Fishman v. Tiger Natural Gas, Inc.

Filing 16

Order by Chief Magistrate Judge Joseph C. Spero denying as moot #8 Motion to Dismiss. (jcslc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/11/2017)

1
2
3
4

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

5

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

6
7

EMILY FISHMAN, et al.,

Case No. 17-cv-05351-JCS

Plaintiffs,
8
v.

ORDER DENYING AS MOOT MOTION
TO DISMISS

9
10

TIGER NATURAL GAS, INC., et al.,

Re: Dkt. No. 8

Defendants.

United States District Court
Northern District of California

11
12

Defendant Tiger Natural Gas, Inc. (“Tiger”) moved to dismiss Plaintiff Emily Fishman’s

13

initial complaint. See Mot. to Dismiss (dkt. 8). Fishman has since filed an amended complaint

14

pursuant to Rule 15(a)(1)(B) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. See 1st Am. Class Action

15

Compl. (dkt. 13). Because the amended complaint supersedes the previous complaint, Tiger’s

16

motion to dismiss the original complaint is DENIED AS MOOT, without prejudice to any

17

argument that any defendant might raise in response to the amended complaint.

18
19
20
21

22
23
24
25
26
27
28

IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated: October 11, 2017
______________________________________
JOSEPH C. SPERO
Chief Magistrate Judge