Zithromia Limited et al v. Gazeus Negocios De Internet SA et al
Filing
21
ORDER re 17 Application for Alternate Service on Defendants. Initial case management conference set for 4/5/2018 at 10:00 AM in San Francisco, Courtroom 11, 19th Floor. Case management statement due by 3/29/2018. Signed by Judge James Donato on 3/5/2018. (jdlc3S, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/5/2018)
1
2
3
4
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
5
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
6
7
ZITHROMIA LIMITED, et al.,
Plaintiffs,
8
9
10
ORDER RE RENEWED APPLICATION
FOR ALTERNATIVE SERVICE
v.
GAZEUS NEGOCIOS DE INTERNET SA,
et al.,
11
United States District Court
Northern District of California
Case No. 3:17-cv-06475-JD
Re: Dkt. No. 17
Defendants.
12
13
The Court previously denied on several grounds plaintiffs’ “ex parte” applications for
14
alternative service on defendants, who are located in Brazil, and a TRO. Dkt. No. 16. Plaintiffs
15
have now filed a renewed application for alternative service. Dkt. No. 17. The salient changed
16
circumstances since plaintiffs’ initial application include the fact that defendants have specially
17
appeared in the case through California counsel, Dkt. No. 15, and that defendants have not
18
responded to delivery of the pleadings and other papers. Dkt. No. 17-1 at 11.
19
An order of service under Rule 4(f)(3) is GRANTED. Service of the complaint may be
20
made on Mark Riera, the counsel of record for specially appearing defendants here. See Xilinx,
21
Inc. v. Godo Kaisha IP Bridge 1, 246 F. Supp. 3d 1260 (N.D. Cal. 2017)). Plaintiffs should email
22
the complaint to attorney Riera and send a hard copy by registered mail through the United States
23
Postal Service to his law office. An initial case management conference is set for April 5, 2018 at
24
10:00AM.
25
IT IS SO ORDERED.
26
Dated: March 5, 2018
27
28
JAMES DONATO
United States District Judge
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?