Californians for Alternatives to Toxics v. Schneider Dock & Intermodal Facility, Inc. et al

Filing 31

STIPULATION AND ORDER re 30 STIPULATION WITH PROPOSED ORDER (For Leave To File First Amended Complaint) filed by Californians for Alternatives to Toxics. Signed by Judge Jon S. Tigar on December 18, 2017. (wsn, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/18/2017)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 ANDREW L. PACKARD (State Bar No. 168690) WILLIAM N. CARLON (State Bar No. 305739) Law Offices of Andrew L. Packard 245 Kentucky Street, Suite B3 Petaluma, CA 94952 Tel: (707) 782-4060 Fax: (707) 782-4062 E-mail: andrew@packardlawoffices.com wncarlon@packardlawoffices.com Attorneys for Plaintiff CALIFORNIANS FOR ALTERNATIVES TO TOXICS 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 CALIFORNIANS FOR ALTERNATIVES TO TOXICS, Case No. 3:17-cv-05287-JST STIPULATION FOR LEAVE TO FILE FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT 12 Plaintiff, 13 14 15 16 Hon. Judge Jon S. Tigar vs. SCHNEIDER DOCK & INTERMODAL FACILITY, INC. and RYAN SCHNEIDER, 17 18 19 20 21 Defendants, Plaintiff Californians for Alternatives to Toxics ("Plaintiff") and Schneider Dock & Intermodal Facility and Ryan Schneider (“Defendants”) by and through their respective counsel, hereby stipulate and agree as follows: 22 23 24 25 26 WHEREAS on July 13, 2017 Plaintiff provided David Schneider and Ryan Schneider with Plaintiff’s Notice of Violations and Intent to File Suit (“NOV”); WHEREAS on September 12, 2017 Plaintiff filed its Complaint in this matter (Docket No. 1), setting forth causes of action under the Federal Water Pollution Control 27 28 Act, 33 U.S.C. §§ 1251 to 1387 against only Schneider Dock & Intermodal Facility, Inc. STIPULATION ALLOWING PLAINTIFF TO FILE FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT 1 Case No. 3:17-cv-05287-JST 1 2 and Ryan Schneider; WHEREAS on October 30, 2017, Defendants filed with this Court (Docket No. 15) 3 4 5 6 7 their answer responding to the Complaint; WHEREAS Plaintiff now seeks to amend the Complaint to include David Schneider as an owner of the owner of Defendants’ facility. WHEREAS after a responsive pleading is filed, Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 8 15(a)(2) allows a party to amend its pleading only with the opposing party’s written 9 10 consent or the court’s leave. 11 The parties stipulate and agree as follows: 12 (1) Plaintiff may file a first amended complaint naming David Schneider as an 13 additional Defendant in this matter. 14 15 IT IS SO STIPULATED. 16 Dated: December 18, 2017 Respectfully Submitted, 17 LAW OFFICES OF ANDREW L. PACKARD 18 By: 19 20 21 Dated: December 18, 2017 CANNATA O’TOOLE FICKES ALMAZAN By: 22 23 24 _/s/ Andrew L. Packard________ Andrew L. Packard Attorneys for Plaintiff CALIFORNIANS FOR ALTERNATIVES TO TOXICS /s/Therese Y. Cannata __ Therese Y. Cannata Attorneys for Defendants SCHNEIDER DOCK & INTERMODAL FACILITY and RYAN SCHNEIDER 26 ATTESTATION FOR E-FILING I hereby attest pursuant to Civil L.R. 5-1(i) (3) that I have obtained concurrence in the filing of this document from the other Signatory prior to filing. 27 DATED: December 18, 2017 25 By: /s/ Andrew L. Packard______ 28 STIPULATION ALLOWING PLAINTIFF TO FILE FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT 2 Case No. 3:17-cv-05287-JST 1 2 ORDER APPROVING STIPULATION Good cause appearing to allow Plaintiff to file a first amended complaint, IT IS SO 3 4 ORDERED. 5 6 Dated: December 18, 2018 7 Jon S. Tigar United States District Judge 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 STIPULATION ALLOWING PLAINTIFF TO FILE FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT 3 Case No. 3:17-cv-05287-JST

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?