deadline to file
2
and serve its reply in support of GoPro’s Motion to Stay Pending Inter Partes Review is extended
3
to October, 26, 2018.
4
RIMON, P.C.
5
6
Dated: October 17, 2018
By:
7
8
/s/ Nikolaus A. Woloszczuk
Karineh Khachatourian
David T. Xue
Nikolaus A. Woloszczuk
Attorneys for Defendant,
GOPRO, INC.
9
10
11
WINSTON & STRAWN
12
13
Dated: October 17, 2018
By:
14
15
/s/ Matthew R. McCullough
John R. Keville
Erin C. Villasenor
David P. Enzminger
Matthew R. McCullough
Attorneys for Plaintiff,
CONTOUR IP HOLDING, LLC
16
17
18
19
PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED.
20
21
DATED: October 18, 2018
HONORABLE WILLIAM H. ORRICK
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
-2-
JOINT STIPULATION AND ORDER TO EXTEND GOPRO’S TIME TO FILE REPLY ISO MOTION TO STAY
CASE NO. 17-CV-04738-WHO
ATTESTATION
1
2
3
Pursuant to Civil L.R. 5-1(i)(3) regarding signatures, I attest under penalty of perjury that the
concurrence in this filing of this document has been obtained from its signatories.
4
RIMON, P.C.
5
6
Dated: October 17, 2018
By:
7
8
/s/ Nikolaus A. Woloszczuk
Karineh Khachatourian
David T. Xue
Nikolaus A. Woloszczuk
Attorneys for Defendant,
GOPRO, INC.
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
-3-
JOINT STIPULATION AND ORDER TO EXTEND GOPRO’S TIME TO FILE REPLY ISO MOTION TO STAY
CASE NO. 17-CV-04738-WHO
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?