Ke v. Romeo

Filing 4

ORDER of Dismissal. Signed by Judge Edward M. Chen on 11/30/2017. (Attachments: # 1 Certificate/Proof of Service)(emcsec, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/30/2017)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 7 HUI LIAN KE, Plaintiff, 8 9 Case No. 17-cv-05973-EMC ORDER OF DISMISSAL v. Docket No. 1 10 Defendant. 12 For the Northern District of California United States District Court 11 SUZANNE ROMERO, 13 Hui Lian Ke, also known as Lily Ko, filed this pro se civil rights action pursuant to 42 14 U.S.C. § 1983. At the time she filed the action, Plaintiff was an inmate at the Santa Clara County 15 Jail and has since been transferred to Napa State Hospital. The complaint is largely 16 incomprehensible but attempts to allege claims about the removal of her two children from their 17 home on or about May 6, 2014, by defendant. 18 The complaint in this action repeats claims made in Ki v. Romero, Case No. 17-cv-5666 SI. 19 Although they espouse different legal theories, both complaints concern an incident on May 6, 20 2014, and both have the same defendant. The earlier action is still pending. 21 The complaint in this action is frivolous because it is duplicative of the complaint filed in 22 the earlier action. See Cato v. United States, 70 F.3d 1103, 1105 n.2 (9th Cir. 1995); Bailey v. 23 Johnson, 846 F.2d 1019, 1021 (5th Cir. 1988) (duplicative or repetitious litigation of virtually 24 identical causes of action is subject to dismissal under 28 U.S.C. § 1915 as malicious); see also 25 Adams v. California Dept. of Health Services, 487 F.3d 684, 689 (9th Cir. 2007) (“Plaintiffs 26 generally have „no right to maintain two separate actions involving the same subject matter at the 27 same time in the same court and against the same defendant.‟”) 28 1 2 Accordingly, this action is DISMISSED with prejudice because it is frivolous. The Clerk shall close the file. 3 4 IT IS SO ORDERED. 5 6 7 8 Dated: November 30, 2017 ______________________________________ EDWARD M. CHEN United States District Judge 9 10 12 For the Northern District of California United States District Court 11 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?