S.P.W. v. City of Oakland et al
Filing
17
ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE. Show Cause Response due by 4/20/2018. Signed by Magistrate Judge Sallie Kim on 4/16/2018. (mklS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/16/2018)
1
2
3
4
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
5
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
6
7
S.P.W.,
Case No. 17-cv-06884-SK
Plaintiff,
8
9
10
United States District Court
Northern District of California
11
ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE
v.
CITY OF OAKLAND, et al.,
Regarding Docket No. 14
Defendants.
12
13
On March 21, 2018, Defendant City of Oakland filed a motion to dismiss and noticed it for
14
a hearing on May 7, 2018. Under Northern District of California Local Rule 7-3(a), the Plaintiff’s
15
response was due by April 4, 2018. To date, Plaintiff S.P.W. has not filed an opposition brief.
16
Accordingly, Plaintiff is HEREBY ORDERED TO SHOW CAUSE why the Court should not
17
dismiss the case for lack of prosecution or grant Defendant’s motion unopposed. Plaintiff’s
18
response to this Order to Show Cause is due no later than April 20, 2018.
19
If Plaintiff seeks to file an untimely opposition brief, Plaintiff must submit a request to do
20
so showing good cause for the failure to comply with the deadline required by the Local Rules,
21
and must submit the proposed opposition brief with the request. If Plaintiff fails to file a response
22
to this Order to Show Cause by April 20, 2018, the Court shall dismiss this case without prejudice
23
without further notice to Plaintiff.
24
25
26
27
28
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated: April 16, 2018
______________________________________
SALLIE KIM
United States Magistrate Judge
United States District Court
Northern District of California
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?