Sweeney v. Evilsizor et al

Filing 13

STIPULATION AND ORDER to Extend Time for Defendants to Respond to Complaint re #12 Stipulation filed by Whiting Fallon Ross & Abel LLP, Daniel Cantrell. Signed by Judge Edward M. Chen on 10/20/2017. (tlS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/20/2017)

S
7
8

Roeca Haas Montes De Oca LLP

R NIA
FO

LI

ER

N

F
D IS T IC T O
R

C

Attorneys for Defendants
DANIEL CANTRELL and WHITING FALLON ROSS
& ABEL LLP

9
250 Montgomery Street, Suite 1410, San Francisco, CA 94104
415.352.0980 Fax [phone]

dwa
Judge E

H

6

RT

5

hen

rd M. C

NO

4

ERED

O ORD
IT IS S

A

3

UNIT
ED

2

RUSSELL S. ROECA (State Bar # 97297)
[e-mail]
KYLE MONTES DE OCA (State Bar # 280114)
[e-mail]
AUDREY TAM (State Bar # 305437)
[e-mail]
ROECA HAAS MONTES DE OCA LLP
250 Montgomery Street, Suite 1410
San Francisco, CA 94104
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]

RT
U
O

1

S DISTRICT
TE
C
TA

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

10

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

11

SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION

12
13

Hon. Edward M. Chen

Plaintiff,

14
15

CASE NO. 3:17-CV-04866 (EMC)

JOSEPH SWEENEY,

SECOND STIPULATION TO EXTEND
TIME FOR DEFENDANTS DANIEL
CANTRELL AND WHITING FALLON
ROSS & ABEL LLP TO RESPOND TO
PLAINTIFF’S COMPLAINT (L.R. 6-1(a))

vs.

16

KERI EVILSIZOR, et al.,

17

Defendants.

Previous Response Date: October 20, 2017
New Response Date: November 23, 2017

18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
1

SECOND STIP. EXTENDING TIME FOR DEFENDANTS TO RESPOND TO PLAINTIFF’S COMPLAINT
Case No. 3:17-cv-04866 EMC

1

Pursuant to Civil Local Rule 6-1(a), Plaintiff in pro per JOSEPH SWEENEY

2

(“Sweeney”), on the one hand, and Defendants DANIEL CANTRELL and WHITING FALLON

3

ROSS & ABEL LLP (collectively “Whiting”) on the other hand, by and through their counsel of

4

record, hereby stipulate as follows:

5
6

WHEREAS, SWEENEY and WHITING stipulated to extend time for Whiting to respond
to Sweeney’s complaint to October 20, 2017;

settlement in the underlying family court action pending family court approval, which settlement

9

Roeca Haas Montes De Oca LLP

WHEREAS, good cause exists for this extension as SWEENEY has entered into a global

8

250 Montgomery Street, Suite 1410, San Francisco, CA 94104
415.352.0980 Fax [phone]

7

includes resolution of this pending action;

10
11
12

WHEREAS, an extension for WHITING to respond to SWEENEY’s Complaint will not
alter the date of any event or deadline already fixed by Court order;
NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between the parties hereto

13

through their respective attorneys that WHITING shall answer or otherwise respond to

14

SWEENEY’s Complaint by November 23, 2017.

15
16
17

Dated: October 20, 2017

18

ROECA HAAS MONTES DE OCA LLP
By:

/s/ Russell S. Roeca
Russell S. Roeca
Kyle Montes De Oca
Audrey Tam
Attorneys for Defendants
DANIEL CANTRELL and WHITING FALLON
ROSS & ABEL LLP

By:

/s/ Joseph Sweeney
Joseph Sweeney, Plaintiff in pro per

19
20
21
22
23
24

Dated: October 20, 2017

25
26
27
28
2
SECOND STIP. EXTENDING TIME FOR DEFENDANTS TO RESPOND TO PLAINTIFF’S COMPLAINT
Case No. 3:17-cv-04866 EMC

1

ATTESTATION PURSUANT TO CIVIL LOCAL RULE 5.1

2

I, Russell S. Roeca, hereby attest that I have on file all holographic signatures

3

corresponding to any signatures indicated by a conformed signature (/S/) within this e-filed

4

document. I declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the United States of America that

5

the foregoing is true and correct. Executed this 20th day of October 2017 at San Francisco,

6

California.

7
8

By:

/s/ Russell S. Roeca

Roeca Haas Montes De Oca LLP

250 Montgomery Street, Suite 1410, San Francisco, CA 94104
415.352.0980 Fax [phone]

9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
3
SECOND STIP. EXTENDING TIME FOR DEFENDANTS TO RESPOND TO PLAINTIFF’S COMPLAINT
Case No. 3:17-cv-04866 EMC