Thompson v. Sony Interactive Entertainment, LLC et al

Filing 34

STIPULATION AND ORDER RESETTING CMC. Case Management Statement due by 2/22/2018. Initial Case Management Conference set for 3/1/2018 09:30 AM in Courtroom 5, 17th Floor, San Francisco. Signed by Judge Edward M. Chen on 11/15/17. (bpfS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/15/2017)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 SACKS, RICKETTS CASE LLP Luanne Sacks (SBN 120811) lsacks@srclaw.com Michele Floyd (SBN 163031) mfloyd@srclaw.com Jacqueline E. Young (SNB 280374) jyoung@srclaw.com 177 Post Street, Suite 650 San Francisco, CA 94018 Telephone: 415-549-0580 Facsimile: 415-415-549-0640 Attorneys for Defendants Sony Interactive Entertainment LLC and Sony Interactive Entertainment America LLC 9 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 10 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 11 12 13 ROSS THOMPSON, on behalf of himself and all others similarly situated, 14 Plaintiff, 15 v. 16 SONY INTERACTIVE ENTERTAINMENT LLC, a California Limited Liability Company; SONY INTERACTIVE ENTERTAINMENT AMERICA LLC, a California Limited Liability Company; and DOES 1 through 20, inclusive, 17 18 19 20 CASE NO. 3:17-CV-5051 EMC STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER REQUESTING EXTENSION OF CASE MANAGEMENT DEADLINES AND EXTENSION OF DEFENDANTS SONY INTERACTIVE ENTERTAINMENT LLC’S AND SONY INTERACTIVE ENTERTAINMENT AMERICA LLC’S TIME TO RESPOND TO COMPLAINT [N.D. Cal. L.R. 6-1(b) & 6-2] Defendants. 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER CASE NO. 3:17-CV-05051-EMC 1 Pursuant to Local Rules 6-1(b) and 6-2, IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED between and 2 among Plaintiff Ross Thompson (“Plaintiff”) and Defendants Sony Interactive Entertainment 3 LLC and Sony Interactive Entertainment America LLC (collectively, “Defendants”) as follows: 4 1. Defendant Sony Interactive Entertainment America LLC (“SIEA”) was served 5 with the corrected complaint in this action on September 8, 2017. Defendant Sony Interactive 6 Entertainment LLC (“SIE”) was served with the corrected complaint in this action on September 7 12, 2017. 8 2. 9 10 On September 27, 2017, Plaintiff and Defendants filed a stipulation extending Defendants’ time to respond to the corrected complaint to October 20, 2017. The Court entered an order on September 28, 2017 granting the stipulated extension. Dkts. 19, 22. 11 3. To allow time to discuss whether the action may be resolved, Plaintiff and 12 Defendants filed a stipulation on October 12, 2017 extending Defendants’ time to respond to the 13 complaint until November 10, 2017. Dkt. 27. 14 4. The parties are still considering whether the action can be resolved. Accordingly, 15 the parties have agreed to further extend the time within which both Defendants must respond to 16 the Complaint up to and including December 8, 2017. 17 5. Under the current schedule, the initial Case Management Conference is set for 18 December 14, 2017. The corresponding Joint Case Management Conference Statement is 19 currently due on December 7, 2017. 20 21 6. request an eight-week extension of the pending case management deadlines. 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 In order to facilitate the parties’ discussions, the parties have further agreed to 7. The parties therefore stipulate to and respectfully request that the Court enter an order: (1) Extending Defendants’ deadline to respond to the Complaint up to and including December 8, 2017; (2) Extending the hearing date for the initial Case Management Conference to a date convenient to the Court, occurring on or after February 8, 2017; (3) Extending the deadline for the Joint Case Management Conference statement to a date -1STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER CASE NO. 3:17-CV-05051-EMC 1 2 3 convenient to the Court, occurring on or after February 1, 2017. 8. Other than as described above, there have been no other previous time modifications in this action. 4 5 IT IS SO STIPULATED. 6 7 Dated: November 9, 2017 SACKS, RICKETTS & CASE LLP 8 By:/s/ Michele Floyd LUANNE SACKS MICHELE FLOYD 9 10 Attorneys for Defendants 11 12 Dated: November 9, 2017 GERAGOS & GERAGOS 13 14 15 By:/s/ Noah J. Geldberg Mark J. Geragos Noah J. Geldberg Attorneys for Plaintiff and the Proposed Class 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 -2STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER CASE NO. 3:17-CV-05051-EMC 1 I, Michelle Floyd, hereby attest, pursuant to N.D. Cal. Local Rule 5-1(i)(3), that the concurrence 2 to the filing of this document has been obtained from each signatory hereto. 3 4 Dated: November 9, 2017 SACKS, RICKETTS & CASE LLP 5 By:/s/ Michele Floyd MICHELE FLOYD Attorneys for Defendants 6 7 8 9 PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED: 10 1. 11 to and including December 8, 2017. 3. 15 16 before: _______________. 2/22/18 S Dated: UNIT ED 18 RT U O 17 S DISTRICT TE C TA Hon. Edward M. Chen ED UNITED STATES ORDER JUDGE SO DISTRICT 11/15/17 19 20 IT IS IFIED S MOD A RT dwa Judge E ER H 22 23 24 hen rd M. C NO 21 R NIA 14 3/1/18 at 9:30 The initial Case Management Conference will be held on: _________________. a.m. The parties shall file their Joint Case Management Conference Statement on or FO 2. LI 13 Entertainment America LLC’s deadline to respond to the Complaint in this action is extended up A 12 Defendants Sony Interactive Entertainment LLC and Sony Interactive N F D IS T IC T O R C 25 26 27 28 -3STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER CASE NO. 3:17-CV-05051-EMC

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?