Dytch v. Belkhalfia et al
Filing
25
ORDER GRANTING 24 STIPULATION DISMISSING CASE. Signed by Chief Magistrate Judge Joseph C. Spero on 4/9/19. (klhS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/9/2019)
1
2
3
4
5
6
Tanya E. Moore, SBN 206683
MISSION LAW FIRM, A.P.C.
332 North Second Street
San Jose, California 95112
Telephone (408) 298-2000
Facsimile (408) 298-6046
E-mail: service@mission.legal
Attorney for Plaintiff,
Albert Dytch
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
12
ALBERT DYTCH,
Plaintiff,
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
vs.
JONATHAN K. BELKHALFIA dba
ABIGAIL CAFE AND DELI; SHM
BALLENA ISLE, LLC;
Defendants.
) No. 3:17-cv-05474-JCS
)
) STIPULATION FOR DISMISSAL OF
) ENTIRE ACTION
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
27
28
STIPULATION FOR DISMISSAL OF ENTIRE ACTION
Page 1
1
IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between Plaintiff Albert Dytch and
2
Defendants, Jonathan K. Belkhalfia dba Abigail Cafe, and SHM Ballena Isle, LLC, the parties
3
to this action, that pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(1)(A)(ii), the above-
4
captioned action is dismissed with prejudice in its entirety. Each party is to bear its own
5
attorneys’ fees and costs.
6
7
Dated: April 6, 2018
MISSION LAW FIRM, A.P.C.
8
/s/ Tanya E. Moore
Tanya E. Moore
Attorney for Plaintiff,
Francisca Moralez
9
10
11
12
Dated: April 6, 2018
LAW OFFICE OF RICHARD H. POULSON
13
/s/ Richard H. Poulson
Richard H. Poulson
Attorney for Defendants,
Jonathan K. Belkhalfia dba Abigail Cafe
14
15
16
17
Dated: April 11, 2018
GORDON REES SCULLY
MANSUKHANI, LLP
Dated: April 9, 2019
/s/ Michael A. Dubin
Michael A. Dubin
Michael D. Bruno
Attorneys for Defendant,
SHM Ballena Isle, LLC
18
19
R NIA
LI
ER
FO
Spero
H
26
seph C.
Judge Jo
RT
25
ERED
O ORD
IT IS S
NO
24
UNIT
ED
23
ISTRIC
ES D
TC
AT
T
RT
U
O
22
S
21
A
20
N
F
D IS T IC T O
R
C
27
28
STIPULATION FOR DISMISSAL OF ENTIRE ACTION
Page 2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?