Wroth et al v. City of Rohnert Park et al
Filing
79
STIPULATION AND ORDER re 76 STIPULATION WITH PROPOSED ORDER Stipulation and [Proposed] Order to Change Pretrial Conference Hearing Date filed by Marni Wroth, Christopher Wroth. Pretrial Conference set for 5/24/2019 at 2:00 PM in Oakland, Courtroom 2, 4th Floor before Judge Jon S. Tigar. Signed by Judge Jon S. Tigar on April 22, 2019. (wsnS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/22/2019)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
John Houston Scott (SBN 72578)
Lizabeth N. de Vries (SBN 227215)
SCOTT LAW FIRM
1388 Sutter Street, Suite 715
San Francisco, CA 94109
Tel: (415) 561-9601
Fax: (415) 561-9609
john@scottlawfirm.net
liza@scottlawfirm.net
Izaak D. Schwaiger (SBN 267888)
130 Petaluma Avenue, Suite 1A
Sebastopol, CA 95472
Tel. (707) 595-4414
Fax: (707) 581-1983
E-mail: izaak@izaakschwaiger.com
Attorneys for Plaintiffs CHRISTOPHER WROTH
AND MARNI WROTH
12
13
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
14
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
CHRISTOPHER WROTH and MARNI
WROTH,
Plaintiffs,
v.
Case No. 3:17-cv-05339-JST
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED]
ORDER TO CHANGE PRETRIAL
CONFERENCE HEARING DATE
CITY OF ROHNERT PARK, DAVID
SITTIG-WATTSON, SEAN HUOT, MATT
HUOT, MIKE WERLE, ERIC MATZEN and
DOES 1-25,
Defendants.
23
24
25
26
27
28
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO CHANGE PRETRIAL CONFERENCE HEARING DATE
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
Pursuant to Northern District Local Rule 6-1, Plaintiffs CHRISTOPHER WROTH and
MARNI WROTH and Defendants CITY OF ROHNERT PARK, DAVID SITTIG-WATTSON,
SEAN HUOT, MATT HUOT, MIKE WERLE, ERIC MATZEN, through their respective
counsels, agree and stipulate as follows:
1.
The parties hereby stipulate and agree that the Pretrial Conference hearing be
moved from May 10, 2019 to May 24, 2019 at 2:00 p.m.
2.
The parties submit this stipulation and request for the following reasons:
a. Counsel for defendants has trial call scheduled for May 10, 2019 in Sonoma
County Superior Court case number SCV-261504. This scheduled date is the
10
second phase of a bifurcated trial. If the trial commences as scheduled,
SCOTT LAW FIRM
1388 S UTTER S TREET , S UITE 715
S AN F RANCISCO , CA 94109
11
12
13
14
counsel anticipates that it will last through the week of May 13, 2019.
b.
The parties wish to avoid the unnecessary expenditure of time of resources to
prepare for the pretrial conference during the time the court’s order on
summary judgment may still be pending.
15
Respectfully submitted
16
17
Dated: April 17, 2019
18
By: /s/John Houston Scott______________
John Houston Scott
Attorneys for Plaintiff
19
20
21
SCOTT LAW FIRM
Dated: April 17, 2019
LAW OFFICES OF IZAAK D. SCHWAIGER
22
23
24
By: /s/Izaak D. Schwaiger _____________
Izaak D. Schwaiger
Attorneys for Plaintiff
25
26
27
28
-1STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO CHANGE PRETRIAL CONFERENCE HEARING DATE
1
Dated: April 17, 2019
2
3
GEARY, SHEA, O’DONNELL, GRATTAN
& MITCHELL, P.C.
By: /s/Raymond J. Fullerton
Raymond J. Fullerton
Attorneys for Defendants
4
5
______
6
7
8
9
10
SCOTT LAW FIRM
1388 S UTTER S TREET , S UITE 715
S AN F RANCISCO , CA 94109
11
12
ELECTRONIC CASE FILING ATTESTATION
I John Houston Scott, am the ECF user whose identification and password are being used
to file the foregoing document. Pursuant to Civil Local Rule 5.1(i), I hereby attest that
concurrence in the filing of this document has been obtained from each of its signatories.
Dated: April 17, 2019
13
Respectfully submitted,
SCOTT LAW FIRM
14
By: /s/John Houston Scott______________
John Houston Scott
Attorneys for Plaintiff
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
ORDER
IT IS SO ORDERED that the Pretrial Conference hearing be moved from May 10, 2019
to May 24, 2019 at 2:00 p.m.
22
23
April 22, 2019
Date: _________________
24
25
26
_______________________________________
THE HONORABLE JON S. TIGAR
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT JUDGE
27
28
-2STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO CHANGE PRETRIAL CONFERENCE HEARING DATE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?