Foresee Results, Inc. et al v. Auryc, Inc. et al
Filing
79
STIPULATION AND ORDER for Adjournment of Hearing on Motion and Case Management Conference. Signed by Judge Richard Seeborg on 10/3/18. (cl, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/3/2018)
1 SHEPPARD, MULLIN, RICHTER & HAMPTON LLP
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
A Limited Liability Partnership
Including Professional Corporations
JAMES M. CHADWICK, Cal. Bar No. 157114
TENAYA RODEWALD, Cal. Bar No. 248563
JESSE A. SALEN, Cal. Bar No. 292043
379 Lytton Avenue
Palo Alto, California 94301-1479
Telephone:
650.815.2600
Facsimile:
650.815.2601
E mail: jchadwick@sheppardmullin.com
trodewald@sheppardmullin.com
jsalen@sheppardmullin.com
Attorneys for Defendants and Counterclaimants
9 AURYC, INC., JINLIN WANG, FENG SHAO, and
10
AMOD SETLUR
11
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
12
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
13
14
FORESEE RESULTS, INC. a Delaware
Case No. 3:17-cv-06973-RS
Delaware Corporation,
JOINT STIPULATION FOR
ADJOURNMENT OF HEARING DATE
AND CASE MANAGEMENT
CONFERENCE; AND PROPOSED
ORDER
15 Corporation; ANSWERS CORPORATION, a
16
17
Plaintiffs and Counterclaim Defendants,
18
v.
19 AURYC, INC., a Delaware Corporation, also
known as AURYC, LLC; JINLIN WANG, an
20 individual; FENG SHAO, an individual;
21
22
AMOD SETLUR, an individual; DOES 1
through 20, inclusive;
The Hon. Richard Seeborg
United States District Judge
Defendants and Counterclaimants.
23
24
25
26
27
28
SMRH:488021241.1
-1-
STIPULATION FOR ADJOURNMENT
AND PROPOSED ORDER
1
Plaintiffs and counter-defendants ForeSee Results, Inc. and Answers Corporation, and
2 Defendants and counterclaimants Auryc, Inc., Amod Setlur, Jinlin Wang, and Feng Shao have
3 reached an agreement to settle the claims and counterclaims before the Court in this action. The
4 parties therefore jointly request that the hearing on Plaintiffs’ motion for a preliminary injunction
5 and the case management conference currently set for tomorrow, October 4, 2018, at 1:30 p.m.,
6 be adjourned and vacated. The parties expect to submit joint stipulations for the entry of an
7 injunction and the dismissal of all claims and counterclaims with prejudice shortly.
8
IT IS SO STIPULATED.
9
10
Dated: October 3, 2018
SHEPPARD, MULLIN, RICHTER & HAMPTON LLP
By
11
12
13
14
/s/ James M. Chadwick
JAMES M. CHADWICK
TENAYA M. RODEWALD
JESSE A. SALEN
Attorneys for Defendants and Counterclaimants
AURYC, INC., JINLIN WANG, FENG SHAO,
and AMOD SETLUR
15
16 Dated: October 3, 2018
HOWARD & HOWARD ATTORNEYS PLLC
17
By
18
19
20
21
/s/ Andrew M. Grove
PATRICK M. MCCARTHY
ANDREW M. GROVE
RYAN A. ELLIS
Attorneys for Plaintiffs and Counterclaim
Defendants FORESEE RESULTS, INC. and
ANSWERS CORPORATION
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
SMRH:488021241.1
-2-
STIPULATION FOR ADJOURNMENT
AND PROPOSED ORDER
ATTORNEY’S E-FILING ATTESTATION
1
2
As the attorney e-filing this document, and pursuant to Local Rule 5-1(i)(3), I hereby
3 attest that counsel for Plaintiff and Counter-defendants ForeSee Results, Inc. and Answers
4 Corporation, whose electronic signature appears above have concurred in this filing.
5 Dated: October 3, 2018
6
SHEPPARD, MULLIN, RICHTER & HAMPTON LLP
By
7
8
9
10
/s/ James M. Chadwick
JAMES M. CHADWICK
TENAYA M. RODEWALD
JESSE A. SALEN
Attorneys for Defendants and Counterclaimants
AURYC, INC., JINLIN WANG, FENG SHAO,
and AMOD SETLUR
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
SMRH:488021241.1
-3-
STIPULATION FOR ADJOURNMENT
AND PROPOSED ORDER
ORDER
1
2
Based upon the stipulation of the parties, and good cause appearing therefor, the hearing
3 on Plaintiffs’ motion for a preliminary injunction and the case management conference currently
4 set for October 4, 2018, at 1:30 p.m., are hereby vacated.
5
10/3/18
6 Dated: __________________
7
8
United States District Judge Richard Seeborg
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
SMRH:488021241.1
-4-
STIPULATION FOR ADJOURNMENT
AND PROPOSED ORDER
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?