Wroth et al v. City of Rohnert Park et al

Filing 73

STIPULATION AND ORDER re 72 Stipulation and [Proposed] Order to Change Briefing Schedule and Hearing Date on re 65 Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment filed by Marni Wroth, Christopher Wroth. Signed by Judge Jon S. Tigar on March 14, 2019. (wsn, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/14/2019)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11

John Houston Scott (SBN 72578)
Lizabeth N. de Vries (SBN 227215)
SCOTT LAW FIRM
1388 Sutter Street, Suite 715
San Francisco, CA 94109
Tel: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
[e-mail]
[e-mail]
Izaak D. Schwaiger (SBN 267888)
130 Petaluma Avenue, Suite 1A
Sebastopol, CA 95472
Tel. [phone]
Fax: [phone]
E-mail: [e-mail]
Attorneys for Plaintiffs CHRISTOPHER WROTH
AND MARNI WROTH

12
13

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

14

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22

CHRISTOPHER WROTH and MARNI
WROTH,
Plaintiffs,
v.
CITY OF ROHNERT PARK, DAVID
SITTIG-WATTSON, SEAN HUOT, MATT
HUOT, MIKE WERLE, ERIC MATZEN and
DOES 1-25,

Case No. 3:17-cv-05339-JST
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER
TO CHANGE BRIEFING SCHEDULE AND
HEARING DATE ON DEFENDANTS’
MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT

Defendants.

23
24
25
26
27
28
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO CHANGE BRIEFING SCHEDULE AND
HEARING DATE ON DEFENDANTS’ MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10

SCOTT LAW FIRM

1388 S UTTER S TREET , S UITE 715
S AN F RANCISCO , CA 94109

11
12
13

Pursuant to Northern District Local Rule 6-1, Plaintiffs CHRISTOPHER WROTH and
MARNI WROTH and Defendants CITY OF ROHNERT PARK, DAVID SITTIG-WATTSON,
SEAN HUOT, MATT HUOT, MIKE WERLE, ERIC MATZEN, through their respective
counsels, agree and stipulate as follows:
1.

Defendants’ CITY OF ROHNERT PARK, DAVID SITTIG-WATTSON, SEAN

HUOT, MATT HUOT, MIKE WERLE, ERIC MATZEN filed their motion for summary
judgment on March 1, 2019 (Document 65).
2.

In light of plaintiffs’ attorneys press of business, Plaintiffs and Defendants have

agreed to extend the time for Plaintiffs’ response to Defendants’ motion for summary judgment
from March 15, 2019 to March 22, 2019 and Defendants’ reply to Plaintiffs’ response from
March 22, 2019 to March 29, 2019.
3.

The parties also hereby stipulate and agree that the hearing on Defendants’ motion

for summary judgment be moved from April 18, 2019 to April 25, 2019 at 2:00 p.m.

14
15
16

Respectfully submitted
Dated: March 12, 2019

SCOTT LAW FIRM
By: /s/John Houston Scott______________
John Houston Scott
Attorneys for Plaintiff

17
18
19
20

Dated: March 12, 2019

21

By: /s/Izaak D. Schwaiger _____________
Izaak D. Schwaiger
Attorneys for Plaintiff

22
23
24
25
26
27
28

LAW OFFICES OF IZAAK D. SCHWAIGER

Dated: March 12, 2019

GEARY, SHEA, O’DONNELL, GRATTAN
& MITCHELL, P.C.
By: /s/Raymond J. Fullerton
Raymond J. Fullerton
Attorneys for Defendants
-1-

___

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO CHANGE BRIEFING SCHEDULE AND
HEARING DATE ON DEFENDANTS’ MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT

1
2
3

ELECTRONIC CASE FILING ATTESTATION
I John Houston Scott, am the ECF user whose identification and password are being used

4

to file the foregoing document. Pursuant to Civil Local Rule 5.1(i), I hereby attest that

5

concurrence in the filing of this document has been obtained from each of its signatories.

6
7

Dated: March 12, 2019

SCOTT LAW FIRM

8
9

By: /s/John Houston Scott______________
John Houston Scott
Attorneys for Plaintiff

10
11
SCOTT LAW FIRM

1388 S UTTER S TREET , S UITE 715
S AN F RANCISCO , CA 94109

Respectfully submitted,

12
13

ORDER

14

IT IS SO ORDERED that Plaintiffs’ response to Defendants’ motion for summary

15

judgment from March 15, 2019 to March 22, 2019 and Defendants’ reply to Plaintiffs’ response

16

from March 22, 2019 to March 29, 2019.

17
18

That the hearing on Defendants’ motion for summary judgment be moved from April 18,
2019 to April 25, 2019 at 2:00 p.m.

19
20

March 14, 2019
Date: _________________

21
22
23
24

_______________________________________
THE HONORABLE JON S. TIGAR
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT JUDGE

25
26
27
28

-2-

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO CHANGE BRIEFING SCHEDULE AND
HEARING DATE ON DEFENDANTS’ MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT