Flaugher v. California Department of Motor Vehicles

Filing 11

ORDER ADOPTING 9 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS (denying 4 ) by Judge Alsup. Amended Pleadings due by 12/6/2017. (whalc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/15/2017) (Additional attachment(s) added on 11/15/2017: # 1 Certificate/Proof of Service) (cl, COURT STAFF).

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 7 FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 8 9 DOUGLAS W. FLAUGHER, 11 For the Northern District of California United States District Court 10 12 13 14 15 No. C 17-04886 WHA Plaintiff, v. ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF MOTOR VEHICLES, Defendant. / 16 17 On August 23, plaintiff Douglas Flaugher, proceeding pro se, brought this action against 18 the California Department of Motor Vehicles based on allegations that the DMV provided him 19 with a fraudulent driver’s license. Flaugher also filed an application to proceed in forma 20 pauperis and a motion to appoint counsel (Dkt. Nos. 3–4). On August 28, Magistrate Judge 21 Donna Ryu granted Flaugher’s application to proceed in forma pauperis (Dkt. No. 5). On 22 October 18, Judge Ryu filed a report and recommendations to dismiss this action with leave to 23 amend and to deny the motion to appoint counsel without prejudice (Dkt. No. 9). This action 24 was then reassigned to the undersigned judge. Any objections to Judge Ryu’s report and 25 recommendations were due by November 1. As of the date of this order, Flaugher still has not 26 filed any objection. 27 28 1 The Court has reviewed and hereby ADOPTS IN FULL Judge Ryu’s report and 2 recommendations. Accordingly, Flaugher’s motion to appoint counsel is DENIED without 3 prejudice and this action is DISMISSED. Flaugher may file an amended complaint by 4 DECEMBER 6 AT NOON. 5 6 IT IS SO ORDERED. 7 8 Dated: November 15, 2017. WILLIAM ALSUP UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 9 11 For the Northern District of California United States District Court 10 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?