Fareed Sepehry-Fard v. Federal State and Local Corpora Ficta Employees et al

Filing 6

ORDER DENYING FILING. Signed by Judge James Donato on 5/22/2017. (jdlc1S, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/22/2017)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 7 FAREED SEPEHRY-FARD, Plaintiff, 8 9 10 United States District Court Northern District of California 11 Case No. 17-mc-80061-JD ORDER DENYING FILING v. FEDERAL, STATE AND LOCAL CORPORA FICTA EMPLOYEE(S), et al., Defendants. 12 13 On March 10, 2015, Judge Lucy Koh of this court entered an order finding pro se plaintiff 14 Fareed Sepehry-Fard to be a vexatious litigant. Fareed Sepehry-Fard v. Select Portfolio 15 Servicing, Inc., et al., Case No. 14-cv-05142 (N.D. Cal. 2015), Dkt. No. 58. The order was in 16 response to eight separate foreclosure-related lawsuits concerning two properties that Sepehry- 17 Fard owned in Saratoga, California. Id. at 14. Judge Koh handled the eighth lawsuit and 18 dismissed it on res judicata grounds without leave to amend. Id. at 10. The vexatious litigant 19 portion of the order states that plaintiff “must submit for pre-filing review any complaint filed in 20 this district concerning the foreclosure” of his property located at 18314 Baylor Avenue, Saratoga, 21 California 95070. Id. at 21. It further states that if the general duty judge assigned to pre-filing 22 review determines that the complaint is duplicative of these claims or frivolous, it will not be filed 23 and will be returned to plaintiff. Id. 24 On May 15, 2017, Sepehry-Fard lodged five documents with the clerk. One document is 25 formatted like a complaint and states that it is a “bill for $1,412,514,261.78 [f]or striking against 26 the constitutional form of government.” Dkt. No. 1. It names more than fifty defendants, 27 including Judge Koh and a United States Senator for California. Three of the documents are 28 forms purporting to “fire” the President, Vice President and all civil officers of the United States. 1 Dkt. Nos. 2, 3, 4. The fifth is entitled an “Oath on Admission,” also attacking government 2 officials. Dkt. No. 5. 3 All of these documents are frivolous on their face, and one expressly states that Sepehry- 4 Fard is suing “because of grand theft of [his] properties.” Dkt. No. 1 at 8. They fall within the 5 ambit of the vexatious litigant order, and the Clerk of the Court is directed not to accept any of the 6 five documents for filing. 7 8 IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: May 22, 2017 9 10 JAMES DONATO United States District Judge United States District Court Northern District of California 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?