Agans et al v. Uber Technologies, Inc.

Filing 36

ORDER TO CONTINUE BRIEFING DEADLINES FOR DEFENDANTS' MOTIONS TO DISMISS AND TO COMPEL ARBITRATION as to 27 MOTION to Compel and 26 MOTION to Dismiss. Responses due by 2/21/2018. Replies due by 2/28/2018. Signed by Judge William H. Orrick on 02/06/2018. (jmdS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/6/2018)

1 Tina Wolfson, CA Bar No. 174806
2 [e-mail]
Theodore Maya, CA Bar No. 223242
3 [e-mail]
4 AHDOOT & WOLFSON, PC
10728 Lindbrook Drive
5 Los Angeles, California 90024
6 Tel: [phone]; Fax: [phone]
7 Daniel S. Robinson, CA Bar No. 244245
8 [e-mail]
Wesley K. Polischuk, CA Bar No. 254121
9 [e-mail]
10 ROBINSON CALCAGNIE, INC.
19 Corporate Plaza Dr.
11 Newport Beach, CA 92660
12 Telephone: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
13
14 Counsel for Plaintiffs

Daniel K. Bryson (pro hac vice)
[e-mail]
WHITFIELD BRYSON & MASON LLP
900 W. Morgan St.
Raleigh, NC 27603
Tel: [phone]; Fax: [phone]

15 [additional counsel on signature page]
16
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
17
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
18
19

SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION

20
STEVEN AGANS and AUDREY DIAZ
21 SANCHEZ, individually and on behalf of
22 all others similarly situated,
23
Plaintiffs,

24
25

v.

26 UBER TECHNOLOGIES, INC., a
Delaware Corporation, and Does 1-50
27
Defendant.
28

Case No. 3:17-cv-06759-WHO
JOINT STIPULATION AND ORDER
TO CONTINUE BRIEFING
DEADLINES FOR DEFENDANTS’
MOTIONS TO DISMISS AND TO
COMPEL ARBITRATION
Hearing Date:
March 14, 2018
Judge:
Hon. William H. Orrick

29
STIPULATION TO CONTINUE BRIEFING DEADLINES, CASE NO. 3:17-CV-06759-WHO
30
31

JOINT STIPULATION TO CONTINUE BRIEFING DEADLINES

1
2

WHEREAS Plaintiffs Steven Agans and Audrey Diaz Sanchez (collectively,

3

4 “Plaintiffs”) filed the complaint in the above-captioned action against Defendant Uber
5 Technologies, Inc. (“Defendant”) on November 22, 2017 (“Complaint”);
WHEREAS Defendant required an additional thirty days to respond to the

6

7 Complaint, to which Plaintiffs agreed, as a courtesy, and stipulated to continue
8 Defendant’s responsive pleading deadline from December 26, 2017 to January 25, 2018
9 (Dkt. 16);
WHEREAS Defendant filed motions to dismiss (Dkt. 26) and to compel

10

11 arbitration (Dkt. 27) (collectively, “Defendants’ Motions”) on January 25, 2018, which
12 are both noticed to be heard on March 14, 2018;
WHEREAS Plaintiffs filed a motion to stay this action pending their motion to

13

14 consolidate and transfer this action with now fifteen other actions before the Judicial
15 Panel on Multidistrict Litigation, which is noticed to be heard on March 7, 2018 (Dkt.
16 30);
17

WHEREAS Plaintiffs require additional time to prepare oppositions to

18 Defendants’ Motions in light of the time and resources needed to oppose two motions at
19 once and Plaintiffs’ counsel’s briefing deadlines in other matters; and
20

WHEREAS Defendant has agreed that Plaintiffs may, as a courtesy, have an

21 additional thirteen days to respond to Defendants’ Motions, extending Plaintiffs’
22 deadline from February 8, 2018 to February 21, 2018 and Defendant’s reply deadline
23 from February 15, 2018 to February 28, 2018, while maintaining the current hearing
24 date of Defendants’ Motions on March 14, 2018.
25
26
27
28
29

1

30

STIPULATION TO CONTINUE BRIEFING DEADLINES, CASE NO. 3:17-CV-06759-WHO

31

1
2

NOW, THEREFORE, the parties hereby stipulate and respectfully request that

3 the Court enter an order that:
4

1.

Plaintiffs’ deadline to respond to Defendants’ Motions be continued from

5 February 8, 2018 to February 21, 2018;
6

2.

Defendant’s deadline to reply to Plaintiffs’ responses to Defendants’

7 Motions be continued from February 15, 2018 to February 28, 2018.
8
9
10

AHDOOT & WOLFSON, PC

11 Dated: February 5, 2018

By:

/s/ Tina Wolfson
Tina Wolfson

12
13

Counsel for Plaintiffs Steven Agans
and Aubrey Diaz Sanchez

14
15
16

HOGAN LOVELLS US LLP

17 Dated: February 5, 2018
18

By:

/s/ Michelle Kisloff
Michelle Kisloff
555 Thirteenth Street NW
Washington, DC 20004
Tel: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
[e-mail]

19
20
21
22

Counsel for Defendant Uber
Technologies, Inc.

23
24
25
26
27
28
29

2

30

STIPULATION TO CONTINUE BRIEFING DEADLINES, CASE NO. 3:17-CV-06759-WHO

31

ATTESTATION OF FILER

1
2

I, Tina Wolfson, hereby attest that concurrence in the filing of this document has

3 been obtained from each of the other signatories. See Civ. L.R. 5-1(i)(3).
4
5 Dated: February 5, 2018

By:

/s/ Tina Wolfson
Tina Wolfson

6
7
8
9
10
11

ORDER

12
13

PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, AND GOOD CAUSE APPEARING, IT IS

14 SO ORDERED.
15
16
17 Dated: February 6, 2018
18

________________________________
Honorable William H. Orrick
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29

3

30

STIPULATION TO CONTINUE BRIEFING DEADLINES, CASE NO. 3:17-CV-06759-WHO

31