Micron Technology, Inc. v. United Microelectronics Corporation et al

Filing 92

ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART DEFENDANTS ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION TO FILE MATERIALS UNDER SEAL. Signed by Judge Maxine M. Chesney on September 14, 2018. (mmclc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/14/2018)

1
2
3

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

4

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

5
6

MICRON TECHNOLOGY, INC.,
Plaintiff,

7
8
9
10

v.
UNITED MICROELECTRONICS
CORPORATION, et al.,

Case No. 17-cv-06932-MMC
ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND
DENYING IN PART DEFENDANT’S
ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION TO FILE
MATERIALS UNDER SEAL
Re: Dkt. No. 82

Defendants.

United States District Court
Northern District of California

11
12

Before the Court is defendant’s “Administrative Motion to File Materials Under

13

Seal,” filed August 27, 2018, and plaintiffs’ response thereto. Having read and

14

considered the parties’ respective written submissions, the Court rules as follows:

15

1. With respect to the Supplemental Reply in Support of Motion to Dismiss, the

16

motion to seal is hereby GRANTED as to the following portions thereof and DENIED as

17

to all other portions:

18

a. Page 1:20 - 21

19

b. Pages 4:27 (beginning with “Micron”) - 5:13

20

c. Pages 5:20 - 6:3

21

d. Page 8:28

22

e. Page 10:13 (beginning with “Separately”) - 10:15 (ending with “-25”)

23

f. Pages 10:24 (beginning with “(a)”) - 11:5 (ending with “35:23”)

24

g. Pages 11:16 (beginning with “Chen”) - 12:1

25

h. Page 12:25 - 27½

26

i. Page 13:3 - 4

27
28

Defendant is hereby DIRECTED to file in the public record, within seven days of
the date of this order, a version of the Supplemental Reply in Support of Motion to

1
2

Dismiss in which the portions identified above are redacted.
2. With respect to Exhibit 2 to the Declaration of Mario Moore [Doc. No. 82-5]

3

(hereinafter “Moore Decl.”), the motion to seal is hereby GRANTED as to the following

4

portions thereof and DENIED as to all other portions:

5

a. Pages 35:21 - 36:21

6

b. Pages 37:1 - 38:13

7

c. Page 38:16 - 24

8

d. Page 44:2 - 16, 20 - 25

9

e. Page 45:3 - 12, 20 - 21, 23 - 25
f. Pages 58:8 - 59:35

11

United States District Court
Northern District of California

10

g. Page 67:1 - 25

12

h. Page 70:1

13

i. Pages 70:20 - 72:1

14

j. Page 72:11 - 13

15

k. Page 79:4 - 25

16

l. Page 80:4 - 8, 18 - 24

17

m. Page 105:1 - 6

18

n. Pages 106:1 - 107:25

19

Defendant is hereby DIRECTED to file in the public record, within seven days of

20

the date of this order, a version of Exhibit 2 in which the portions identified above are

21

redacted.

22
23
24

3. With respect to Exhibit 3 to the Moore Decl., the motion is hereby GRANTED
as to Pages 99:6 - 102:25 and DENIED as to all other portions.
Defendant is hereby DIRECTED to file in the public record, within seven days of

25

the date of this order, a version of Exhibit 3 in which the portions identified above are

26

redacted.

27
28

4. With respect to Exhibit 5 to the Moore Decl., the motion to seal is hereby
GRANTED as to the following portions thereof and DENIED as to all other portions:
2

1

a. Page 34:10 - 13

2

b. Page 37

3

c. Pages 53 - 54

4

d. Page 81
Defendant is hereby DIRECTED to file in the public record, within seven days of

5
6

the date of this order, a version of Exhibit 5 in which the portions identified above are

7

redacted.
5. With respect to Exhibit 6 to the Moore Decl., the motion to seal is hereby

8
9

GRANTED as to the following portions thereof and DENIED as to all other portions:
a. Page 12:4 - 16

11

United States District Court
Northern District of California

10

b. Page 15:6 - 19

12

c. Pages 33 - 36

13

d. Page 53:5 - 25

14

e. Page 87:20 - 25

15

f. Page 88
Defendant is hereby DIRECTED to file in the public record, within seven days of

16
17

the date of this order, a version of Exhibit 6 in which the portions identified above are

18

redacted.
6. To the extent defendant seeks leave to file under seal the entirety of Exhibits 8

19
20

and 15 - 22 to the Moore Decl., the motion is hereby GRANTED.
7. To the extent defendant seeks leave to file under seal Exhibits 1, 4, and 9 to

21
22

the Moore Decl., the motion is hereby DENIED, the designating party, plaintiff, not having

23

identified any portions therein that are properly filed under seal, and defendant is hereby

24

DIRECTED to file said exhibit in the public record with seven days of the date of this

25

order.

26

IT IS SO ORDERED.

27

Dated: September 14, 2018
MAXINE M. CHESNEY
United States District Judge

28
3