Contour IP Holding, LLC v. GoPro, Inc.

Filing 274

ORDER granting 273 STIPULATION to Extend GoPro, Inc.'s Time to File Reply as to 262 MOTION to Stay. Reply due by 10/26/2018. Signed by Judge William H. Orrick on 10/18/2018. (jmdS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/18/2018)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 RIMON, P.C. Karineh Khachatourian (SBN 202634) karineh.khachatourian@rimonlaw.com David T. Xue (SBN 256668) david.xue@rimonlaw.com Nikolaus A. Woloszczuk (SBN 286633) nikolaus.woloszczuk@rimonlaw.com 2479 E. Bayshore Road, Suite 210 Palo Alto, CA 94303 Telephone: (650) 461-4433 Facsimile: (650) 461-4433 Attorneys for Defendant, GOPRO, INC. 8 9 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 10 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 11 SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION 12 CONTOUR IP HOLDING, LLC, 13 14 15 Plaintiff, v. GOPRO, INC., 16 Defendant. Case No. 17-cv-04738-WHO JOINT STIPULATION AND ORDER TO EXTEND GOPRO, INC.’S TIME TO FILE REPLY IN SUPPORT OF MOTION TO STAY PENDING INTER PARTES REVIEW 17 18 19 Pursuant to Civil L.R. 6-1(b), Defendant GoPro, Inc. (“GoPro”) and Plaintiff Contour IP Holding, LLC (“Contour”), by and through their undersigned attorneys, hereby state and stipulate 20 as follows: 21 WHEREAS, GoPro filed a Motion to Stay Pending Inter Partes Review on September 28, 22 2018 with a noticed hearing date of November 14, 2018; 23 24 WHEREAS, Contour filed its opposition to GoPro’s motion on October 12, 2018; WHEREAS, absent an extension, GoPro’s deadline to file and serve a reply in support of its 25 motion to stay is October 19, 2018; 26 WHEREAS, the parties have conferred and Contour has agreed to stipulate to GoPro’s 27 requested extension of time to file and serve its reply by 7 days to October 26, 2018; 28 -1JOINT STIPULATION AND ORDER TO EXTEND GOPRO’S TIME TO FILE REPLY ISO MOTION TO STAY CASE NO. 17-CV-04738-WHO 1 NOW THEREFORE, IT IS STIPULATED AND AGREED that GoPro’s deadline to file 2 and serve its reply in support of GoPro’s Motion to Stay Pending Inter Partes Review is extended 3 to October, 26, 2018. 4 RIMON, P.C. 5 6 Dated: October 17, 2018 By: 7 8 /s/ Nikolaus A. Woloszczuk Karineh Khachatourian David T. Xue Nikolaus A. Woloszczuk Attorneys for Defendant, GOPRO, INC. 9 10 11 WINSTON & STRAWN 12 13 Dated: October 17, 2018 By: 14 15 /s/ Matthew R. McCullough John R. Keville Erin C. Villasenor David P. Enzminger Matthew R. McCullough Attorneys for Plaintiff, CONTOUR IP HOLDING, LLC 16 17 18 19 PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED. 20 21 DATED: October 18, 2018 HONORABLE WILLIAM H. ORRICK UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 -2- JOINT STIPULATION AND ORDER TO EXTEND GOPRO’S TIME TO FILE REPLY ISO MOTION TO STAY CASE NO. 17-CV-04738-WHO ATTESTATION 1 2 3 Pursuant to Civil L.R. 5-1(i)(3) regarding signatures, I attest under penalty of perjury that the concurrence in this filing of this document has been obtained from its signatories. 4 RIMON, P.C. 5 6 Dated: October 17, 2018 By: 7 8 /s/ Nikolaus A. Woloszczuk Karineh Khachatourian David T. Xue Nikolaus A. Woloszczuk Attorneys for Defendant, GOPRO, INC. 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 -3- JOINT STIPULATION AND ORDER TO EXTEND GOPRO’S TIME TO FILE REPLY ISO MOTION TO STAY CASE NO. 17-CV-04738-WHO

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?