Brown v. Danone North America, LLC et al

Filing 33

STIPULATION AND ORDER re 31 STIPULATION and Proposed Order selecting Private ADR by Crystal Brown filed by Crystal Brown. Signed by Judge Jon S. Tigar on April 30, 2018. (wsn, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/30/2018)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA Crystal Brown, CASE No C 17:cv-07325-JST Plaintiff(s) v. STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER SELECTING ADR PROCESS Danone North America, LLC, et al., Defendant(s) Counsel report that they have met and conferred regarding ADR and have reached the following stipulation pursuant to Civil L.R. 16-8 and ADR L.R. 3-5. The parties agree to participate in the following ADR process: Early Neutral Evaluation (ENE) (ADR L.R. 5) Mediation (ADR L.R. 6) ■ Private ADR (specify process and provider) The parties will agree on a process and a provider within 14 days after the Court issues an order on class certification. The parties agree to hold the ADR session by: Note: Magistrate judges do not conduct mediations under ADR L.R. 6. To request an early settlement conference with a Magistrate Judge, you must file a Notice of Need for ADR Phone Conference. Do not use this form. See Civil Local Rule 16-8 and ADR L.R. 3-5. the presumptive deadline (90 days from the date of the order referring the case to ADR, unless otherwise ordered. ) ■ other requested deadline: Date: April 27, 2018 Date: April 27, 2018 s/ Leslie E. Hurst Attorney for Plaintiff s/ Angela C. Agrusa Attorney for Defendant IT IS SO ORDERED IT IS SO ORDERED WITH MODIFICATIONS: Date: April 30, 2018 U.S. DISTRICT/MAGISTRATE JUDGE Important! E-file this form in ECF using the appropriate event among these choices: “Stipulation & Proposed Order Selecting Mediation” or “Stipulation & Proposed Order Selecting ENE” or “Stipulation & Proposed Order Selecting Private ADR.” Form ADR-Stip rev. 1-2017

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?