Foresee Results, Inc. et al v. Auryc, Inc. et al

Filing 79

STIPULATION AND ORDER for Adjournment of Hearing on Motion and Case Management Conference. Signed by Judge Richard Seeborg on 10/3/18. (cl, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/3/2018)

Download PDF
1 SHEPPARD, MULLIN, RICHTER & HAMPTON LLP 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 A Limited Liability Partnership Including Professional Corporations JAMES M. CHADWICK, Cal. Bar No. 157114 TENAYA RODEWALD, Cal. Bar No. 248563 JESSE A. SALEN, Cal. Bar No. 292043 379 Lytton Avenue Palo Alto, California 94301-1479 Telephone: 650.815.2600 Facsimile: 650.815.2601 E mail: jchadwick@sheppardmullin.com trodewald@sheppardmullin.com jsalen@sheppardmullin.com Attorneys for Defendants and Counterclaimants 9 AURYC, INC., JINLIN WANG, FENG SHAO, and 10 AMOD SETLUR 11 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 12 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 13 14 FORESEE RESULTS, INC. a Delaware Case No. 3:17-cv-06973-RS Delaware Corporation, JOINT STIPULATION FOR ADJOURNMENT OF HEARING DATE AND CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE; AND PROPOSED ORDER 15 Corporation; ANSWERS CORPORATION, a 16 17 Plaintiffs and Counterclaim Defendants, 18 v. 19 AURYC, INC., a Delaware Corporation, also known as AURYC, LLC; JINLIN WANG, an 20 individual; FENG SHAO, an individual; 21 22 AMOD SETLUR, an individual; DOES 1 through 20, inclusive; The Hon. Richard Seeborg United States District Judge Defendants and Counterclaimants. 23 24 25 26 27 28 SMRH:488021241.1 -1- STIPULATION FOR ADJOURNMENT AND PROPOSED ORDER 1 Plaintiffs and counter-defendants ForeSee Results, Inc. and Answers Corporation, and 2 Defendants and counterclaimants Auryc, Inc., Amod Setlur, Jinlin Wang, and Feng Shao have 3 reached an agreement to settle the claims and counterclaims before the Court in this action. The 4 parties therefore jointly request that the hearing on Plaintiffs’ motion for a preliminary injunction 5 and the case management conference currently set for tomorrow, October 4, 2018, at 1:30 p.m., 6 be adjourned and vacated. The parties expect to submit joint stipulations for the entry of an 7 injunction and the dismissal of all claims and counterclaims with prejudice shortly. 8 IT IS SO STIPULATED. 9 10 Dated: October 3, 2018 SHEPPARD, MULLIN, RICHTER & HAMPTON LLP By 11 12 13 14 /s/ James M. Chadwick JAMES M. CHADWICK TENAYA M. RODEWALD JESSE A. SALEN Attorneys for Defendants and Counterclaimants AURYC, INC., JINLIN WANG, FENG SHAO, and AMOD SETLUR 15 16 Dated: October 3, 2018 HOWARD & HOWARD ATTORNEYS PLLC 17 By 18 19 20 21 /s/ Andrew M. Grove PATRICK M. MCCARTHY ANDREW M. GROVE RYAN A. ELLIS Attorneys for Plaintiffs and Counterclaim Defendants FORESEE RESULTS, INC. and ANSWERS CORPORATION 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 SMRH:488021241.1 -2- STIPULATION FOR ADJOURNMENT AND PROPOSED ORDER ATTORNEY’S E-FILING ATTESTATION 1 2 As the attorney e-filing this document, and pursuant to Local Rule 5-1(i)(3), I hereby 3 attest that counsel for Plaintiff and Counter-defendants ForeSee Results, Inc. and Answers 4 Corporation, whose electronic signature appears above have concurred in this filing. 5 Dated: October 3, 2018 6 SHEPPARD, MULLIN, RICHTER & HAMPTON LLP By 7 8 9 10 /s/ James M. Chadwick JAMES M. CHADWICK TENAYA M. RODEWALD JESSE A. SALEN Attorneys for Defendants and Counterclaimants AURYC, INC., JINLIN WANG, FENG SHAO, and AMOD SETLUR 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 SMRH:488021241.1 -3- STIPULATION FOR ADJOURNMENT AND PROPOSED ORDER ORDER 1 2 Based upon the stipulation of the parties, and good cause appearing therefor, the hearing 3 on Plaintiffs’ motion for a preliminary injunction and the case management conference currently 4 set for October 4, 2018, at 1:30 p.m., are hereby vacated. 5 10/3/18 6 Dated: __________________ 7 8 United States District Judge Richard Seeborg 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 SMRH:488021241.1 -4- STIPULATION FOR ADJOURNMENT AND PROPOSED ORDER

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?