Regents of University of California et al v. United States Department of Homeland Security et al

Filing 100

FURTHER CASE MANAGEMENT ORDER RE MOTION SCHEDULE Signed by Judge Alsup on 10/25/2017. (whalc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/25/2017)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 8 FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 11 For the Northern District of California United States District Court 10 12 13 THE REGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA and JANET NAPOLITANO, in her official capacity as President of the University of California, Plaintiffs, 14 15 No. C 17-05211 WHA No. C 17-05235 WHA No. C 17-05329 WHA No. C 17-05380 WHA No. C 17-05813 WHA v. 18 UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY and ELAINE DUKE, in her official capacity as Acting Secretary of the Department of Homeland Security, 19 Defendants. 16 17 FURTHER CASE MANAGEMENT ORDER RE MOTION SCHEDULE / 20 21 The recent stay by our court of appeals exempted therefrom any motion to dismiss and 22 motion for provisional relief. The briefing and hearing schedule previously established will 23 remain in place but will be limited to motions to dismiss and motions for provisional relief. For 24 now, the administrative record must be limited to the submission made by defendants on 25 October 6. If our court of appeals requires expansion of the administrative record, then 26 supplemental briefing on the motion to dismiss and motion for provisional relief will, of course, 27 be allowed. In addition to the administrative record, plaintiffs may support their motion for 28 1 provisional relief with declarations and exhibits (but, due to the stay, may not conduct discovery 2 to obtain such evidence). 3 4 IT IS SO ORDERED. 5 6 Dated: October 25, 2017. WILLIAM ALSUP UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 7 8 9 11 For the Northern District of California United States District Court 10 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?