Hardin v. Mendocino Coast District Hospital et al

Filing 27

STIPULATION AND ORDER re 26 STIPULATION WITH PROPOSED ORDER to Extend Time to Respond to Complaint filed by Steve Lund, Wade Sturgeon, Bob Edwards, Mendocino Coast District Hospital. Case Management Statement due 3/26/2018 by 5:00 PM. Initial Case Management Conference set for 4/4/2018 at 2:00 PM in San Francisco, Courtroom 9, 19th Floor. Signed by Judge Jon S. Tigar on January 29, 2018. (wsn, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/29/2018)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 FLETCHER C. ALFORD (SBN: 152314) falford@grsm.com RYAN B. POLK (SBN: 230769) rpolk@grsm.com GORDON REES SCULLY MANSUKHANI, LLP 275 Battery Street, Suite 2000 San Francisco, CA 94111 Telephone: (415) 875-3115 Facsimile: (415) 986-8054 Attorneys for Defendants MENDOCINO COAST DISTRICT HOSPITAL, BOB EDWARDS, STEVE LUND AND WADE STURGEON 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani, LLP 275 Battery Street, Suite 2000 San Francisco, CA 94111 (SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION) 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 ELLEN HARDIN, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) vs. ) ) MENDOCINO COAST DISTRICT HOSPITAL, a ) government entity or agency, exact form unknown; BOB EDWARDS, an individual; STEVE LUND, an ) individual; WADE STURGEON, an individual; and ) ) DOES 1 through 50, Inclusive, ) ) Defendants. CASE NO. 17-cv-05554-JST STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME TO RESPOND TO COMPLAINT; [PROPOSED] ORDER Complaint Filed: 09/25/17 Pursuant to Civ. L.R. 6-1(b) and 6-2, Defendants Mendocino Coast District Hospital, Bob 20 Edwards, Steve Lund and Wade Sturgeon (“Defendants”) and Plaintiff Ellen Hardin 21 (“Plaintiff”), by and through their respective counsel of record, hereby stipulate as follows: 22 WHEREAS, Defendants agree that its counsel Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani LLP will 23 accept service via email of the Summons and Complaint for all Defendants. The Summons and 24 Complaint shall be emailed by Monday January 29, 2018. 25 26 27 28 WHEREAS, all Defendants currently have until on or about January 26, 2018 to answer or respond to Plaintiff’s Complaint; WHEREAS, Defendants have requested, and Plaintiff has consented to an extension of -1STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME TO RESPOND TO COMPLAINT; [PROPOSED] ORDER 1 2 3 4 time for Defendants to answer or respond to Plaintiff’s Complaint to February 26, 2018; WHEREAS, there have been no previous time modifications requested by the parties in this action; WHEREAS, the extension of time for Defendants to answer or respond to Plaintiff’s 5 Complaint will necessitate the rescheduling of the Initial Case Management Conference, which 6 is currently set for March 7, 2018 (with the Case Management Statement presently due on 7 February 26, 2018 – the same day as the proposed deadline to answer or respond to the 8 Complaint); NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between the parties, 10 Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani, LLP 275 Battery Street, Suite 2000 San Francisco, CA 94111 9 through their respective counsel, that Defendants shall answer or otherwise respond to Plaintiff’s 11 Complaint by February 26, 2018. 12 13 Dated: January 26, 2018 14 GORDON REES SCULLY MANSUKHANI, LLP 15 By: 16 17 18 19 20 Dated: January 26, 2018 /s/ Ryan B. Polk Fletcher C. Alford Ryan B. Polk Attorneys for Defendants MENDOCINO COAST DISTRICT HOSPITAL, BOB EDWARDS, STEVE LUND AND WADE STURGEON LAW OFFICE OF TWILA S. WHITE 21 22 By: 23 24 /s/ Twila S. White Twila S White Attorney for Plaintiff ELLEN HARDIN 25 26 27 28 -2STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME TO RESPOND TO COMPLAINT; [PROPOSED] ORDER 1 [PROPOSED] ORDER 2 PURSUANT TO THE FOREGOING STIPULATION OF THE PARTIES, IT IS 3 ORDERED THAT Defendants shall answer or otherwise respond to Plaintiff’s Complaint by 4 February 26, 2018. The case management conference is rescheduled for ___________________. 04/04/2018 5 03/26/2018 The parties’ joint case management statement shall be due on ___________________. 6 7 8 January 29 Dated: _________________, 2018 HONORABLE JON S. TIGAR United States District Court Judge 9 Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani, LLP 275 Battery Street, Suite 2000 San Francisco, CA 94111 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 -3STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME TO RESPOND TO COMPLAINT; [PROPOSED] ORDER

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?