Huang v. Depomed, Inc. et al

Filing 65

STIPULATION AND ORDER re 64 STIPULATION WITH PROPOSED ORDER filed by Depomed, Inc., James A. Schoeneck, August J. Moretti, Arthur Joseph Higgins. Signed by Judge Jon S. Tigar on April 9, 2018. (wsn, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/9/2018)

Download PDF
1 Michael A. Mugmon (SBN: 251958) michael.mugmon@wilmerhale.com Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr LLP 950 Page Mill Road Palo Alto, CA 94304 Telephone: +1 650 858 6000 Facsimile: +1 650 858 6100 Adam C. McCall (SBN 302130) amccall@zlk.com LEVI & KORSINSKY, LLP 44 Montgomery Street, Suite 650 San Francisco, California 94104 Telephone: (415) 291-2420 Facsimile: (415) 484-1294 Attorney for Lead Plaintiff 8 Rebecca A. Girolamo (SBN: 293422) rebecca.girolamo@wilmerhale.com Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr LLP 350 South Grand Avenue, Suite 2100 Los Angeles, CA 90071 Telephone: +1 213 443 5300 Facsimile: +1 213 443 5400 9 Attorneys for Defendants 2 3 4 5 6 7 10 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 11 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 12 SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION 13 14 INCHEN HUANG, Individually and on Behalf of All Others Similarly Situated, 15 16 17 18 19 Plaintiff, vs. Case No. 3:17-cv-04830-JST STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER Hon. Jon S. Tigar DEPOMED, INC., ARTHUR JOSEPH HIGGINS, JAMES A. SCHOENECK, and AUGUST J. MORETTI, Defendants. 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 JOINT STIPULATION Case No. 3:17-cv-04830-JST 1 Pursuant to Civil Local Rules 7-11 and 7-12, the parties respectfully request that the 2 Court permit Defendants Depomed, Inc., Arthur Joseph Higgins, James A. Schoeneck, and 3 August J. Moretti (collectively, “Defendants”) and Plaintiff Inchen Huang to exceed—by 5 4 pages—the page limitations that would otherwise apply, under Civil Local Rules 7-2 and 7-3, 5 to the following two briefs: (i) Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss the First Amended Complaint, 6 due on April 9, 2018; and (ii) Plaintiffs’ Opposition thereto, due on June 8, 2018. If this 7 request is granted, the page limit for Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss will be 30 pages, and the 8 page limit for Plaintiff’s Opposition will be 30 pages. 9 Defendants sought consent from Plaintiffs for an extended brief because the 98-page 10 Amended Complaint contains claims against four defendants and challenges numerous 11 statements over a 25-month Class Period, and Defendants believe the short extension of the 12 page limit enables a brief that will facilitate the Court’s consideration of the motion. Plaintiffs 13 have agreed to Defendants’ request, provided that Plaintiffs can file an extended opposition 14 brief, if necessary, to address the arguments in Defendants’ extended brief in support of its 15 Motion to Dismiss. 16 17 18 19 20 Neither party has made any prior request to exceed page limitations for any briefing in this case. Accordingly, the parties hereby respectfully request that the Court, by signing below, modify the applicable page limitations, as set forth below: 1. 21 22 23 The page limit for Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss the First Amended Complaint shall be extended from 25 pages to 30 pages. 2. The page limit Plaintiffs’ Opposition shall be extended from 25 pages to 30 pages. 24 25 26 27 28 -1JOINT STIPULATION Case No. 3:17-cv-04830-JST 1 Respectfully submitted, 2 Dated: April 5, 2018 3 By: /s/Rebecca A. Girolamo Michael A. Mugmon Rebecca A. Girolamo 4 5 Attorney for Defendants 6 7 Dated: April 5, 2018 LEVI & KORSINSKY, LLP By: /s/Adam C. McCall Adam C. McCall (SBN 302130) 8 9 10 WILMER CUTLER PICKERING HALE AND DORR LLP Attorney for Plaintiffs PURSUANT TO THE STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED. 11 12 13 April 9, 2018 Dated: ____________ _______________________________ Honorable Jon S. Tigar United States District Court Judge 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 -2JOINT STIPULATION Case No. 3:17-cv-04830-JST 1 SIGNATURE ATTESTATION 2 I am the ECF User whose identification and password are being used to file the foregoing Joint 3 Stipulation and Proposed Order. In compliance with Local Rule 5-1(i)(3), I hereby attest that the 4 other signatories have concurred in this filing. 5 Dated: April 5, 2018 6 7 8 By: /s/ Rebecca A. Girolamo Rebecca A. Girolamo WILMER CUTLER PICKERING HALE AND DORR LLP 350 S. Grand Avenue, Suite 2100 Los Angeles, CA 90071 9 Attorney for Defendants 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 -3JOINT STIPULATION Case No. 3:17-cv-04830-JST

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?