Infante v. Luxottica Retail North America
ORDER DENYING PRO HAC VICE APPLICATION OF ATTORNEY ANDREW FRIEDMAN by Hon. William Alsup denying 8 Motion for Pro Hac Vice.(whalc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/15/2017)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
For the Northern District of California
United States District Court
KATHLEEN INFANTE, as an individual
and on behalf of all others similarly
ORDER DENYING PRO
HAC VICE APPLICATION
OF ATTORNEY ANDREW
No. C 17-05145 WHA
The pro hac vice application of Attorney Andrew Friedman (Dkt. No. 8) is DENIED for
failing to comply with Local Rule 11-3. The local rule requires that an applicant certify that “he
or she is an active member in good standing of the bar of a United States Court or of the highest
court of another State or the District of Columbia, specifying such bar” (emphasis added).
Filling out the pro hac vice form from the district court website such that it only identifies the
state of bar membership — such as “the bar of the District of Columbia” — is inadequate under
the local rule because it fails to identify a specific court. While the application fee does not need
to be paid again, the application cannot be processed until a corrected form is submitted.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated: September 15, 2017.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?