Maldonado v. Santa Clara County et al

Filing 18

ORDER DISMISSING CASE. Signed by Judge Richard Seeborg on 7/16/18. The deputy clerk hereby certifies that on 7/16/18 a copy of this order was served by sending it via first-class mail to the address of each non-CM/ECF user listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing. (cl, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/16/2018)

1
2
3
4
5
6

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

7

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

8
9

MICHAEL MALDONADO,
Plaintiff,

Case No. 17-cv-05266-RS (PR)

10

v.

ORDER OF DISMISSAL

United States District Court
Northern District of California

11
12

SANTA CLARA COUNTY, et al.,
Defendants.

13
14
15

Plaintiff has failed to comply with the Court’s order to file a second amended

16

complaint. Accordingly, the action is DISMISSED (without prejudice) for failing to

17

comply with the Court’s order, and for failure to prosecute, see Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b).

18

Because this dismissal is without prejudice, plaintiff may move to reopen the action. Any

19

such motion must contain an amended complaint that complies in all respects with the

20

Court’s order dismissing the first amended complaint with leave to amend. (Dkt. No. 14.)

21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28

Plaintiff’s motion for an extension of time is DENIED. (Dkt. No. 17.) The Clerk
shall terminate Dkt. No. 17, enter judgment in favor of defendants, and close the file.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated: July ___, 2018
16
_________________________
RICHARD SEEBORG
United States District Judge