Moralez v. California Check Cashing Stores, LLC et al
Filing
19
STIPULATION AND ORDER re 18 STIPULATION WITH PROPOSED ORDER extending deadline to complete joint site inspection filed by Francisca Moralez. Signed by Judge Jon S. Tigar on January 30, 2018. (wsn, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/30/2018)
1
2
3
4
5
Zachary M. Best, SBN 166035
MISSION LAW FIRM, A.P.C.
332 North Second Street
San Jose, California 95112
Telephone (408) 298-2000
Facsimile (408) 298-6046
E-mail: service@mission.legal
Attorney for Plaintiff,
Francisca Moralez
6
7
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
8
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
FRANCISCA MORALEZ,
)
)
Plaintiff,
)
)
vs.
)
)
CALIFORNIA CHECK CASHING STORES, )
LLC dba CALIFORNIA CHECK CASHING, )
)
et al.,
)
)
Defendants.
)
)
)
)
)
No. 3:17-cv-06141-JST
STIPULATION TO EXTEND DEADLINE
TO COMPLETE JOINT SITE
INSPECTION REQUIRED BY GENERAL
ORDER 56; [PROPOSED] ORDER
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
Plaintiff, Francisca Moralez (“Plaintiff”), and Defendants, California Check Cashing
Stores, LLC dba California Check Cashing; and Genirberg Family, LLC, dba The Genirberg
Family Limited Partnership (“Defendants,” and together with Plaintiff, “the Parties”), by and
through their respective counsel, hereby stipulate as follows:
1.
This action arises out of Plaintiff’s claims that Defendants denied her full and
equal access to their public accommodation on account of her disabilities in violation of Title
III of the Americans with Disabilities Act (“ADA”) and parallel California law. Plaintiff seeks
injunctive relief under federal and California law, as well as damages under California law.
This matter therefore proceeds under this district’s General Order 56 which governs ADA
STIPULATION TO EXTEND DEADLINE TO COMPLETE JOINT SITE INSPECTION REQUIRED BY
GENERAL ORDER 56; [PROPOSED] ORDER
Page 1
1
access matters.
2
2.
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
The Court has ordered that the Parties conduct a joint site inspection of the
subject property on or before February 8, 2018 (Dkt. 4).
3.
Counsel for Defendants are unavailable to conduct the joint site inspection prior
to the February 8, 2018 deadline.
4.
The Parties have agreed to conduct the joint site inspection on February 13, 2018
at 10:00 a.m. unless a settlement is reached prior to that date.
5.
Accordingly, the Parties stipulate to extend the deadline to conduct the joint site
inspection to February 13, 2018.
10
11
IT IS SO STIPULATED.
12
13
Dated: January 29, 2018
14
MISSION LAW FIRM, A.P.C.
/s/ Zachary M. Best
Zachary M. Best
Attorney for Plaintiff,
Francisca Moralez
15
16
17
18
Dated: January 29, 2018
19
/s/ Anthony J. Decristoforo
Anthony J. Decristoforo
Attorneys for Defendant,
California Check Cashing Stores, LLC
dba California Check Cashing
20
21
22
23
OGLETREE, DEAKINS, NASH, SMOAK &
STEWART, P .C.
Dated: January 29, 2018
FERBER LAW
24
25
26
27
/s/ James B. Wickersham
James B. Wickersham
Attorneys for Defendant,
Genirberg Family, LLC, dba The Genirberg
Family Limited Partnership
28
STIPULATION TO EXTEND DEADLINE TO COMPLETE JOINT SITE INSPECTION REQUIRED BY
GENERAL ORDER 56; [PROPOSED] ORDER
Page 2
1
ATTESTATION
2
Concurrence in the filing of this document has been obtained from each of the individual(s)
whose electronic signature is attributed above.
3
4
/s/ Zachary M. Best
Zachary M. Best
Attorney for Plaintiff,
Francisca Moralez
5
6
7
[PROPOSED] ORDER
8
9
The Parties having so stipulated and good cause appearing,
10
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the deadline for the Parties to complete the joint site
11
inspection is extended to February 13, 2018, with all dates triggered by that deadline continued
12
accordingly.
13
14
IT IS SO ORDERED.
15
16
17
Dated: January 30, 2018
United States District Judge
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
STIPULATION TO EXTEND DEADLINE TO COMPLETE JOINT SITE INSPECTION REQUIRED BY
GENERAL ORDER 56; [PROPOSED] ORDER
Page 3
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?