Huang v. Depomed, Inc. et al
Filing
65
STIPULATION AND ORDER re 64 STIPULATION WITH PROPOSED ORDER filed by Depomed, Inc., James A. Schoeneck, August J. Moretti, Arthur Joseph Higgins. Signed by Judge Jon S. Tigar on April 9, 2018. (wsn, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/9/2018)
1
Michael A. Mugmon (SBN: 251958)
michael.mugmon@wilmerhale.com
Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr LLP
950 Page Mill Road
Palo Alto, CA 94304
Telephone: +1 650 858 6000
Facsimile: +1 650 858 6100
Adam C. McCall (SBN 302130)
amccall@zlk.com
LEVI & KORSINSKY, LLP
44 Montgomery Street, Suite 650
San Francisco, California 94104
Telephone: (415) 291-2420
Facsimile: (415) 484-1294
Attorney for Lead Plaintiff
8
Rebecca A. Girolamo (SBN: 293422)
rebecca.girolamo@wilmerhale.com
Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr LLP
350 South Grand Avenue, Suite 2100
Los Angeles, CA 90071
Telephone: +1 213 443 5300
Facsimile: +1 213 443 5400
9
Attorneys for Defendants
2
3
4
5
6
7
10
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
11
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
12
SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION
13
14
INCHEN HUANG, Individually and on Behalf of
All Others Similarly Situated,
15
16
17
18
19
Plaintiff,
vs.
Case No. 3:17-cv-04830-JST
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED]
ORDER
Hon. Jon S. Tigar
DEPOMED, INC., ARTHUR JOSEPH HIGGINS,
JAMES A. SCHOENECK, and AUGUST J.
MORETTI,
Defendants.
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
JOINT STIPULATION
Case No. 3:17-cv-04830-JST
1
Pursuant to Civil Local Rules 7-11 and 7-12, the parties respectfully request that the
2
Court permit Defendants Depomed, Inc., Arthur Joseph Higgins, James A. Schoeneck, and
3
August J. Moretti (collectively, “Defendants”) and Plaintiff Inchen Huang to exceed—by 5
4
pages—the page limitations that would otherwise apply, under Civil Local Rules 7-2 and 7-3,
5
to the following two briefs: (i) Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss the First Amended Complaint,
6
due on April 9, 2018; and (ii) Plaintiffs’ Opposition thereto, due on June 8, 2018. If this
7
request is granted, the page limit for Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss will be 30 pages, and the
8
page limit for Plaintiff’s Opposition will be 30 pages.
9
Defendants sought consent from Plaintiffs for an extended brief because the 98-page
10
Amended Complaint contains claims against four defendants and challenges numerous
11
statements over a 25-month Class Period, and Defendants believe the short extension of the
12
page limit enables a brief that will facilitate the Court’s consideration of the motion. Plaintiffs
13
have agreed to Defendants’ request, provided that Plaintiffs can file an extended opposition
14
brief, if necessary, to address the arguments in Defendants’ extended brief in support of its
15
Motion to Dismiss.
16
17
18
19
20
Neither party has made any prior request to exceed page limitations for any briefing in
this case.
Accordingly, the parties hereby respectfully request that the Court, by signing below,
modify the applicable page limitations, as set forth below:
1.
21
22
23
The page limit for Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss the First Amended Complaint
shall be extended from 25 pages to 30 pages.
2.
The page limit Plaintiffs’ Opposition shall be extended from 25 pages to 30
pages.
24
25
26
27
28
-1JOINT STIPULATION
Case No. 3:17-cv-04830-JST
1
Respectfully submitted,
2
Dated: April 5, 2018
3
By: /s/Rebecca A. Girolamo
Michael A. Mugmon
Rebecca A. Girolamo
4
5
Attorney for Defendants
6
7
Dated: April 5, 2018
LEVI & KORSINSKY, LLP
By: /s/Adam C. McCall
Adam C. McCall (SBN 302130)
8
9
10
WILMER CUTLER PICKERING
HALE AND DORR LLP
Attorney for Plaintiffs
PURSUANT TO THE STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED.
11
12
13
April 9, 2018
Dated: ____________
_______________________________
Honorable Jon S. Tigar
United States District Court Judge
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
-2JOINT STIPULATION
Case No. 3:17-cv-04830-JST
1
SIGNATURE ATTESTATION
2
I am the ECF User whose identification and password are being used to file the foregoing Joint
3
Stipulation and Proposed Order. In compliance with Local Rule 5-1(i)(3), I hereby attest that the
4
other signatories have concurred in this filing.
5
Dated: April 5, 2018
6
7
8
By: /s/ Rebecca A. Girolamo
Rebecca A. Girolamo
WILMER CUTLER PICKERING
HALE AND DORR LLP
350 S. Grand Avenue, Suite 2100
Los Angeles, CA 90071
9
Attorney for Defendants
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
-3JOINT STIPULATION
Case No. 3:17-cv-04830-JST
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?