Optrics Inc v. Barracuda Networks Inc
Filing
128
Discovery Order Scheduling meet and confer re 126 Letter, 124 Discovery Letter Brief - Discovery Letter Quashing Subpoena re Nonparty Thoma Bravo LLC. Signed by Magistrate Judge Thomas S. Hixson on 10/23/2019. (rmm2S, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/23/2019)
1
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
2
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
3
4
OPTRICS INC,
Plaintiff,
5
DISCOVERY ORDER
v.
6
7
Case No. 17-cv-04977 RS (TSH)
Re: Dkt. Nos. 124, 126
BARRACUDA NETWORKS INC,
Defendant.
8
9
10
Non-party Thoma Bravo has filed a letter brief moving to quash Optrics’ deposition
United States District Court
Northern District of California
11
subpoena, and Optrics has filed an opposition. ECF Nos. 124, 126. It is evident from the filings
12
that Thoma Bravo and Optrics have not adequately met and conferred. Many of the disputes at
13
issue here, such witness fees, adequacy of service, the date and location of the deposition, what is
14
the right legal entity to serve, and the breadth of the subpoena can commonly be resolved or at
15
least narrowed before asking for Court intervention. There is no indication the parties made a
16
serious attempt to do that. Accordingly, the Court ORDERS as follows:
17
1.
Counsel for Thoma Bravo and Optrics shall meet and confer in person at the
18
federal courthouse at 450 Golden Gate Avenue in San Francisco on October 25, 2019. They shall
19
arrive in courtroom A on the 15th floor by 9:00 a.m., and the Courtroom Deputy will bring them
20
to a conference room where they shall conduct the meet and confer.
21
2.
If this meet and confer does not resolve the disputes over this deposition subpoena,
22
the parties shall file a joint discovery letter brief describing the remaining disputes by noon on
23
October 28, 2019.
24
IT IS SO ORDERED.
25
26
Dated: October 23, 2019
27
28
THOMAS S. HIXSON
United States Magistrate Judge
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?