Brach v. Wells Fargo & Co., et al
ORDER RELATING CASES. Muniz v. Wells Fargo & Company et al, C17-4995 MMC, is related to Brach v. Wells Fargo & Company et al, C17-5990 JST. The Clerk of Court is directed to reassign the later-filed action to the undersigned. Signed by Judge Maxine M. Chesney on 11/06/2017. (mmclc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/6/2017)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
RELATED CASE ORDER
A Motion to Consider Whether Cases Should be Related has been filed,
requesting a determination as to whether the following cases are related within the
meaning of Civil L.R. 3-12(a):
C 17-4995 MMC
C 17-5990 JST
Muniz v. Wells Fargo & Company, et al.
Brach v. Wells Fargo & Company, et al.
On the basis of the material submitted to the Court, as the Judge assigned to the
earliest filed case, I find that the cases:
] ARE NOT RELATED as defined by Civil L.R. 3-12(a).
[ X ] ARE RELATED as defined by Civil L.R. 3-12(a).
Pursuant to Civil L.R. 3-12(f)(3), the Clerk of Court is ordered to reassign the
later-filed action to the undersigned. The parties are instructed that all future filings in
the reassigned case are to bear the initials MMC immediately after the case number.
Any case management conference in the reassigned case will be rescheduled by the
Court. Any dates for hearing noticed motions are vacated; any deadlines set by the
ADR Local Rules remain in effect; and any deadlines established in a case
management order continue to govern, except dates for appearance in court, which will
be rescheduled by the undersigned.
DATED: November 6, 2014
MAXINE M. CHESNEY
United States District Judge
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?