Talsk Research Inc. v. Evernote Corporation

Filing 70

STIPULATION AND ORDER re 69 STIPULATION WITH PROPOSED ORDER of Dismissal filed by Talsk Research Inc. Signed by Judge Jon S. Tigar on January 8, 2018. (wsn, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/8/2018)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11

LEWIS E. HUDNELL, III (Bar No. 218736)
HUDNELL LAW GROUP P.C.
800 W. El Camino Real Suite 180
Mountain View, California 94040
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: 347.772.3034
Email: [e-mail]

DOUGLAS J. KLINE (pro hac vice)
[e-mail]
ROBERT FREDERICKSON III (pro hac vice)
[e-mail]
GOODWIN PROCTER LLP
100 Northern Avenue
Boston, Massachusetts 02210
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: 617.523.1231

WILLIAM CORY SPENCE
[e-mail]
MATTHEW A. WERBER
[e-mail]
SPENCE PC
405 N. Wabash Avenue Suite P2e
Chicago, IL 60611
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: 312.635.2299

BRETT M. SCHUMAN (SBN 189247)
[e-mail]
GOODWIN PROCTER LLP
Three Embarcadero Center, 24th Floor
San Francisco, California 94111
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: 415.677.9041
Attorneys for Defendant,
EVERNOTE CORPORATION

Attorneys for Plaintiff,
TALSK RESEARCH INC.

12
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

13
14

TALSK RESEARCH INC.,

) Case No. 3:17-cv-5576-JST
)
) STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL AND
) PROPOSED ORDER
)
)
)
)
)
)
)

15
Plaintiff,
16

vs.

17

EVERNOTE CORPORATION,

18

Defendant.

19
20
21
22

Pursuant to Rule 41 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, Plaintiff Talsk Research Inc.

23 (“Talsk”) and Defendant Evernote Corporation hereby stipulate and agree subject to and upon
24 the Court’s approval that: (i) all of Talsk’s claims in the action against Evernote Corporation
25

shall be dismissed with prejudice and (ii) each party shall bear its own costs, expenses and

26
attorneys’ fees.
27
28

IT IS SO STIPULATED, THROUGH COUNSEL OF RECORD.

30 Case No. 3:17-cv-5576-JST
STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL AND PROPOSED ORDER

31

1

1
2
3

Dated: January 5, 2018

Respectfully submitted,
/s/ Lewis E. Hudnell, III
LEWIS E. HUDNELL, III (Bar No. 218736)
HUDNELL LAW GROUP P.C.
800 W. El Camino Real Suite 180
Mountain View, California 94040
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: 347.772.3034
Email: [e-mail]

4
5
6
7
8

WILLIAM CORY SPENCE
[e-mail]
MATTHEW A. WERBER
[e-mail]
SPENCE PC
405 N. Wabash Avenue Suite P2e
Chicago, IL 60611
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: 312.635.2299

9
10
11
12
13

Attorney for
TALSK RESEARCH INC.

14
15

Dated: January 5, 2018
/s/ Robert Frederickson III (with permission)
DOUGLAS J. KLINE (pro hac vice)
[e-mail]
ROBERT FREDERICKSON III (pro hac
vice)
[e-mail]
GOODWIN PROCTER LLP
100 Northern Avenue
Boston, Massachusetts 02210
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: 617.523.1231

16
17
18
19
20
21
22

BRETT M. SCHUMAN (SBN 189247)
[e-mail]
GOODWIN PROCTER llp
Three Embarcadero Center, 24th Floor
San Francisco, California 94111
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: 415.677.9041

23
24
25
26
27
28
30 Case No. 3:17-cv-5576-JST
STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL AND PROPOSED ORDER

31

2

1

[PROPOSED] ORDER

2
3
4
5

PURSUANT TO STIPULATION of the parties, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that this
action is dismissed with prejudice. All costs and fees shall be borne by the party that incurred
them.
IT IS SO ORDERED.

6
7 Dated: January 8, 2018
Hon. Jon S. Tigar
United States District Court Judge

8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
30 Case No. 3:17-cv-5576-JST

STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL AND PROPOSED ORDER

31

3

1
2
3
4

ATTESTATION OF FILER
Pursuant to L.R. 5-1(i)(3), I hereby attest that I obtained concurrence in this filing from
each signatory whose ECF User ID and Password is not utilized in the electronic filing of this
document, and will maintain records to support this concurrence.

5
6

/s/ Lewis E. Hudnell, III
Lewis E. Hudnell, III

7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
30 Case No. 3:17-cv-5576-JST
STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL AND PROPOSED ORDER

31

4