Ke v. Romeo
Filing
4
ORDER of Dismissal. Signed by Judge Edward M. Chen on 11/30/2017. (Attachments: # 1 Certificate/Proof of Service)(emcsec, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/30/2017)
1
2
3
4
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
5
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
6
7
HUI LIAN KE,
Plaintiff,
8
9
Case No. 17-cv-05973-EMC
ORDER OF DISMISSAL
v.
Docket No. 1
10
Defendant.
12
For the Northern District of California
United States District Court
11
SUZANNE ROMERO,
13
Hui Lian Ke, also known as Lily Ko, filed this pro se civil rights action pursuant to 42
14
U.S.C. § 1983. At the time she filed the action, Plaintiff was an inmate at the Santa Clara County
15
Jail and has since been transferred to Napa State Hospital. The complaint is largely
16
incomprehensible but attempts to allege claims about the removal of her two children from their
17
home on or about May 6, 2014, by defendant.
18
The complaint in this action repeats claims made in Ki v. Romero, Case No. 17-cv-5666 SI.
19
Although they espouse different legal theories, both complaints concern an incident on May 6,
20
2014, and both have the same defendant. The earlier action is still pending.
21
The complaint in this action is frivolous because it is duplicative of the complaint filed in
22
the earlier action. See Cato v. United States, 70 F.3d 1103, 1105 n.2 (9th Cir. 1995); Bailey v.
23
Johnson, 846 F.2d 1019, 1021 (5th Cir. 1988) (duplicative or repetitious litigation of virtually
24
identical causes of action is subject to dismissal under 28 U.S.C. § 1915 as malicious); see also
25
Adams v. California Dept. of Health Services, 487 F.3d 684, 689 (9th Cir. 2007) (“Plaintiffs
26
generally have „no right to maintain two separate actions involving the same subject matter at the
27
same time in the same court and against the same defendant.‟”)
28
1
2
Accordingly, this action is DISMISSED with prejudice because it is frivolous. The Clerk
shall close the file.
3
4
IT IS SO ORDERED.
5
6
7
8
Dated: November 30, 2017
______________________________________
EDWARD M. CHEN
United States District Judge
9
10
12
For the Northern District of California
United States District Court
11
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?