Ross v. Fogarty et al

Filing 19

STIPULATION AND ORDER re 18 STIPULATION WITH PROPOSED ORDER STAYING CASE PENDING THE MOTION TO DISMISS IN THE RELATED SECURITIES CLASS ACTION filed by Gerald Ross. Signed by Judge Jon S. Tigar on January 18, 2018. (wsn, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/18/2018)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Michael A. Mugmon (SBN 251958) Michael.Mugmon@wilmerhale.com Rebecca A. Girolamo (SBN 293422) becky.girolamo@wilmerhale.com WILMER CUTLER PICKERING HALE AND DORR LLP 950 Page Mill Road Palo Alto, CA 94304 Telephone: (650) 858-6103 Facsimile: (650) 858-6100 Attorneys for Defendants and Nominal Defendant 8 9 10 Stuart J. Guber (admitted pro hac vice) sguber@faruqilaw.com FARUQI & FARUQI, LLP 101 Greenwood Ave., Suite 600 Jenkintown, PA 19046 Telephone: (215) 277-5770 Facsimile: (215) 277-5771 Benjamin Heikali (SBN 307466) bheikali@faruqilaw.com FARUQI & FARUQI, LLP 10866 Wilshire Boulevard, Suite 1470 Los Angeles, CA 90024 Telephone: (424) 256-2884 Facsimile: (424) 256-2885 Attorneys for Plaintiff UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 11 12 13 14 GERALD ROSS, Derivatively and on Behalf of DEPOMED, INC., 15 Plaintiff, 16 vs. 17 18 19 20 21 22 Case No. 3:17-cv-06592-JST JOINT STIPULATION & [PROPOSED] ORDER STAYING CASE PENDING THE MOTION TO DISMISS IN THE RELATED SECURITIES CLASS ACTION JAMES P. FOGARTY, KAREN A. DAWES, ARTHUR J. HIGGINS, LOUIS J. LAVIGNE, JR., WILLIAM T. MCKEE, GAVIN T. MOLINELLI, ROBERT G. SAVAGE, PETER D. STAPLE, JAMES L. TYREE, SAMUEL R. SAKS, M.D., JAMES A. SCHOENECK, DAVID B. ZENOFF, SRINIVAS G. RAO, M.D., PH.D. and R. SCOTT SHIVELY, 23 Defendants, 24 and 25 DEPOMED, INC., 26 27 28 Nominal Defendant. JOINT STIPULATION & [PROPOSED] ORDER STAYING CASE PENDING THE MOTION TO DISMISS IN THE RELATED SECURITIES CLASS ACTION 1 WHEREAS, Plaintiff Gerald Ross (“Plaintiff”) filed the above-captioned derivative action 2 (“Derivative Litigation”) on November 15, 2017, against Defendants James P. Fogarty, Karen A. 3 Dawes, Arthur J. Higgins, Louis J. Lavigne, Jr., William T. McKee, Gavin T. Molinelli, Robert G. 4 Savage, Peter D. Staple, James L. Tyree, Samuel R. Saks, M.D., James A. Schoeneck, David B. 5 Zenoff, Srinivas G. Rao, M.D., Ph.D. and R. Scott Shively (collectively, “Individual Defendants” 6 and together with Nominal Defendant Depomed, Inc., the “Defendants”) (Plaintiff and Defendants 7 are collectively referred to herein as the “Parties”); 8 WHEREAS, the Parties hereby jointly stipulate to stay the Derivative Litigation until and 9 through the resolution of the motion to dismiss that is anticipated to be filed in the related securities 10 class action lawsuit against Depomed, Inc., Arthur J. Higgins, James A. Schoeneck, and August J. 11 Moretti, captioned Huang v. Depomed, Inc., et al., No. 3:17-cv-04830, in the United States District 12 Court for the Northern District of California (the “Securities Class Action”); and 13 WHEREAS, this Parties believe that a stay of this action will promote the efficient and 14 orderly administration of justice by coordinating the Derivative Litigation with the Securities Class 15 Action; 16 17 18 19 NOW, THEREFORE, the Parties, by and through their undersigned counsel of record, hereby agree and stipulate to the following: 1. Defendants waived the service of summons and accepted service of the Complaint with Defendants response due on or about January 16, 2018; 20 2. The Derivative Litigation (and all discovery) shall be stayed until 30 days after the 21 earlier of the following of events: (a) the Securities Class Action is dismissed in its 22 entirety with prejudice; or (b) Defendants file an answer to any complaint in the 23 Securities Class Action; 24 3. If the stay of proceedings expires pursuant to Paragraph 2 above, the Parties shall meet 25 and confer and submit a proposed scheduling order governing further proceedings in 26 the Derivative Litigation, including the date by which Defendants must answer or 27 28 2 JOINT STIPULATION & [PROPOSED] ORDER STAYING CASE PENDING THE MOTION TO DISMISS IN THE RELATED SECURITIES CLASS ACTION 1 otherwise plead; 2 4. All hearings or conferences currently scheduled, including the Case Management 3 Conference currently scheduled for January 31, 2018, shall be postponed until after the 4 stay of the Derivative Litigation expires; 5 5. Should discovery proceed in the Securities Class Action, or in any other subsequent 6 derivative action based on substantially the same factual allegations underlying the 7 Derivative Litigation and/or in connection with any threatened related derivative action 8 (including any books and records demand made by a Depomed, Inc. shareholder), and 9 the Derivative Litigation continues to be stayed by virtue of this Stipulation, a further 10 Stipulation or Court Order, Plaintiff will promptly be given copies of any written 11 discovery responses, documents, and deposition transcripts prepared and/or produced 12 by any Defendants and/or any non-party, such as are relevant to the claims or defenses 13 in the Derivative Litigation, pursuant to a mutually agreed upon protective order 14 governing the use of confidential information. The provision of any such discovery 15 materials will not constitute waiver of, or in any way limit, Defendants’ right to move 16 to dismiss the Derivative Litigation for failure to adequately plead demand futility, or 17 make a pre-suit demand. Notwithstanding the foregoing, Plaintiff reserves his rights to 18 seek any such discovery materials in the Derivative Litigation; 19 6. Plaintiff acknowledges that his right to receive written discovery responses, documents, 20 deposition transcripts, and any other information described above is contingent upon 21 his agreement to be bound by any confidentiality agreement or order governing the 22 materials produced in the Securities Class Action or any related derivative action, with 23 the express understanding that Plaintiff shall be entitled to use any such materials 24 produced to him pursuant to this stipulation in the Derivative Litigation. If Plaintiff 25 cannot become a party to any confidentiality agreement or order entered in the 26 Securities Class Action or any related derivative action, he agrees that he will enter into 27 28 3 JOINT STIPULATION & [PROPOSED] ORDER STAYING CASE PENDING THE MOTION TO DISMISS IN THE RELATED SECURITIES CLASS ACTION 1 a separate agreement with Defendants acknowledging his agreement to be bound by 2 the terms of the confidentiality agreement or order entered in the Securities Class 3 Action or any related derivative action, with the express understanding that Plaintiff 4 shall be entitled to use any such materials produced to him pursuant to this stipulation 5 in the Derivative Litigation, and further agrees that his acknowledgement agreement 6 may be enforceable in the Derivative Litigation; 7 8 9 10 7. The Parties shall promptly notify each other of any related derivative lawsuits or threatened related derivative lawsuits of which they become aware; 8. Defendants shall promptly notify Plaintiff if the plaintiff in any related derivative lawsuit refuses to agree to a stay that is for the same or longer duration; 11 9. If the plaintiff in any related derivative lawsuit refuses to agree to a stay that is for the 12 same or longer duration, after conferring with the opposing party, any party may lift 13 the stay upon 30 days’ notice via email to all of the undersigned counsel, in which event 14 each party reserves the right to make a motion to stay the Derivative Litigation; 15 10. Plaintiff will promptly be advised of, and be permitted to participate in, any mediation 16 proceedings and in any formal settlement talks in the Securities Class Action, in any 17 related derivative action, and/or in any threatened related derivative action; 18 11. Notwithstanding this stay of the Derivative Litigation, Plaintiff may file an amended 19 complaint. Without waiving any defenses or objections, Defendants shall be under no 20 obligation to answer, move, or otherwise respond to any such complaints while the 21 State Derivative Action is stayed; and 22 12. This Stipulation shall not preclude or prevent the Parties from stipulating to, or filing a 23 motion seeking, a court order lifting, modifying, or extending the terms of this 24 stipulation, and any Party’s right to oppose such a motion 25 13. The existence of this stipulation, the contents thereof, and any negotiations or 26 proceedings in connection therewith shall not be deemed a presumption, concession, 27 28 4 JOINT STIPULATION & [PROPOSED] ORDER STAYING CASE PENDING THE MOTION TO DISMISS IN THE RELATED SECURITIES CLASS ACTION 1 2 finding, or admission by any of the Parties of any fault, liability, or wrongdoing; and 14. The Parties respectfully request the Court to enter an Order to this effect. 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 STIPULATED AND AGREED TO: DATED: January 15, 2018 WILMER CUTLER PICKERING HALE AND DORR LLP 10 11 By: /s/ Michael A. Mugmon___ Michael A. Mugmon (SBN 251958) Rebecca A. Girolamo (SBN 293422) 950 Page Mill Road Palo Alto, CA 94304 12 13 14 Attorneys for Defendants and Nominal Defendant 15 16 FARUQI & FARUQI, LLP 17 By: /s/ Benjamin Heikali_____ Benjamin Heikali (SBN 307466) 10866 Wilshire Boulevard, Suite 1470 Los Angeles, CA 90024 18 19 20 Stuart J. Guber (admitted pro hac vice) 101 Greenwood Ave., Suite 600 Jenkintown, PA 19046 21 22 Attorneys for Plaintiff 23 24 25 26 27 28 5 JOINT STIPULATION & [PROPOSED] ORDER STAYING CASE PENDING THE MOTION TO DISMISS IN THE RELATED SECURITIES CLASS ACTION ATTESTATION OF E-FILED SIGNATURE 1 2 I, Benjamin Heikali, am the ECF User whose ID and password are being used to file the 3 foregoing document in compliance with Civil L.R. 5-1(i)(3). I attest that all other signatories 4 listed, and on whose behalf the filing is being submitted, concur in the filing’s content and have 5 authorized the filing of this stipulation. 6 7 8 Dated: January 15, 2018 By: /s/ Benjamin Heikali Benjamin Heikali 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 6 JOINT STIPULATION & [PROPOSED] ORDER STAYING CASE PENDING THE MOTION TO DISMISS IN THE RELATED SECURITIES CLASS ACTION [PROPOSED] ORDER 1 2 3 Based upon the above stipulation of the Parties and for good cause appearing: 1. The Derivative Litigation (including all discovery) shall be stayed until 30 days after 4 the earlier of the following of events: (a) the Securities Class Action is dismissed in its 5 entirety with prejudice; or (b) Defendants file an answer to any complaint in the 6 Securities Class Action; 7 2. If the stay of proceedings expires, the Parties shall meet and confer and submit a 8 proposed scheduling order governing further proceedings in the Derivative Litigation, 9 including the date by which Defendants must answer or otherwise plead; 10 3. All hearings or conferences currently scheduled, including the Case Management 11 Conference currently scheduled for January 31, 2018, shall be postponed until after the 12 stay of the Derivative Litigation expires; 13 4. Should discovery proceed in the Securities Class Action, or in any other subsequent 14 derivative action based on substantially the same factual allegations underlying the 15 Derivative Litigation and/or in connection with any threatened related derivative action 16 (including any books and records demand made by a Depomed, Inc. shareholder), and 17 the Derivative Litigation continues to be stayed by virtue of this Stipulation, a further 18 Stipulation or Court Order, Plaintiff will promptly be given copies of any written 19 discovery responses, documents, and deposition transcripts prepared and/or produced 20 by any Defendants and/or any non-party, such as are relevant to the claims or defenses 21 in the Derivative Litigation, pursuant to a mutually agreed upon protective order 22 governing the use of confidential information. The provision of any such discovery 23 materials will not constitute waiver of, or in any way limit, Defendants’ right to move 24 to dismiss the Derivative Litigation for failure to adequately plead demand futility, or 25 make a pre-suit demand. Notwithstanding the foregoing, Plaintiff reserves his rights to 26 seek any such discovery materials in the Derivative Litigation; 27 28 7 JOINT STIPULATION & [PROPOSED] ORDER STAYING CASE PENDING THE MOTION TO DISMISS IN THE RELATED SECURITIES CLASS ACTION 1 5. Plaintiff acknowledges that his right to receive written discovery responses, documents, 2 deposition transcripts, and any other information described above is contingent upon 3 his agreement to be bound by any confidentiality agreement or order governing the 4 materials produced in the Securities Class Action or any related derivative action, with 5 the express understanding that Plaintiff shall be entitled to use any such materials 6 produced to him pursuant to this stipulation in the Derivative Litigation. If Plaintiff 7 cannot become a party to any confidentiality agreement or order entered in the 8 Securities Class Action or any related derivative action, he agrees that he will enter into 9 a separate agreement with Defendants acknowledging his agreement to be bound by 10 the terms of the confidentiality agreement or order entered in the Securities Class 11 Action or any related derivative action, with the express understanding that Plaintiff 12 shall be entitled to use any such materials produced to him pursuant to this stipulation 13 in the Derivative Litigation, and further agrees that his acknowledgement agreement 14 may be enforceable in the Derivative Litigation; 15 6. threatened related derivative lawsuits of which they become aware; 16 17 7. Defendants shall promptly notify Plaintiff if the plaintiff in any related derivative lawsuit refuses to agree to a stay that is for the same or longer duration; 18 19 The Parties shall promptly notify each other of any related derivative lawsuits or 8. If the plaintiff in any related derivative lawsuit refuses to agree to a stay that is for the 20 same or longer duration, after conferring with the opposing party, any party may lift 21 the stay upon 30 days’ notice via email to all of the undersigned counsel, in which event 22 each party reserves the right to make a motion to stay the Derivative Litigation; 23 9. Plaintiff will promptly be advised of, and be permitted to participate in, any mediation 24 proceedings and in any formal settlement talks in the Securities Class Action, in any 25 related derivative action, and/or in any threatened related derivative action; 26 27 28 10. Notwithstanding this stay of the Derivative Litigation, Plaintiff may file an amended 8 JOINT STIPULATION & [PROPOSED] ORDER STAYING CASE PENDING THE MOTION TO DISMISS IN THE RELATED SECURITIES CLASS ACTION 1 complaint. Without waiving any defenses or objections, Defendants shall be under no 2 obligation to answer, move, or otherwise respond to any such complaints while the 3 State Derivative Action is stayed; 4 11. This Stipulation shall not preclude or prevent the Parties from stipulating to, or filing a 5 motion seeking, a court order lifting, modifying, or extending the terms of this 6 stipulation, and any Party’s right to oppose such a motion; and 7 12. The existence of this stipulation, the contents thereof, and any negotiations or 8 proceedings in connection therewith shall not be deemed a presumption, concession, 9 finding, or admission by any of the Parties of any fault, liability, or wrongdoing. 10 11 IT IS SO ORDERED. 12 13 14 January 18 DATED: ________________, 2018 Honorable Judge Jon S. Tigar United States District Judge 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 9 JOINT STIPULATION & [PROPOSED] ORDER STAYING CASE PENDING THE MOTION TO DISMISS IN THE RELATED SECURITIES CLASS ACTION CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE 1 2 I hereby certify that on January 15, 2018, I electronically filed the foregoing with the Clerk 3 of the Court using the CM/ECF system, which will send notification of such filing to the e-mail 4 addresses denoted on the Electronic Mail Notice List. 5 6 7 Dated: January 15, 2018 By: /s/ Benjamin Heikali Benjamin Heikali 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 10 JOINT STIPULATION & [PROPOSED] ORDER STAYING CASE PENDING THE MOTION TO DISMISS IN THE RELATED SECURITIES CLASS ACTION

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?