Skiles v. Tesla, Inc. et al

Filing 32

STIPULATION AND ORDER re 30 STIPULATION WITH PROPOSED ORDER [JOINT] Stipulation and Proposed Order for Extension of Time to Respond filed by Experian Information Solutions, Inc. Signed by Judge William H. Orrick on October 13, 2017. (wsn, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/13/2017)

1
2
3
4

John A. Vogt (State Bar No. 198677)
JONES DAY
3161 Michelson Drive, Suite 800
Irvine, California 92612
(T) 949.851.3939
(F) 949.553.7539
[e-mail]

5
6

Attorneys for Defendant
Experian Information Solutions, Inc.

7
8

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10
11

WAYNE SKILES, individually and on behalf
of all others similarly situated,

Assigned to: Judge William H. Orrick
Plaintiff,

12

15

JOINT STIPULATION AND ORDER
FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO
RESPOND TO COMPLAINT

v.

13
14

Case No. 3:17-cv-05434-WHO

TESLA, INC. f/k/a TESLA MOTORS, INC.,
EXPERIAN INFORMATION SOLUTIONS,
INC., APPSTEM MEDIA LLC, and
SALESFORCE VENTURES, LLC,

16

Defendants.

17
18
19

On September 26, 2017, Plaintiff Wayne Skiles served Experian Information Solutions,

20

Inc. with the Complaint in this matter. In accordance with Local Rule 6-1, Skiles and Experian

21

have agreed to extend the time for Experian to answer or otherwise respond to the Complaint to

22

December 5, 2017. To the extent that Experian files a motion to dismiss in this case, Experian

23

agrees that Plaintiff shall have 42 days to respond. Experian will thereupon have 28 days for any

24

reply.

25

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between Skiles and Experian, that

26

the deadline for Experian to answer or otherwise respond to the Complaint is extended until

27

December 5, 2017, Plaintiff’s deadline to respond to any motion to dismiss is extended to 42 days

28

from filing, and Experian’s deadline to reply in support of a motion to dismiss is extended to 28
JOINT STIPULATION FOR EXTENSION
OF TIME TO RESPOND TO COMPLAINT
Case No. 3:17-cv-05434-WHO

1

days from filing the opposition.

2

Dated: October 13, 2017

3
4
5
6
7

/s/ Jason Ibey
Jason Ibey, Esq.
KAZEROUNI LAW GROUP, APC
A Professional Corporation
245 Fischer Avenue, Suite D1
Costa Mesa, California 92626
(T) 800-400-6808 Ext: 6
(F) 800-520-5523
[e-mail]
Attorneys for Plaintiff
Wayne Skiles

8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15

Dated: October 13, 2017

/s/ John A. Vogt
John A. Vogt
JONES DAY
3161 Michelson Drive, Suite 800
Irvine, California 92612
(T) 949.851.3939
(F) 949.553.7539
[e-mail]
Attorneys for Defendant
Experian Information Solutions, Inc.

16
17
18
19
20

ECF CERTIFICATION
I, John A. Vogt, hereby attest pursuant to Civil Local Rule 5.1(i) that the concurrence to
the filing of this document has been obtained from each signatory hereto.
Executed October 13, 2017, at Irvine, California.

21
22
23
24
25
26
27

s/ John A. Vogt
John A. Vogt
JONES DAY
3161 Michelson Drive, Suite 800
Irvine, California 92612
(T) 949.851.3939
(F) 949.553.7539
[e-mail]
Attorneys for Defendant
Experian Information Solutions, Inc.

28
-2-

JOINT STIPULATION FOR EXTENSION
OF TIME TO RESPOND TO COMPLAINT
Case No. 3:17-cv-05434-WHO

1
2
ORDER

3
4
5
6
7
8
9

The Court, having considered the parties’ Joint Stipulation for Extension of Time to
Respond to the Complaint, hereby extends Experian Information Solutions, Inc.’s deadline to
answer or otherwise respond to the Complaint to December 5, 2017. To the extent that Experian
files a motion to dismiss in this case, Plaintiff shall have 42 days to respond. Experian will
thereupon have 28 days for any reply.
PURSUANT TO THE STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED.

10
11
12
13

DATED: October 13, 2017
The Honorable William H. Orrick
United States District Judge

14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
-3-

JOINT STIPULATION FOR EXTENSION
OF TIME TO RESPOND TO COMPLAINT
Case No. 3:17-cv-05434-WHO