Simonelli et al v. Fiat Chrysler Automobiles N.V. et al

Filing 29

ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY MOTION SHOULD NOT BE GRANTED AND CASE SHOULD NOT BE DISMISSED. Show Cause Response due by 11/2/2018.Signed by Judge Joseph C. Spero on November 1, 2018. (jcslc1S, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/1/2018)

1
2
3
4

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

5

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

6
7

ANTONIO C. SIMONELLI, et al.,

Case No. 17-cv-07376-JCS

Plaintiffs,
8
v.
9
10

United States District Court
Northern District of California

11

FIAT CHRYSLER AUTOMOBILES N.V.,
et al.,

ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY
MOTION SHOULD NOT BE
GRANTED AND CASE SHOULD NOT
BE DISMISSED

Defendants.

12
13

Defendants have filed a Motion to Dismiss in this case, which is set for hearing on

14

November 30, 2018. Pursuant to the briefing schedule to which the parties stipulated, which the

15

Court approved, see Docket No. 13, Plaintiffs’ opposition brief was due on October 23, 2018.

16

Plaintiffs have not filed an opposition brief; nor has Plaintiffs’ counsel responded to the Court’s

17

inquiry as to the status of the case. Pursuant to Civil Local Rule 7-3(b), “[i]f the party against

18

whom [a] motion is directed does not oppose the motion, that party must file with the Court a

19

Statement of Nonopposition within the time for filing and serving any opposition.” No statement

20

of nonopposition has been filed. Therefore, Plaintiffs are ORDERED TO SHOW CAUSE why

21

the Motion should not be granted for failure to file an opposition and why this case should not be

22

dismissed for failure to prosecute, failure to follow the Court’s scheduling order, and failure to

23

follow the Civil Local Rules. Plaintiffs shall a response brief to this OSC Order, or in the

24

alternative, a statement of nonopposition to the pending motion, no later than November 2, 2015.

25
26
27
28

IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated: November 1, 2018
______________________________________
JOSEPH C. SPERO
Chief Magistrate Judge