Saraswati v. City of Berkeley et al

Filing 108

ORDER APPROVING STIPULATION FOR DISMISSAL OF ENTIRE ACTION WITH PREJUDICE. Signed by Judge Maxine M. Chesney on June 9, 2020. (mmclc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/9/2020)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Ann M. Asiano (SBN: 094891) Sara B. Allman (SBN: 107932) Matthew T. Brand (SBN: 295377) CLARK HILL LLP One Embarcadero Center, Suite 400 San Francisco, CA 94111 Telephone: (415) 984-8500 Facsimile: (415) 984-8599 AAsiano@clarkhill.com SAllman@clarkhill.com MBrand@clarkhill.com Attorneys for Defendant/Cross-Defendant/Cross-Claimant CITY OF ALBANY 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 12 13 14 15 SWAMI SHRADDHANANDA SARASWATI, an individual Plaintiff, vs. CITY OF BERKELEY, CITY OF ALBANY, PACIFIC GAS & ELECTRIC COMPANY, a California registered domestic stock corporation, FRANK L. YEE, MAY L. YEE, and DOES 1100, Inclusive Defendants. Case No. 3:17-CV-04940-MMC STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER FOR DISMISSAL OF ENTIRE ACTION WITH PREJUDICE 16 17 AND RELATED CROSS ACTIONS 18 19 20 IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between the parties through their undersigned 21 counsel that, pursuant to Rule 41 (a) (2) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and the full 22 and final settlement of the entire case, in view of receipt of the settlement proceeds from all 23 Defendants except for Defendant P.G.&E. Corp., 1 the above-captioned action, including all 24 claims, cross-claims, cross-complaints, and counterclaims brought therein, is dismissed with 25 prejudice, each party to bear its own costs and fees. 26 27 28 1 Pursuant to a separate settlement agreement, the Bankruptcy Court retains jurisdiction over the Plaintiff and Defendant P.G. & E. Corp. with respect to any matters related to or arising from that aspect of the global settlement of this action. 216629060.11 1 Case No. 3:17-CV-04940 STIPULATION AND ORDER FOR DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE 1 2 IT IS SO STIPULATED. Dated: June 9, 2020 LAW OFFICES OF SANJAY S. SCHMIDT 3 By: /s/Sanjay Schmidt Sanjay Schmidt, Esq. Attorneys for Plaintiff SWAMI SHRADDHANANDA SARASWATI 4 5 6 7 Dated: June 9, 2020 By: /s/Steven Derby Steven Derby, Esq. Attorneys for Plaintiff SWAMI SHRADDHANANDA SARASWATI 8 9 10 11 Dated: June 9, 2020 12 CLARK HILL LLP By: /s/ Sara B. Allman Sara B. Allman, Esq. Attorneys for Defendant CITY OF ALBANY 13 14 15 DERBY, MCGUINNESS GOLDSMITH LLP Dated: June 9, 2020 16 HARTSUYKER, STRATMAN et al By: /s/ Nairi Paterson Nairi Paterson, Esq. Attorneys for Defendants FRANK L. LEE & MAY L. LEE 17 18 19 20 Dated: June 9, 2020 LAW OFFICE OF SHAWN C. MOORE By: /s/ Lori R. Mayfield Lori R. Mayfield, Esq. Attorneys for Defendant MARVIN GARDENS REAL PROPERTY SERVICES 21 22 23 24 ATTESTATION 25 26 27 Concurrence in the filing of this document has been obtained from each of the individual(s) whose electronic signature is attributed above. /s/ Sara B. Allman Sara B. Allman 28 216629060.11 2 Case No. 3:17-CV-04940 STIPULATION AND ORDER FOR DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE 1 ORDER 2 3 Pursuant to the stipulation of the parties above, the Court hereby dismisses this case with prejudice pursuant to Federal Rules of Civil Procedure Rule 41 (a) (2), each party to 4 bear its own costs and fees. 5 6 IT IS SO ORDERED: 7 June 9, 2020 DATED: ___________________ 8 ________________________________ __________________________ _ _ _ _ Honorable Maxine M. Chesney Honorable Chesney n United States District Court Judge United n Judge d 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 216629060.11 3 Case No. 3:17-CV-04940 STIPULATION AND ORDER FOR DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?