Thompson v. Sony Interactive Entertainment, LLC et al
Filing
34
STIPULATION AND ORDER RESETTING CMC. Case Management Statement due by 2/22/2018. Initial Case Management Conference set for 3/1/2018 09:30 AM in Courtroom 5, 17th Floor, San Francisco. Signed by Judge Edward M. Chen on 11/15/17. (bpfS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/15/2017)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
SACKS, RICKETTS CASE LLP
Luanne Sacks (SBN 120811)
lsacks@srclaw.com
Michele Floyd (SBN 163031)
mfloyd@srclaw.com
Jacqueline E. Young (SNB 280374)
jyoung@srclaw.com
177 Post Street, Suite 650
San Francisco, CA 94018
Telephone: 415-549-0580
Facsimile:
415-415-549-0640
Attorneys for Defendants Sony Interactive
Entertainment LLC and Sony Interactive
Entertainment America LLC
9
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
10
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
11
12
13
ROSS THOMPSON, on behalf of himself and
all others similarly situated,
14
Plaintiff,
15
v.
16
SONY INTERACTIVE ENTERTAINMENT
LLC, a California Limited Liability Company;
SONY INTERACTIVE ENTERTAINMENT
AMERICA LLC, a California Limited
Liability Company; and DOES 1 through 20,
inclusive,
17
18
19
20
CASE NO. 3:17-CV-5051 EMC
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED]
ORDER REQUESTING EXTENSION
OF CASE MANAGEMENT DEADLINES
AND EXTENSION OF DEFENDANTS
SONY INTERACTIVE
ENTERTAINMENT LLC’S AND SONY
INTERACTIVE ENTERTAINMENT
AMERICA LLC’S TIME TO RESPOND
TO COMPLAINT
[N.D. Cal. L.R. 6-1(b) & 6-2]
Defendants.
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER
CASE NO. 3:17-CV-05051-EMC
1
Pursuant to Local Rules 6-1(b) and 6-2, IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED between and
2
among Plaintiff Ross Thompson (“Plaintiff”) and Defendants Sony Interactive Entertainment
3
LLC and Sony Interactive Entertainment America LLC (collectively, “Defendants”) as follows:
4
1.
Defendant Sony Interactive Entertainment America LLC (“SIEA”) was served
5
with the corrected complaint in this action on September 8, 2017. Defendant Sony Interactive
6
Entertainment LLC (“SIE”) was served with the corrected complaint in this action on September
7
12, 2017.
8
2.
9
10
On September 27, 2017, Plaintiff and Defendants filed a stipulation extending
Defendants’ time to respond to the corrected complaint to October 20, 2017. The Court entered
an order on September 28, 2017 granting the stipulated extension. Dkts. 19, 22.
11
3.
To allow time to discuss whether the action may be resolved, Plaintiff and
12
Defendants filed a stipulation on October 12, 2017 extending Defendants’ time to respond to the
13
complaint until November 10, 2017. Dkt. 27.
14
4.
The parties are still considering whether the action can be resolved. Accordingly,
15
the parties have agreed to further extend the time within which both Defendants must respond to
16
the Complaint up to and including December 8, 2017.
17
5.
Under the current schedule, the initial Case Management Conference is set for
18
December 14, 2017. The corresponding Joint Case Management Conference Statement is
19
currently due on December 7, 2017.
20
21
6.
request an eight-week extension of the pending case management deadlines.
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
In order to facilitate the parties’ discussions, the parties have further agreed to
7.
The parties therefore stipulate to and respectfully request that the Court enter an
order:
(1) Extending Defendants’ deadline to respond to the Complaint up to and including
December 8, 2017;
(2) Extending the hearing date for the initial Case Management Conference to a date
convenient to the Court, occurring on or after February 8, 2017;
(3) Extending the deadline for the Joint Case Management Conference statement to a date
-1STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER
CASE NO. 3:17-CV-05051-EMC
1
2
3
convenient to the Court, occurring on or after February 1, 2017.
8.
Other than as described above, there have been no other previous time
modifications in this action.
4
5
IT IS SO STIPULATED.
6
7
Dated: November 9, 2017
SACKS, RICKETTS & CASE LLP
8
By:/s/ Michele Floyd
LUANNE SACKS
MICHELE FLOYD
9
10
Attorneys for Defendants
11
12
Dated: November 9, 2017
GERAGOS & GERAGOS
13
14
15
By:/s/ Noah J. Geldberg
Mark J. Geragos
Noah J. Geldberg
Attorneys for Plaintiff and the Proposed Class
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
-2STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER
CASE NO. 3:17-CV-05051-EMC
1
I, Michelle Floyd, hereby attest, pursuant to N.D. Cal. Local Rule 5-1(i)(3), that the concurrence
2
to the filing of this document has been obtained from each signatory hereto.
3
4
Dated: November 9, 2017
SACKS, RICKETTS & CASE LLP
5
By:/s/ Michele Floyd
MICHELE FLOYD
Attorneys for Defendants
6
7
8
9
PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED:
10
1.
11
to and including December 8, 2017.
3.
15
16
before: _______________.
2/22/18
S
Dated:
UNIT
ED
18
RT
U
O
17
S DISTRICT
TE
C
TA
Hon. Edward M. Chen
ED
UNITED STATES ORDER JUDGE
SO DISTRICT
11/15/17
19
20
IT IS
IFIED
S MOD
A
RT
dwa
Judge E
ER
H
22
23
24
hen
rd M. C
NO
21
R NIA
14
3/1/18 at 9:30
The initial Case Management Conference will be held on: _________________.
a.m.
The parties shall file their Joint Case Management Conference Statement on or
FO
2.
LI
13
Entertainment America LLC’s deadline to respond to the Complaint in this action is extended up
A
12
Defendants Sony Interactive Entertainment LLC and Sony Interactive
N
F
D IS T IC T O
R
C
25
26
27
28
-3STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER
CASE NO. 3:17-CV-05051-EMC
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?