Brach v. Wells Fargo & Co., et al

Filing 15

ORDER RELATING CASES. Muniz v. Wells Fargo & Company et al, C17-4995 MMC, is related to Brach v. Wells Fargo & Company et al, C17-5990 JST. The Clerk of Court is directed to reassign the later-filed action to the undersigned. Signed by Judge Maxine M. Chesney on 11/06/2017. (mmclc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/6/2017)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA RELATED CASE ORDER A Motion to Consider Whether Cases Should be Related has been filed, requesting a determination as to whether the following cases are related within the meaning of Civil L.R. 3-12(a): C 17-4995 MMC C 17-5990 JST Muniz v. Wells Fargo & Company, et al. Brach v. Wells Fargo & Company, et al. On the basis of the material submitted to the Court, as the Judge assigned to the earliest filed case, I find that the cases: [ ] ARE NOT RELATED as defined by Civil L.R. 3-12(a). [ X ] ARE RELATED as defined by Civil L.R. 3-12(a). Pursuant to Civil L.R. 3-12(f)(3), the Clerk of Court is ordered to reassign the later-filed action to the undersigned. The parties are instructed that all future filings in the reassigned case are to bear the initials MMC immediately after the case number. Any case management conference in the reassigned case will be rescheduled by the Court. Any dates for hearing noticed motions are vacated; any deadlines set by the ADR Local Rules remain in effect; and any deadlines established in a case management order continue to govern, except dates for appearance in court, which will be rescheduled by the undersigned. DATED: November 6, 2014 MAXINE M. CHESNEY United States District Judge

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?