Regents of University of California et al v. United States Department of Homeland Security et al
Filing
23
SUPPLEMENTAL ORDER TO ORDER SETTING INITIAL CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE re #22 Order, Set Hearings. Signed by Judge William Alsup on 8/1/17. (dl, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/13/2017)
1
LAST REVISED AUGUST 1, 2017.
2
3
4
5
6
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
7
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
8
9
United States District Court
For the Northern District of California
10
11
12
SUPPLEMENTAL ORDER TO
ORDER SETTING INITIAL CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE
IN CIVIL CASES BEFORE JUDGE WILLIAM ALSUP
13
14
INTRODUCTION
15
16
17
18
The purpose of this supplemental order is to guide the parties on recurring practical
questions that arise prior to trial and to impose certain requirements for the conduct of the
case. Counsel must please read this order and follow it.
SERVICE OF THIS ORDER
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
1.
For cases originating in this Court, plaintiff(s) must serve this order and the order
setting the initial case management conference (along with any other required pleadings) on each
defendant. For cases removed from state court, the removing defendant(s) must serve this order
and the order setting the initial case management conference (along with any other required
pleadings) immediately on each and every party that has previously appeared or that appears
within thirty days after removal. Thereafter, any existing party to the action that brings a new
party into the action must immediately serve a copy of this order and the order setting the initial
case management conference (along with any other required pleadings) on the new party.
1
2
CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE
2.
The parties will please address the standardized items in the court-wide format
3
for the joint case management statement. This is available at the Standing Order For all Judges
4
of the Northern District of California — Contents of Joint Case Management Statements.
5
Please file (electronically or manually depending on your case) at least SEVEN CALENDAR DAYS
6
prior to the case management conference. Each party shall be represented at the case
7
management conference by counsel prepared to address all such matters and with authority to
8
enter stipulations and to make admissions.
9
3.
In the joint statement for the initial case management conference, any law firm
United States District Court
For the Northern District of California
10
with more than fifty lawyers nationwide must submit a specific plan for how it intends, in this
11
case, to provide opportunities to junior lawyers (six years or fewer years out of law school) to
12
argue motions in court, to take depositions, and to examine witnesses at trial. Specific motions,
13
depositions, and junior lawyers must be identified. Please state whether it would be useful to
14
require client representatives to attend the upcoming case management conference where this
15
subject will be discussed.
16
4.
Pursuant to FRCP 26(d), Rule 34 requests may be served more than TWENTY-
17
ONE DAYS
18
served at the Rule 26(f) conference. As soon as a party has notice of this order, however, the
19
party shall take such affirmative steps as are necessary to preserve evidence related to the issues
20
presented by the action, including, without limitation, interdiction of any document-destruction
21
programs and any ongoing erasures of e-mails, voice mails, and other electronically-recorded
22
material.
ELECTRONIC CASE FILING — LODGING HARD COPIES WITH CHAMBERS
23
24
after service of the complaint on a party. The request is considered to have been
5.
In electronic-filing cases, each courtesy copy lodged with chambers pursuant to
25
Civil Local Rule 5-1(e) shall be clearly marked “Chambers Copy — Do Not File” and shall be
26
delivered in an envelope clearly marked with the presiding judge’s name and case number. For
27
the final pretrial conference, please follow Judge Alsup’s Guidelines for Trial and Final Pretrial
28
Conference in Civil Bench/Jury Cases.
2
1
6.
In cases that have been referred to a magistrate judge, each courtesy copy for any
2
matter pending before the magistrate judge (e.g., a discovery motion) shall be delivered in an
3
envelope that (1) is clearly marked with the presiding judge’s name and case number and
4
(2) indicates that it is to be delivered to the chambers of the magistrate judge.
5
7.
Please do not provide courtesy copies for administrative motions, including
administrative motions to file under seal. Please also do not provide courtesy copies for
7
redacted versions of electronically-filed documents. Where a document electronically filed on
8
the public docket is redacted in whole or in part and is also the subject of an administrative
9
motion to file under seal, please provide only a single courtesy copy that is completely
10
United States District Court
For the Northern District of California
6
unredacted. For example, if a party files a partially-redacted version of a motion on the
11
public docket and separately files the unredacted version (with all requested redactions
12
clearly indicated) as part of an administrative motion to file under seal pursuant to Civil Local
13
Rule 79-5, then the filing party should provide a courtesy copy of only the unredacted version.
14
15
SETTING MOTIONS FOR HEARING
8.
Counsel need not request a motion hearing date and may notice non-discovery
16
motions for any Thursday (excepting holidays) at 8:00 a.m. The Court sometimes rules on the
17
papers, issuing a written order and vacating the hearing. If a written request for oral argument is
18
filed before a ruling, stating that a lawyer of four or fewer years out of law school will conduct
19
the oral argument or at least the lion’s share, then the Court will hear oral argument, believing
20
that young lawyers need more opportunities for appearances than they usually receive.
FORM OF SUBMISSIONS
21
22
9.
On summary judgment motions, joint statements of undisputed facts are not
23
required but are helpful if completely agreed upon. Please do not file separate statements of
24
“undisputed facts.”
25
10.
Reply declarations are disfavored. Opening declarations should set forth all facts
26
on points foreseeably relevant to the relief sought. Reply papers should not raise new points that
27
could have been addressed in the opening.
28
3
1
2
3
11.
The title of the submission must be sufficient to alert the Court to the relief
sought; for example, please do not bury a request for continuance in the body of a memorandum.
12.
All submissions filed with the Court shall include on the cover sheet the date and
4
time of the hearing or conference. Counsel should include their facsimile transmission numbers
5
along with their telephone numbers on their papers.
6
7
DISCOVERY
13.
The following paragraphs on discovery provide counsel and the parties with
8
views and guidelines of Judge Alsup so that they can plan accordingly. For good cause, the
9
parties are invited to propose any modifications in their joint case management conference
United States District Court
For the Northern District of California
10
statement. Unless and until modified, however, the following provisions shall supplement the
11
requirements of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and the local rules.
12
14.
In responding to requests for documents and materials under FRCP 34, all parties
13
shall affirmatively state in a written response the full extent to which they will produce materials
14
and shall, promptly after the production, confirm in writing that they have produced all such
15
materials so described that are locatable after a diligent search of all locations at which such
16
materials might plausibly exist. It is not sufficient to state that “responsive” materials will be or
17
have been produced. Such a response leaves open the distinct possibility that other responsive
18
materials have not been produced.
19
15.
In searching for responsive materials in connection with FRCP 34 requests or for
20
materials required to be disclosed under FRCP 26(a)(1), parties must search computerized files,
21
e-mails, voice mails, work files, desk files, calendars and diaries, and any other locations and
22
sources if materials of the type to be produced might plausibly be expected to be found there.
23
The Court has found that certain basic information normally learned by counsel anyway should
24
be made available to the other side at the time of production, as if it were a response to a
25
standing interrogatory, as follows. At the time of the production, the responding party should
26
provide a written list to the requesting party setting forth in detail each specific source and
27
location searched. The list must also identify, by name and position, all persons conducting the
28
search and their areas of search responsibility. The producing party shall also provide a list
4
1
describing the specific source for each produced item as well as for each item withheld on a
2
ground of privilege, using the unique identifying numbers to specify documents or ranges.
3
Materials produced in discovery should bear unique identifying control numbers on each page.
4
16.
To the maximum extent feasible, all party files and records should be retained
5
and produced in their original form and sequence including file folders, and the originals should
6
remain available for inspection by any counsel on reasonable notice.
7
17.
Except for good cause, no item shall be received as case-in-chief evidence if the
8
proponent has failed to produce it in response to a reasonable and proper discovery request
9
covering the item, regardless of whether any discovery motion was made. A burden or
United States District Court
For the Northern District of California
10
overbreadth or similar objection shall not be a valid reason for withholding requested materials
11
actually known to counsel or a party representative responsible for the conduct of the litigation.
12
18.
Privilege logs shall be promptly provided and must be sufficiently detailed and
13
informative to justify the privilege. See FRCP 26(b)(5). No generalized claims of privilege or
14
work-product protection shall be permitted. With respect to each communication for which a
15
claim of privilege or work product is made, the asserting party must at the time of assertion
16
identify:
17
18
(a)
all persons making or receiving the privileged or protected
communication;
19
(b)
the steps taken to ensure the confidentiality of the communication,
20
including affirmation that no unauthorized persons have received the
21
communication;
22
(c)
the date of the communication; and
23
(d)
the subject matter of the communication.
24
Failure to furnish this information at the time of the assertion will be deemed a waiver of the
25
privilege or protection. The log should also indicate, as stated above, the location where the
26
document was found.
27
28
19.
Absent extraordinary circumstances, counsel shall consult in advance with
opposing counsel and unrepresented proposed deponents to schedule depositions at
5
1
mutually-convenient times and places. That some counsel may be unavailable shall not,
2
however, be grounds for deferring or postponing a deposition if another attorney from the
3
same firm or who represents a party with similar interests to that witness is able to attend.
4
Ordinarily, if one side desires a prompt deposition, the other side is expected to agree to dates
5
falling within thirty days of the request. On the other hand, rarely should one side expect the
6
other side to agree to a deposition sooner than seven days of the request.
7
20.
If any objection to a request for materials is overruled, and if the disputed request
8
was due and pending at the time of a deposition, the withholding party or counsel must, at the
9
request of any other party, re-produce all deponents under its control or represented by them for
United States District Court
For the Northern District of California
10
further deposition examination as to any new materials produced in response that are germane
11
to that deponent and must bear the expense of doing so. A party objecting to producing
12
requested materials may not use the existence of its own objections as a basis for postponing
13
any deposition unless such party promptly meets and confers and then, if failing to reach an
14
agreement, seeks to bring a prompt motion for a protective order.
15
21.
Counsel and parties shall comply with FRCP 30(d)(1). Deposition objections
16
must be as to privilege or form only. Speaking objections are prohibited. Under no
17
circumstances should any counsel interject, “if you know,” or otherwise coach a deponent.
18
When a privilege is claimed, the witness should nevertheless answer questions relevant to the
19
existence, extent or waiver of the privilege, such as the date of a communication, who made the
20
statement, to whom and in whose presence the statement was made, other persons to whom the
21
contents of the statement have been disclosed, and the general subject matter of the statement.
22
Private conferences between deponents and attorneys in the course of examination, including a
23
line of related questions, are improper and prohibited except for the sole purpose of determining
24
whether a privilege should be asserted.
25
22.
Deponents and their counsel must make a good-faith effort to prepare for
26
depositions and to refresh witness memories on important matters in the suit about which the
27
witness reasonably should be expected to have knowledge. Deponents who claim to lack
28
recollection during their deposition but who later claim at trial to have had their memories
6
1
refreshed in the interim, may be, among other things, impeached with their previous failures of
2
recollection during their depositions or be subject to preclusion. In preparing deponents,
3
defending counsel shall segregate and retain all materials used to refresh their memories and
4
shall provide them to examining counsel at the outset of the deposition.
5
23.
To the maximum extent feasible, deposition exhibits shall be numbered in a
6
simple manner that will allow the same numbering at trial. In discovery, counsel shall agree on
7
blocks of exhibit numbers to be used by the respective parties. Identical exhibits should not be
8
re-marked, but various versions of the same document, such as copies with hand notes added,
9
should be separately marked if used. See Local Rule 30-2(b)(3).
United States District Court
For the Northern District of California
10
24.
FRCP 26(a)(2)(B) requires disclosure of all opinions, bases, reasons and other
11
information considered by an expert. Counsel shall preserve all drafts of expert reports
12
(partial or complete) and notes and other evidence of communications with experts (or with
13
any intermediaries between counsel and the experts) on the subject of this actual or potential
14
testimony, and shall instruct their experts and any intermediaries to do likewise. These
15
materials, however, need not be produced absent the showing required by FRCP 26(b)(3)
16
and (4).
17
25.
With respect to depositions under FRCP 30(b)(6), the fundamental purpose is to
18
allow a party to notice a deposition by subject matter, thereby requiring the respondent to
19
designate and to produce one or more organization witnesses knowledgeable on the designated
20
topic, a useful procedure when the roles of percipient witnesses controlled by an adverse party
21
are unknown. In some cases, however, counsel routinely appear to notice
22
Rule 30(b)(6) depositions on numerous and wide-ranging topics, including even the basis for
23
“contentions” made by adverse parties. To obviate disputes and to give guidance, these
24
guidelines will be observed:
25
(a)
Without a prior order increasing the limit, a party may seek
26
Rule 30(b)(6) depositions from another party on up to a total of ten subject
27
matters (for the entire case) described with “reasonable particularity.” In framing
28
the subjects, it is normally improper to ask for Rule 30(b)(6) deponents to testify
7
1
concerning the entire basis of a claim or defense. On the other hand, examples of
2
proper subjects, which would require the respondent to find and to produce
3
knowledgeable deponents, include “the time line of research and development
4
leading to the invention in question” or “the efforts undertaken by defendant to
5
locate documents responsive to plaintiff’s document request.” The notice should
6
be directed at discovering percipient facts in the possession of the adverse party,
7
not at forcing a supposed “fact witness” to appear and defend the entire thesis of a
8
claim or defense. If a notice includes an overbroad topic, the overbroad topic
9
shall be unenforceable and may not be later replaced with a proper topic.
United States District Court
For the Northern District of California
10
(b)
Each witness-designee deposed for one half-day or more in a
11
Rule 30(b)(6) deposition shall count as a single deposition for purposes of the
12
deposition limit under FRCP 26 or under any case management order setting a
13
limit on the number of depositions. A corporate designee may, immediately after
14
being deposed on the stated subject, be deposed in his or her individual capacity.
15
Both such sessions shall count together as a single deposition (although they
16
should be separately transcribed). If two designees, to take another example, are
17
interrogated, each for one half-day or more, then they count as two depositions.
18
(c)
If an organization cannot reasonably locate a witness to testify
19
based on personal knowledge, there is no requirement under Rule 30(b)(6) for the
20
organization to “woodshed” or to “educate” an individual to testify on the subject.
21
If the organization does not produce any such deponent, however, the
22
organization may not present case-in-chief evidence at trial or on summary
23
judgment on that topic from any witness it could have so designated.
24
(d)
Rule 30(b)(6) testimony never constitutes an irrebuttable judicial
25
admission. It will normally, however, be evidence admissible against the
26
organization producing the witness. The jury may, upon request, be instructed on
27
the significance of the testimony under Rule 30(b)(6).
28
8
1
26.
If a dispute arises during a deposition and involves either a persistent obstruction
2
of the deposition or a refusal to answer a material question on a ground other than privilege,
3
counsel may attempt to arrange a telephone conference with the Court through the courtroom
4
deputy, Dawn Logan, at 415-522-2020. Any such conference should be attended by the same
5
court reporter recording the deposition.
6
27.
All other requests for discovery relief must first be summarized in a letter no
longer than three pages from the party seeking relief after having met and conferred. Up to
8
twelve pages of attachments may be added. In the letter, counsel should identify themselves in
9
the signature block as “counsel for ___________.” In addition, counsel must state whether the
10
United States District Court
For the Northern District of California
7
parties have met and conferred either in person or by telephone over all the issues in the letter.
11
The letter should be electronically-filed in the official file along with the discovery-dispute
12
requests and responses, as well as any timely letter cancelling the hearing if settlement is
13
reached. (Please note that with all communications with the Court by e-filing, a hard copy must
14
be lodged in the Court’s mail box in the Clerk’s Office on the sixteenth floor in the time frame
15
requested by local rule.) The Court will then advise the parties whether a response, written
16
motion or court hearing will be required. After the hearing, counsel should submit their
17
proposed order (agreed as to form) by e-filing it. This paragraph applies only to cases wherein
18
discovery is being supervised by the district judge rather than by a magistrate judge or special
19
master.
20
21
DISCLOSURES
28.
Apart from discovery, Rule 26 requires certain automatic disclosures and requires
22
them to be made in a timely manner. Under Rule 37(c), untimely-disclosed materials may not be
23
used at trial or on summary judgment unless the delay in disclosure is “harmless” or unless
24
“substantial justification” for the delay is shown.
COMMUNICATIONS WITH CHAMBERS
25
26
29.
Please do not send any letters to the Court (except for requests for discovery
27
conferences, short cover letters for dismissals, orders agreed-upon as to form, or chambers
28
copies of electronically-filed documents). When corresponding with the Court by letter, always
9
1
identify whom you represent. Please do not fax or messenger anything to chambers without
2
advance permission specific to the item. Please e-file all submissions to the Court and make sure
3
a hard copy is lodged in the Court’s mail box in the Clerk’s Office on the sixteenth floor within
4
the time frame requested by local rule.
5
30.
You may contact the courtroom deputy, Dawn Logan (on the sixteenth floor in
6
the Clerk’s Office), at 415-522-2020 with appropriate inquiries. Except for the letters described
7
above, please do not attempt to make contact by telephone or any other ex parte means with
8
chambers staff.
9
United States District Court
For the Northern District of California
10
CROSS REFERENCE TO OTHER STANDING ORDERS AND GUIDELINES
31.
The Court has separate standing guidelines for preparation for the final pretrial
11
conference and trial. In securities cases, the Court has a standing order concerning early notice
12
to class members. They are always available for review at the website for the United States
13
District Court for the Northern District of California at www.cand.uscourts.gov.
14
15
16
Dated: August 1, 2017.
WILLIAM ALSUP
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
10
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?