Crown Castle NG West LLC v. City of Piedmont et al

Filing 23

ORDER REFERRING CASE to Mediation. STIPULATION AND ORDER re 22 STIPULATION WITH PROPOSED ORDER filed by City Council of the City of Piedmont, City of Piedmont. Signed by Judge Edward M. Chen on 1/22/18. (bpfS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/22/2018)

Case 3:17-cv-06595-EMC Document 22 Filed 01/08/18 Page 1 of 2

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11

MICHELLE MARCHETTA KENYON, Bar No.127969
DYLAN CROSBY, Bar No. 299536
BURKE, WILLIAMS & SORENSEN, LLP
1901 Harrison Street, Suite 900
Oakland, CA 94612
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]
HARRIET A. STEINER, Bar No. 109436
[e-mail]
DANA M. VESSEY, Bar No. 280798
[e-mail]
BEST BEST & KRIEGER LLP
500 Capitol Mall, Suite 1700
Sacramento, California 95814
Telephone: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
Attorneys for Respondents/Defendants
CITY OF PIEDMONT and
CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PIEDMONT

12

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

13

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

14
15
16
17

CROWN CASTLE NG WEST LLC, a
Delaware limited liability company,

18

Petitioner/Plaintiff,

19

v.

20

Case No. 3:17-CV-06595 EMC
STIPULATION FOR REFERRAL TO
MEDIATION AND EXTENSION OF
TIME TO FILE RESPONSIVE BRIEF

CITY OF PIEDMONT, a California
municipality; CITY COUNCIL OF THE
CITY OF PIEDMONT, its governing body;
AND DOES 1-10,

21
22

Respondents/Defendants.

23
24
25
26
27
28
83050.00002\30429819.1

STIPULATION FOR REFERRAL TO
MEDIATION AND EXTENSION
CASE NO. 3:17-CV-06595 EMC

Case 3:17-cv-06595-EMC Document 22 Filed 01/08/18 Page 2 of 2

1
2

STIPULATION
Plaintiff CROWN CASTLE NG WEST LLC (“Plaintiff”), by and through its attorneys,

3

Newmeyer & Dillon LLP, and Defendants CITY OF PIEDMONT and CITY COUNCIL OF THE

4

CITY OF PIEDMONT (together, the “City”), by and through its attorneys, Best Best & Krieger

5

LLP and Burke, Williams & Sorensen, LLP, hereby stipulate as follows:

6

1.

The parties agree that this matter is appropriate for early mediation and are

7

optimistic that a mediation may lead to a resolution of this matter, and request that the Court issue

8

an order referring the parties to a court mediation pursuant to Local Rule 6. The parties also

9

agree to hold the mediation session no later than March 9, 2018, pending the availability of court

LAW OFFICES OF
BEST BEST & KRIEGER LLP
500 CAPITOL MALL, SUITE 1700
SACRAMENTO, CA 95814

10
11

mediators; and
2.

In anticipation of mediation and in order to conserve both the Court’s and both

12

parties’ resources, pursuant to Local Rule 6-1(a), the parties agree to further extend the time in

13

which the City has to respond to Plaintiff’s Complaint herein by sixty (60) days, such that the

14

City’s response to the Complaint will be due on or before March 9, 2018. The parties previously

15

stipulated to an initial 30-day extension of time in order to evaluate alternative dispute resolution

16

options. This stipulation does not alter the date for any hearing or deadline set by the Court.

17
18

IT IS SO STIPULATED.
Dated: January 8, 2017

NEWMEYER & DILLON LLP

19
By:/s/ Michael W. Shonafelt
MICHAEL W. SHONAFELT
Attorneys for Petitioner/Plaintiff
CROWN CASTLE NG WEST LLC

20
21
22
23

Dated: January 8, 2017

24

BEST BEST & KRIEGER LLP
By:/s/ Harriet A. Steiner
HARRIET A. STEINER
DANA M. VESSEY
Attorneys for Respondents/Defendants
CITY OF PIEDMONT and CITY
COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
PIEDMONT

25
26
27
28
83050.00002\30429819.1

-1-

STIPULATION FOR REFERRAL TO
MEDIATION AND EXTENSION
CASE NO. 3:17-CV-6595 EMC

Case 3:17-cv-06595-EMC Document 22-1 Filed 01/08/18 Page 1 of 2

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10
11
12
13
14
15

CROWN CASTLE NG WEST LLC, a
Delaware limited liability company,
Petitioner/Plaintiff,
v.

17

[PROPOSED] ORDER FOR REFERRAL
TO MEDIATION AND EXTENSION OF
TIME TO FILE RESPONSIVE BRIEF

CITY OF PIEDMONT, a California
municipality; CITY COUNCIL OF THE
CITY OF PIEDMONT, its governing body;
AND DOES 1-10,

18

Case No. 3:17-CV-06595 EMC

Respondents/Defendants.

16

19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
83050.00002\30431797.1

[PROPOSED] ORDER
CASE NO. 3:17-CV-06595 EMC

Case 3:17-cv-06595-EMC Document 22-1 Filed 01/08/18 Page 2 of 2

1
2
3
4
5
6

[PROPOSED] ORDER
Pursuant to the parties’ stipulation and good cause appearing therefor, IT IS HEREBY
ORDERED as follows:
1.

This action is hereby referred to a court mediation pursuant to Local Rule 6, to be

held by March 9, 2018, pending the availability of court mediators; and
2.

Pursuant to Local Rule 6-1(a), the City has an additional sixty (60) days to respond

to Plaintiff’s Complaint herein, such that the City’s response to the Complaint will be due on or

8

before March 9, 2018.

9

22, 2018
Dated: January
, 2017

UNIT
ED

EDWARD M. RDERED
CHEN
SO O
United States DistrictD
IT IS
E Judge

DIFI

13

RT

14

dward
Judge E

ER

16

n

M. Che

A

H

15

R NIA

AS MO

FO

12

LI

11

NO

LAW OFFICES OF
BEST BEST & KRIEGER LLP
500 CAPITOL MALL, SUITE 1700
SACRAMENTO, CA 95814

10

S DISTRICT
TE
C
TA

RT
U
O

S

7

N

D IS T IC T
R

OF

C

17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
83050.00002\30431797.1

-1-

[PROPOSED] ORDER
CASE NO. 3:17-CV-06595 EMC