LegalForce RAPC Worldwide, P.C. et al v. LegalZoom.Com, Inc. et al

Filing 83

ORDER DENYING WITHOUT PREJUDICE PLAINTIFFS' MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT; VACATING HEARING. Signed by Judge Maxine M. Chesney on March 14, 2018. (mmclc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/14/2018)

1
2
3

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

4

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

5
6

LEGALFORCE RAPC WORLDWIDE,
P.C, ET AL.,

7
8
9
10

Plaintiffs,
v.
LEGALZOOM.COM, INC., et al.,
Defendants.

Case No. 17-cv-07194-MMC
ORDER DENYING WITHOUT
PREJUDICE PLAINTIFFS' MOTION
FOR LEAVE TO FILE SECOND
AMENDED COMPLAINT; VACATING
HEARING
Re: Dkt. No. 54

United States District Court
Northern District of California

11
12

Before the Court is plaintiffs' Motion, filed February 14, 2018, "for Leave to File

13

Second Amended Complaint." Defendant LegalZoom.com, Inc. has filed opposition.

14

Plaintiffs have not filed a reply. Having read and considered the papers filed in support of

15

and in opposition to the motion, the Court deems the matter suitable for determination on

16

the parties' respective written submissions, VACATES the hearing scheduled for April 6,

17

2018, and rules as follows.

18

Under the Local Rules of this District, a a party seeking leave to file an amended

19

complaint "must reproduce the entire proposed pleading and may not incorporate any

20

part of a prior pleading by reference." See Civil L.R. 10-1. Here, plaintiffs, in support of

21

the instant motion, have not submitted a proposed Second Amended Complaint, nor

22

even explained what proposed amendments they seek to make.

23
24
25

Accordingly, the motion is hereby DENIED, without prejudice to plaintiffs' refilng
the motion, accompanied by a proposed Second Amended Complaint.
IT IS SO ORDERED.

26
27
28

Dated: March 14, 2018
MAXINE M. CHESNEY
United States District Judge