Hagler v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.
Filing
16
STIPULATION AND ORDER re 15 STIPULATION and Proposed Order selecting Private ADR by Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. filed by Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. Signed by Judge Jon S. Tigar on December 27, 2017. (wsn, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/27/2017)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
FRANK HAGLER
CASE No C 3:17-cv-05770-JST
Plaintiff(s)
v.
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED]
ORDER SELECTING ADR PROCESS
WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A., et al.
Defendant(s)
Counsel report that they have met and conferred regarding ADR and have reached the following
stipulation pursuant to Civil L.R. 16-8 and ADR L.R. 3-5. The parties agree to participate in the
following ADR process:
Early Neutral Evaluation (ENE) (ADR L.R. 5)
Note: Magistrate judges do not conduct
mediations under ADR L.R. 6. To request an
early settlement conference with a Magistrate
Judge, you must file a Notice of Need for
ADR Phone Conference. Do not use this
form. See Civil Local Rule 16-8 and ADR
L.R. 3-5.
Mediation (ADR L.R. 6)
■
Private ADR (specify process and provider)
The parties have agreed to private mediation,
but have not yet selected a mediator.
The parties agree to hold the ADR session by:
the presumptive deadline (90 days from the date of the order referring the case to ADR,
unless otherwise ordered. )
other requested deadline: June 30, 2018
Date: December 26, 2017
Date: December 26, 2017
/s/ Alexander Nestor
Attorney for Plaintiff
/s/ Sean McHenry
Attorney for Defendant
S
UNIT
ED
Date: December 27, 2017
S DISTRICT
TE
C
TA
RT
U
O
XX IT IS SO ORDERED
IT IS SO ORDERED WITH MODIFICATIONS:
DERED
O OR
IT IS S
R NIA
■
U.S. DISTRICT/MAGISTRATE JUDGE
RT
FO
NO
S . Ti ga r
d ge J o n
J choices: “Stipulation & Proposed
Important! E-file this form in ECF using the appropriate event among theseu
Form ADR-Stip rev. 1-2017
LI
RN
A
H
Order Selecting Mediation” or “Stipulation & Proposed Order Selecting ENE” or “Stipulation & Proposed
Order Selecting Private ADR.”
E
F
D IS T IC T O
R
C
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?