Sgarlata v. PayPal Holdings, Inc. et al

Filing 26

ORDER RE: MARCH 15, 2018 HEARING. COUNSEL FOR ALL INTERESTED PARTIES SHOULD BE PREPARED TO DISCUSS HOW TO PROCEED IN LIGHT OF FACT THAT SOLE MOVANT DOES NOT APPEAR TO BE MEMBER OF PUTATIVE CLASS. Signed by Judge Edward M. Chen on March 8, 2018. (emclc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/8/2018)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 7 RONALD SGARLATA, Plaintiff, 8 9 10 ORDER RE: MARCH 15, 2018 HEARING v. PAYPAL HOLDINGS, INC., et al., Docket No. 14 Defendants. 12 For the Northern District of California United States District Court 11 Case No. 17-cv-06956-EMC 13 Counsel for all interested parties should be prepared to discuss at the March 15, 2018 14 hearing how the case should proceed in light of the fact that the sole movant seeking appointment 15 as lead plaintiff, Edwin K. Bell, does not appear to be a member of the proposed class because he 16 only claims to have purchased options for shares. See Compl. ¶ 43 (“Plaintiff brings this action as 17 a class action . . . on behalf of a Class, consisting of all those who purchased or otherwise acquired 18 PayPal common shares . . . ”); Pafiti Decl., Docket No. 15, Ex. 1 (notice to investors that case was 19 filed “on behalf of a class consisting of investors who purchased or otherwise acquired common 20 shares of PayPal . . .”). The only other movant, Michael Eckert, has withdrawn his application. 21 See Docket Nos. 10, 18. 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: March 8, 2018 ______________________________________ EDWARD M. CHEN United States District Judge

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?