Hagler v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.

Filing 16

STIPULATION AND ORDER re 15 STIPULATION and Proposed Order selecting Private ADR by Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. filed by Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. Signed by Judge Jon S. Tigar on December 27, 2017. (wsn, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/27/2017)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA FRANK HAGLER CASE No C 3:17-cv-05770-JST Plaintiff(s) v. STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER SELECTING ADR PROCESS WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A., et al. Defendant(s) Counsel report that they have met and conferred regarding ADR and have reached the following stipulation pursuant to Civil L.R. 16-8 and ADR L.R. 3-5. The parties agree to participate in the following ADR process: Early Neutral Evaluation (ENE) (ADR L.R. 5) Note: Magistrate judges do not conduct mediations under ADR L.R. 6. To request an early settlement conference with a Magistrate Judge, you must file a Notice of Need for ADR Phone Conference. Do not use this form. See Civil Local Rule 16-8 and ADR L.R. 3-5. Mediation (ADR L.R. 6) ■ Private ADR (specify process and provider) The parties have agreed to private mediation, but have not yet selected a mediator. The parties agree to hold the ADR session by: the presumptive deadline (90 days from the date of the order referring the case to ADR, unless otherwise ordered. ) other requested deadline: June 30, 2018 Date: December 26, 2017 Date: December 26, 2017 /s/ Alexander Nestor Attorney for Plaintiff /s/ Sean McHenry Attorney for Defendant S UNIT ED Date: December 27, 2017 S DISTRICT TE C TA RT U O XX IT IS SO ORDERED IT IS SO ORDERED WITH MODIFICATIONS: DERED O OR IT IS S R NIA ■ U.S. DISTRICT/MAGISTRATE JUDGE RT FO NO S . Ti ga r d ge J o n J choices: “Stipulation & Proposed Important! E-file this form in ECF using the appropriate event among theseu Form ADR-Stip rev. 1-2017 LI RN A H Order Selecting Mediation” or “Stipulation & Proposed Order Selecting ENE” or “Stipulation & Proposed Order Selecting Private ADR.” E F D IS T IC T O R C

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?