S.P.W. v. City of Oakland et al

Filing 17

ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE. Show Cause Response due by 4/20/2018. Signed by Magistrate Judge Sallie Kim on 4/16/2018. (mklS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/16/2018)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 7 S.P.W., Case No. 17-cv-06884-SK Plaintiff, 8 9 10 United States District Court Northern District of California 11 ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE v. CITY OF OAKLAND, et al., Regarding Docket No. 14 Defendants. 12 13 On March 21, 2018, Defendant City of Oakland filed a motion to dismiss and noticed it for 14 a hearing on May 7, 2018. Under Northern District of California Local Rule 7-3(a), the Plaintiff’s 15 response was due by April 4, 2018. To date, Plaintiff S.P.W. has not filed an opposition brief. 16 Accordingly, Plaintiff is HEREBY ORDERED TO SHOW CAUSE why the Court should not 17 dismiss the case for lack of prosecution or grant Defendant’s motion unopposed. Plaintiff’s 18 response to this Order to Show Cause is due no later than April 20, 2018. 19 If Plaintiff seeks to file an untimely opposition brief, Plaintiff must submit a request to do 20 so showing good cause for the failure to comply with the deadline required by the Local Rules, 21 and must submit the proposed opposition brief with the request. If Plaintiff fails to file a response 22 to this Order to Show Cause by April 20, 2018, the Court shall dismiss this case without prejudice 23 without further notice to Plaintiff. 24 25 26 27 28 IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: April 16, 2018 ______________________________________ SALLIE KIM United States Magistrate Judge United States District Court Northern District of California 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?