Regents of University of California et al v. United States Department of Homeland Security et al
Filing
100
FURTHER CASE MANAGEMENT ORDER RE MOTION SCHEDULE Signed by Judge Alsup on 10/25/2017. (whalc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/25/2017)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
8
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
9
11
For the Northern District of California
United States District Court
10
12
13
THE REGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF
CALIFORNIA and JANET NAPOLITANO,
in her official capacity as President of the
University of California,
Plaintiffs,
14
15
No. C 17-05211 WHA
No. C 17-05235 WHA
No. C 17-05329 WHA
No. C 17-05380 WHA
No. C 17-05813 WHA
v.
18
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF
HOMELAND SECURITY and ELAINE
DUKE, in her official capacity as Acting
Secretary of the Department of Homeland
Security,
19
Defendants.
16
17
FURTHER CASE
MANAGEMENT ORDER RE
MOTION SCHEDULE
/
20
21
The recent stay by our court of appeals exempted therefrom any motion to dismiss and
22
motion for provisional relief. The briefing and hearing schedule previously established will
23
remain in place but will be limited to motions to dismiss and motions for provisional relief. For
24
now, the administrative record must be limited to the submission made by defendants on
25
October 6. If our court of appeals requires expansion of the administrative record, then
26
supplemental briefing on the motion to dismiss and motion for provisional relief will, of course,
27
be allowed. In addition to the administrative record, plaintiffs may support their motion for
28
1
provisional relief with declarations and exhibits (but, due to the stay, may not conduct discovery
2
to obtain such evidence).
3
4
IT IS SO ORDERED.
5
6
Dated: October 25, 2017.
WILLIAM ALSUP
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
7
8
9
11
For the Northern District of California
United States District Court
10
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?