Finjan, Inc. v. Juniper Network, Inc.

Filing 200

ORDER RE DISCOVERY DISPUTE [re 199 Letter Brief filed by Juniper Network, Inc.]. Response due by NOON on 10/9/2018. Signed by Judge William Alsup on 10/4/2018. (whasec, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/4/2018)

1
2
3
4
5
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
6
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

7
8
9

FINJAN, INC.,

United States District Court
For the Northern District of California

10
11
12

Plaintiff,
v.
JUNIPER NETWORK, INC.,

13

ORDER RE DISCOVERY DISPUTE

Defendant.
/

14
15

No. C 17-05659 WHA

The Court has received a letter dated October 4 from defendant Juniper Network, Inc.,

16

requesting that an interrogatory answer quoted on page two be useable in the related IPR

17

proceeding notwithstanding the protective order in this case (Dkt. No. 199). The Court is

18

inclined to agree that Juniper should be allowed to use the interrogatory answer in question so

19

long as they are filed under seal pursuant to a protective order that offers the same protection in

20

this case.

21

On or before OCTOBER 9 AT NOON, plaintiff Finjan, Inc., must (in writing) either agree

22

to its use in the related IPR proceeding or show cause in this Court by sworn declaration why

23

such permission should not be granted. This matter will be decided based upon the papers

24

inasmuch as the Court will be absent for most of the next ten days.

25
26
27
28

IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated: October 4, 2018.

WILLIAM ALSUP
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE