Finjan, Inc. v. Juniper Network, Inc.

Filing 525

Discovery Order granting in part and denying in part the motion to seal. Signed by Judge Thomas S. Hixson on 6/11/2019. (tshlc2S, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/11/2019)

1
2
3
4

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

5

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

6
7

FINJAN, INC.,
Plaintiff,

8
9
10

United States District Court
Northern District of California

11

Case No. 17-cv-05659-WHA (TSH)

v.
JUNIPER NETWORK, INC., et al.,
Defendants.

ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND
DENYING IN PART MOTION TO
SEAL
Re: Dkt. No. 513

12
13

On June 5, 2019 Juniper filed a motion to seal the entirety of the deposition transcript of

14

Khurram Islah on the ground that third party Joe Security had designated it as confidential. ECF

15

No. 513. On June 7, 2019 Joe Security filed the declaration of Stefan Buehlmann, which provided

16

substantiation for redactions to large portions of the Islah declaration. ECF No. 524-1. However,

17

the declaration does not demonstrate that the entirety of the transcript must be filed under seal.

18

Local Rule 79-5 states that requests to seal “must be narrowly tailored to seek sealing only of

19

sealable material . . .” Accordingly, the Court GRANTS IN PART and DENIES IN PART the

20

motion to seal. Within seven days Joe Security shall provide to Juniper redactions to the Islah

21

deposition transcript that redact any confidential information. Juniper shall then file the transcript

22

as redacted by Joe Security.

23
24

IT IS SO ORDERED.

25
26

Dated: June 11, 2019

27
28

THOMAS S. HIXSON
United States Magistrate Judge