The People of the State of California v. BP P.L.C. et al

Filing 212

ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFFS' MOTION FOR LEAVE TO RESPOND TO UNITED STATES' AMICUS BRIEF by Judge William Alsup. (whalc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/21/2018)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION

14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28

CITY OF OAKLAND, a Municipal Corporation,
and THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF
CALIFORNIA, acting by and through the
Oakland City Attorney,
Plaintiffs,

Case No.: 3:17-cv-06011-WHA
[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING
PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION FOR LEAVE
TO RESPOND TO UNITED STATES’
AMICUS BRIEF

v.
BP P.L.C., a public limited company of England
and Wales, CHEVRON CORPORATION, a
Delaware corporation, CONOCOPHILLIPS, a
Delaware corporation, EXXON MOBIL
CORPORATION, a New Jersey corporation,
ROYAL DUTCH SHELL PLC, a public limited
company of England and Wales, and DOES 1
through 10,
Defendants.

Hearing Date: May 24, 2018
Hearing Time: 8:00 a.m.
Courtroom 12 (19th floor)
Judge: Hon. William Alsup

1
2

CHEVRON CORP.,
Third Party Plaintiff,

3

v.

4

STATOIL ASA,

5
6
7
8

Third Party Defendant.
CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO,
a Municipal Corporation, and THE PEOPLE OF
THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA, acting by and
through the San Francisco City Attorney
DENNIS J. HERRERA,

9

Plaintiffs,

10
11
12
13
14
15

v.
BP P.L.C., a public limited company of England
and Wales, CHEVRON CORPORATION, a
Delaware corporation, CONOCOPHILLIPS, a
Delaware corporation, EXXON MOBIL
CORPORATION, a New Jersey corporation,
ROYAL DUTCH SHELL PLC, a public limited
company of England and Wales, and DOES 1
through 10,
Defendants.

16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28

CHEVRON CORP.,
Third Party Plaintiff,
v.
STATOIL ASA,
Third Party Defendant.

Case No.: 3:17-cv-06012-WHA
[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING
PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION FOR LEAVE
TO RESPOND TO UNITED STATES’
AMICUS BRIEF
Hearing Date: May 24, 2018
Hearing Time: 8:00 a.m.
Courtroom 12 (19th floor)
Judge: Hon. William Alsup

1

Upon consideration of plaintiffs’ motion for leave to submit a response to the United States’

2

amicus brief, and other materials as the Court deems just and proper, the Court has determined that

3

plaintiffs’ motion should be, and is, GRANTED. Plaintiffs shall be permitted to file a response to

4

the United States’ amicus brief.

5

IT IS SO ORDERED.

6
7

Dated: May 21, 2018.

By: __________________________
HON. WILLIAM H. ALSUP
United States District Judge

8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
1

[PROPOSED] ORDER PLS.’ MOT. FOR LEAVE TO RESPOND UNITED STATES’ AMICUS BRIEF
Case Nos. 17-cv-6011-WHA, 17-cv-6012-WHA