Trustees of the Teamsters Benefit Trust v. Leonard Transport, LLC et al

Filing 21

STIPULATION AND ORDER re 20 STIPULATION WITH PROPOSED ORDER re 17 MOTION for Judgment on the Pleadings Under FRCP 12(b)(6) and FRCP 9(b) Requesting Extension of Time to File Oppotition filed by Trustees of the Teamsters Benefit Trust. Signed by Judge Jon S. Tigar on February 5, 2018. (wsn, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/5/2018)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8

SARAH KANTER, SBN 304542
[e-mail]
STEPHANIE PLATENKAMP, SBN 298913
[e-mail]
GEOFFREY PILLER, SBN 127001
[e-mail]
BEESON, TAYER & BODINE, APC
483 Ninth Street, 2nd Floor
Oakland, CA 94607-4051
Telephone:
[phone]
Facsimile:
[phone]
Attorneys for Plaintiffs
Trustees of the Teamsters Benefit Trust

9

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

10

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

11
12
13

TRUSTEES OF THE TEAMSTERS
BENEFIT TRUST,
Plaintiffs,

14
v.

15
16
17

LEONARD TRANSPORT, LLC, PACIFIC
COAST TRANSPORT, LLC, KATHIE
FAUPEL, and MICHAEL LEONARD,
Defendants.

18

Case No. 3:17-CV-06648 JST
STIPULATED REQUEST AND [PROPOSED]
ORDER FOR ORDER CHANGING TIME TO
FILE OPPOSITION TO MOTION UNDER
FRCP 12(b)(6) AND 9(b)
Hearing Date:
Hearing Time:
Courtroom:
Judge:
Complaint Filed:
Trial Date:

March 29, 2018
2:00 p.m.
9
Jon S. Tigar
November 17, 2017
Not yet set

19
20

Plaintiffs and Defendants mutually stipulated, that for good cause related to travel by

21

Plaintiffs’ counsel, an extension of time to file Plaintiffs’ opposition to Defendants’ Motion under

22

FRCP 12(b)(6) and 9(b). Per Court order, Plaintiffs’ opposition is due by February 9, 2018, and

23

Defendants’ reply is due by February 16, 2018. The parties stipulate to request that the Plaintiffs’

24

opposition be due by February 23, 2018. Further, the parties stipulate that Defendants are granted an

25

additional week after the service and filing of opposition papers within which to file an serve any

26

reply papers thereto.

27
28

Pursuant to Local Rule 6-2, the Declaration of Stephanie Platenkamp, filed concurrently, sets
forth the reason for the requested enlargement of time to file the opposition, discloses all previous
1
STIPULATED REQUEST AND [PROPOSED] ORDER FOR ORDER CHANGING TIME
Case No. 4:17-CV-06648 JST

713826.docx

1

time modifications in this case, and describes the effect the requested modification would have on the

2

schedule for the case.

3

Dated: February 1, 2018

BEESON, TAYER & BODINE, APC

4
By:

/s/ Stephanie Platenkamp
STEPHANIE PLATENKAMP
Attorneys for Plaintiffs

5
6
7

Dated: February 1, 2018

8

EMPLOYMENT RIGHTS ATTORNEYS
By:

/s/ Richard Schramm
RICHARD SCHRAMM
Attorneys for Defendants

9
10
11

PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED.

12

February 5, 2018
Dated: ____________________

13
14

_______________________________________
Hon. Jon S. Tigar
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT JUDGE

15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
STIPULATED REQUEST AND [PROPOSED] ORDER FOR ORDER CHANGING TIME
Case No. 4:17-CV-06648 JST

713826.docx