Nazreen Razzak, v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.

Filing 51

ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFFS' APPLICATION FOR TEMPORARY RESTRAINING ORDER. Signed by Judge Maxine M. Chesney on 03/28/2018. (mmclc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/28/2018)

1
2
3
4

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

5

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

6
7

NAZREEN RAZZAK, ET AL.,
Plaintiffs,

8
9
10

v.
WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A.,
Defendant.

11
United States District Court
Northern District of California

Case No. 17-cv-04939-MMC
ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFFS'
APPLICATION FOR TEMPORARY
RESTRAINING ORDER
RE: DKT. NO. 47

12
13

Before the Court is plaintiffs’ “Ex Parte Application for Temporary Restraining

14

Order” (“Application”), filed March 26, 2018. On March 27, 2018, defendant filed its

15

Opposition.

16

By order filed concurrently herewith, the Court has dismissed plaintiffs’ Second

17

Amended Complaint, and, consequently, plaintiffs cannot establish they are likely to

18

succeed on the merits of the claims set forth therein. See Winter v. Natural Res. Def.

19

Council, Inc., 129 S. Ct. 365, 374 (holding party seeking injunction “must establish,” inter

20

alia, it is “likely to succeed on the merits” of its claim).

21

Accordingly, the Application is hereby DENIED.

22

IT IS SO ORDERED.

23
24
25
26
27
28

Dated: March 28, 2018
MAXINE M. CHESNEY
United States District Judge