Wade v. Chao

Filing 11

ORDER RE PRE-FILING REVIEW OF COMPLAINT re 10 Received Document filed by E. K. Wade, 4 Received Document filed by E. K. Wade Signed by Judge Alsup on 9/18/2017. (whalc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/18/2017) (Additional attachment(s) added on 9/18/2017: # 1 Certificate/Proof of Service) (tlS, COURT STAFF).

1
2
3
4
5
6

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

7
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
8
9
E. K. WADE,

11
For the Northern District of California

United States District Court

10

12
13

Plaintiff,

No. C 17-80094 WHA

v.
ELAINE CHAO et al.,

14

ORDER RE PRE-FILING
REVIEW OF COMPLAINT

Defendants.
/

15
16

The Court has reviewed plaintiff E.K. Wade’s new complaint (filed twice) in Wade v.

17

Chao, et al., No. 3:17-mc-80094-WHA (Dkt. Nos. 4, 10), and finds its contents are frivolous

18

and repetitive of past filings in plaintiff’s prolonged series of lawsuits against Elaine Chao (the

19

former Secretary of Labor), and the United States Department of Labor. Accordingly,

20

pursuant to the pre-filing review order issued on June 24, 2010, in Wade v. Gilliland, et al.,

21

No. 3:10-cv-00425-WHA (Dkt. No. 100), the Clerk is directed not to accept the new complaint

22

for filing. Plaintiff’s concurrent motions for leave to file a fifth amended complaint, and motion

23

to amend fifth amended complaint are DENIED AS MOOT. The Clerk shall please CLOSE THE

24

FILE.

25
26

IT IS SO ORDERED.

27
28

Dated: September 18, 2017.

WILLIAM ALSUP
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE