Cline et al v. Reetz-Laiolo

Filing 52

ORDER REGARDING PAGE LENGTH AND BRIEFING SCHEDULE FOR DEFENDANT'S 34 MOTION TO DISMISS Signed by Judge William H. Orrick on 03/07/2018. (jmdS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/7/2018)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 Thomas R. Burke (State Bar No. 141930) Joy G. Kim (State Bar. No. 294841) DAVIS WRIGHT TREMAINE LLP 505 Montgomery Street, Suite 800 San Francisco, CA 94111 Telephone: (415) 276-6500 Facsimile: (415) 276-6599 Email: thomasburke@dwt.com joykim@dwt.com Elizabeth A. McNamara (pro hac vice) Abigail B. Everdell (pro hac vice) DAVIS WRIGHT TREMAINE LLP 1251 Avenue of the Americas, 21st Floor New York, New York 10020 Telephone: (212) 489-8230 Facsimile: (212) 489-8340 Email: lizmcnamara@dwt.com abigaileverdell@dwt.com Michael A. Vatis (pro hac vice) STEPTOE & JOHNSON LLP 1114 Avenue of the Americas New York, New York 10036 Telephone: (212) 506-3927 Facsimile: (212) 506-3950 Email: mvatis@steptoe.com Attorneys for Plaintiffs Emma Cline, The Clegg Agency, and Penguin Random House LLC 18 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 19 FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 20 21 EMMA CLINE, THE CLEGG AGENCY, and PENGUIN RANDOM HOUSE LLC, 22 Plaintiffs, 23 v. Case No. 3:17-cv-06866-WHO ORDER REGARDING PAGE LENGTH AND BRIEFING SCHEDULE FOR DEFENDANT’S MOTION TO DISMISS 24 CHAZ REETZ-LAIOLO, 25 Defendant. 26 27 28 [PROPOSED] ORDER RE PAGE LENGTH AND BRIEFING SCHEDULE FOR MOTION TO DISMISS CASE NO. 3:17-CV-06866-WHO 1 THE COURT, having taken note of the Stipulation Regarding Page Length and Schedule 2 for Briefing on Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss (“Motion”) made by Plaintiffs Emma Cline, The 3 Clegg Agency, and Penguin Random House LLC (“Plaintiffs”) and Defendant Chaz Reetz-Laiolo 4 (“Defendant”), filed on March 1, 2018, HEREBY ORDERS THAT the briefing schedule and page 5 limits for briefing associated with Defendant’s Motion shall be modified as follows: 6  Defendant’s reply in support of his Motion shall be filed on the later of March 26, 7 2018, or three weeks after defendants in the related action Reetz-Laiolo et al. v. Cline et 8 al., Case No. 3:17-cv-06867-WHO file their motion to dismiss the first amended 9 complaint in that action; 10  than 30 pages; and 11 12 13 Plaintiffs’ memorandum of law in opposition to Defendant’s Motion shall be no longer  Defendant’s reply memorandum of law in support of his Motion shall be no longer than 20 pages. 14 15 ENTERED this 7th day of March, 2018. 16 17 18 Hon. William H. Orrick United States District Judge 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 1 [PROPOSED] ORDER RE PAGE LENGTH AND BRIEFING SCHEDULE FOR MOTION TO DISMISS CASE NO. 3:17-CV-06866-WHO

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?