Strike 3 Holdings, LLC v. John Doe subscriber assigned IP address 67.180.248.237

Filing 11

Order by Chief Magistrate Judge Joseph C. Spero granting as modified 10 Ex Parte Application to File Under Seal. (jcslc2S, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/30/2018)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 7 STRIKE 3 HOLDINGS, LLC, Case No. 17-cv-06663-JCS Plaintiff, 8 v. ORDER GRANTING AS MODIFIED APPLICATION FOR LEAVE TO FILE UNDER SEAL 9 10 United States District Court Northern District of California 11 12 JOHN DOE SUBSCRIBER ASSIGNED IP ADDRESS 67.180.248.237, Re: Dkt. No. 10 Defendant. The Court previously granted an application by Plaintiff Strike 3 Holdings, LLC (“Strike 13 3”) to serve a subpoena in order to ascertain the identity of the defendant in this case, then 14 identified only by an IP address. See dkt. 9. The Court ordered that “any name or other personal 15 identifying information of any current or proposed defendant shall be filed UNDER SEAL in all 16 filings.” Id. ¶ 9. Strike 3 has now identified the individual it wishes to name as defendant and 17 seeks leave to file a first amended complaint and proposed summons under seal. See dkt. 10. That 18 application is GRANTED. In addition to filing those documents under seal, however, Strike 3 19 shall also file redacted versions of both documents in the public record, redacting only 20 Defendant’s name and any other personal identifying information. Strike 3 shall continue to use 21 the current caption of the case but may identify Defendant by name in a redacted portion of the 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 amended complaint. Going forward, Strike 3 is instructed to follow the procedure set forth at Civil Local Rule 79-5 for documents that it seeks to file under seal. IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: January 30, 2018 ______________________________________ JOSEPH C. SPERO Chief Magistrate Judge

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?