Strike 3 Holdings, LLC v. John Doe subscriber assigned IP address 67.180.248.237
Filing
11
Order by Chief Magistrate Judge Joseph C. Spero granting as modified 10 Ex Parte Application to File Under Seal. (jcslc2S, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/30/2018)
1
2
3
4
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
5
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
6
7
STRIKE 3 HOLDINGS, LLC,
Case No. 17-cv-06663-JCS
Plaintiff,
8
v.
ORDER GRANTING AS MODIFIED
APPLICATION FOR LEAVE TO FILE
UNDER SEAL
9
10
United States District Court
Northern District of California
11
12
JOHN DOE SUBSCRIBER ASSIGNED IP
ADDRESS 67.180.248.237,
Re: Dkt. No. 10
Defendant.
The Court previously granted an application by Plaintiff Strike 3 Holdings, LLC (“Strike
13
3”) to serve a subpoena in order to ascertain the identity of the defendant in this case, then
14
identified only by an IP address. See dkt. 9. The Court ordered that “any name or other personal
15
identifying information of any current or proposed defendant shall be filed UNDER SEAL in all
16
filings.” Id. ¶ 9. Strike 3 has now identified the individual it wishes to name as defendant and
17
seeks leave to file a first amended complaint and proposed summons under seal. See dkt. 10. That
18
application is GRANTED. In addition to filing those documents under seal, however, Strike 3
19
shall also file redacted versions of both documents in the public record, redacting only
20
Defendant’s name and any other personal identifying information. Strike 3 shall continue to use
21
the current caption of the case but may identify Defendant by name in a redacted portion of the
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
amended complaint.
Going forward, Strike 3 is instructed to follow the procedure set forth at Civil Local Rule
79-5 for documents that it seeks to file under seal.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated: January 30, 2018
______________________________________
JOSEPH C. SPERO
Chief Magistrate Judge
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?