Fareed Sepehry-Fard v. Federal State and Local Corpora Ficta Employees et al

Filing 6

ORDER DENYING FILING. Signed by Judge James Donato on 5/22/2017. (jdlc1S, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/22/2017)

1
2
3
4

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

5

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

6
7

FAREED SEPEHRY-FARD,
Plaintiff,

8
9
10

United States District Court
Northern District of California

11

Case No. 17-mc-80061-JD
ORDER DENYING FILING

v.
FEDERAL, STATE AND LOCAL
CORPORA FICTA EMPLOYEE(S), et al.,
Defendants.

12
13

On March 10, 2015, Judge Lucy Koh of this court entered an order finding pro se plaintiff

14

Fareed Sepehry-Fard to be a vexatious litigant. Fareed Sepehry-Fard v. Select Portfolio

15

Servicing, Inc., et al., Case No. 14-cv-05142 (N.D. Cal. 2015), Dkt. No. 58. The order was in

16

response to eight separate foreclosure-related lawsuits concerning two properties that Sepehry-

17

Fard owned in Saratoga, California. Id. at 14. Judge Koh handled the eighth lawsuit and

18

dismissed it on res judicata grounds without leave to amend. Id. at 10. The vexatious litigant

19

portion of the order states that plaintiff “must submit for pre-filing review any complaint filed in

20

this district concerning the foreclosure” of his property located at 18314 Baylor Avenue, Saratoga,

21

California 95070. Id. at 21. It further states that if the general duty judge assigned to pre-filing

22

review determines that the complaint is duplicative of these claims or frivolous, it will not be filed

23

and will be returned to plaintiff. Id.

24

On May 15, 2017, Sepehry-Fard lodged five documents with the clerk. One document is

25

formatted like a complaint and states that it is a “bill for $1,412,514,261.78 [f]or striking against

26

the constitutional form of government.” Dkt. No. 1. It names more than fifty defendants,

27

including Judge Koh and a United States Senator for California. Three of the documents are

28

forms purporting to “fire” the President, Vice President and all civil officers of the United States.

1

Dkt. Nos. 2, 3, 4. The fifth is entitled an “Oath on Admission,” also attacking government

2

officials. Dkt. No. 5.

3

All of these documents are frivolous on their face, and one expressly states that Sepehry-

4

Fard is suing “because of grand theft of [his] properties.” Dkt. No. 1 at 8. They fall within the

5

ambit of the vexatious litigant order, and the Clerk of the Court is directed not to accept any of the

6

five documents for filing.

7
8

IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated: May 22, 2017

9
10
JAMES DONATO
United States District Judge

United States District Court
Northern District of California

11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2