Maston v. Bluestar Refreshment Services

Filing 113

ORDER DISMISSING CASE. IT IS ORDERED THAT THIS ACTION BE, AND HEREBY IS, DISMISSED WITH Prejudice as to Plaintiffs individual claims and WITHOUT PREJUDICE as to the putative class as to all claims, causes of action, and parties, with each party to bear own attorney's fees and costs. Signed by Chief Magistrate Judge Joseph C. Spero on 10/22/2020. (klhS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/22/2020)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA CHRISTOPHER MASTON, an individual, on behalf of himself and others similarly situated CASE NO. 3:17-cv-06000-JCS [PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL PURSUANT TO F.R.C.P. 23(E) PLAINTIFF, v. BLUESTAR REFRESHMENT SERVICES, DEFENDANTS. 1 [PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL PURSUANT TO F.R.C.P. 23(E) [PROPOSED] ORDER OF DISMISSAL The Court having considered the Joint Stipulation of the parties, and good cause appearing, orders as follows: Pursuant to Plaintiff CHRISTOPHER MASTON’s request for Voluntary Dismissal under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 23(e), IT IS ORDERED THAT THIS ACTION BE, AND HEREBY IS, DISMISSED WITH Prejudice as to Plaintiff’s individual claims and WITHOUT PREJUDICE as to the putative class as to all claims, causes of action, and parties, with each party bearing that party’s own attorney’s fees and costs. IT IS SO ORDERED. October 22, 2020 Dated: __________________ _____________________________ Chief Magistrate Judge Hon. Joseph C. Spero 2 [PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL PURSUANT TO F.R.C.P. 23(E)

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?