Sgarlata v. PayPal Holdings, Inc. et al
ORDER RE: MARCH 15, 2018 HEARING. COUNSEL FOR ALL INTERESTED PARTIES SHOULD BE PREPARED TO DISCUSS HOW TO PROCEED IN LIGHT OF FACT THAT SOLE MOVANT DOES NOT APPEAR TO BE MEMBER OF PUTATIVE CLASS. Signed by Judge Edward M. Chen on March 8, 2018. (emclc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/8/2018)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
ORDER RE: MARCH 15, 2018
PAYPAL HOLDINGS, INC., et al.,
Docket No. 14
For the Northern District of California
United States District Court
Case No. 17-cv-06956-EMC
Counsel for all interested parties should be prepared to discuss at the March 15, 2018
hearing how the case should proceed in light of the fact that the sole movant seeking appointment
as lead plaintiff, Edwin K. Bell, does not appear to be a member of the proposed class because he
only claims to have purchased options for shares. See Compl. ¶ 43 (“Plaintiff brings this action as
a class action . . . on behalf of a Class, consisting of all those who purchased or otherwise acquired
PayPal common shares . . . ”); Pafiti Decl., Docket No. 15, Ex. 1 (notice to investors that case was
filed “on behalf of a class consisting of investors who purchased or otherwise acquired common
shares of PayPal . . .”). The only other movant, Michael Eckert, has withdrawn his application.
See Docket Nos. 10, 18.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated: March 8, 2018
EDWARD M. CHEN
United States District Judge
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?