Brown v. Danone North America, LLC et al
Filing
33
STIPULATION AND ORDER re 31 STIPULATION and Proposed Order selecting Private ADR by Crystal Brown filed by Crystal Brown. Signed by Judge Jon S. Tigar on April 30, 2018. (wsn, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/30/2018)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Crystal Brown,
CASE No C 17:cv-07325-JST
Plaintiff(s)
v.
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED]
ORDER SELECTING ADR PROCESS
Danone North America, LLC, et al.,
Defendant(s)
Counsel report that they have met and conferred regarding ADR and have reached the following
stipulation pursuant to Civil L.R. 16-8 and ADR L.R. 3-5. The parties agree to participate in the
following ADR process:
Early Neutral Evaluation (ENE) (ADR L.R. 5)
Mediation (ADR L.R. 6)
■
Private ADR (specify process and provider)
The parties will agree on a process and a
provider within 14 days after the Court issues
an order on class certification.
The parties agree to hold the ADR session by:
Note: Magistrate judges do not conduct
mediations under ADR L.R. 6. To request an
early settlement conference with a Magistrate
Judge, you must file a Notice of Need for
ADR Phone Conference. Do not use this
form. See Civil Local Rule 16-8 and ADR
L.R. 3-5.
the presumptive deadline (90 days from the date of the order referring the case to ADR,
unless otherwise ordered. )
■
other requested deadline:
Date: April 27, 2018
Date: April 27, 2018
s/ Leslie E. Hurst
Attorney for Plaintiff
s/ Angela C. Agrusa
Attorney for Defendant
IT IS SO ORDERED
IT IS SO ORDERED WITH MODIFICATIONS:
Date: April 30, 2018
U.S. DISTRICT/MAGISTRATE JUDGE
Important! E-file this form in ECF using the appropriate event among these choices: “Stipulation & Proposed
Order Selecting Mediation” or “Stipulation & Proposed Order Selecting ENE” or “Stipulation & Proposed
Order Selecting Private ADR.”
Form ADR-Stip rev. 1-2017
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?