Cabebe v. Nissan of North America, Inc.
Filing
57
ORDER granting 56 STIPULATION Regarding Briefing Schedule and Hearing Date On Motion to Dismiss. Briefing deadlines and hearing VACATED. Signed by Judge William H. Orrick on 05/06/2019. (jmdS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/6/2019)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
GREENSTONE LAW APC
Mark S. Greenstone (#199606)
1925 Century Park East, Suite 2100
Los Angeles, CA 90067
Telephone: (310) 201-9156
Facsimile: (310) 201-9160
Email: mgreenstone@greenstonelaw.com
GLANCY PRONGAY & MURRAY LLP
Lionel Z. Glancy (#134180)
Marc L. Godino (#182689)
Stan Karas (#222402)
Danielle L. Manning (#313272)
1925 Century Park East, Suite 2100
Los Angeles, California 90067
Telephone: (310) 201-9150
Facsimile: (310) 201-9160
Email: info@glancylaw.com
Attorneys for Plaintiffs
[Additional Counsel Listed on Signature Page]
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
14
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
15
SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION
16
21
ELISA CABEBE, HILLARY DICK, ISRAEL
CHIA, ALEXANDRA MCCULLOUGH,
MONTELL JONES, KEVIN BURKE,
ARNIKA IRELAND, JEANINE INGRASSIA,
SEIJI SILER-HYATTE, LASHANDRIKA
WILLIAMS, LAURA WINDOM, and
MICHAEL KANZLER, Individually and On
Behalf of a Class of Similarly Situated
Individuals,
22
Plaintiffs,
17
18
19
20
23
24
25
Case No. 3:18-cv-00144-WHO
STIPULATION AND
ORDER REGARDING BRIEFING
SCHEDULE AND HEARING DATE ON
DEFENDANT’S MOTION TO DISMISS
PORTIONS OF PLAINTIFFS’
SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT;
DECLARATION OF MARK S.
GREENSTONE IN SUPPORT
v.
NISSAN OF NORTH AMERICA, INC.,
Defendant.
26
27
28
STIPULATION AND ORDER RE MTD
BRIEFING SCHEDULE AND HEARING DATE;
GREENSTONE DECL.
CASE NO. 3:18-CV-00144-WHO
1
Pursuant to Local Rule 6-1(b) and 6-2, Plaintiffs Elisa Cabebe, Hillary Dick, Israel Chia,
2
Alexandra McCullough, Montell Jones, Kevin Burke, Arnika Ireland, Jeanine Ingrassia, Seiji
3
Siler-Hyatte, Lashandrika Williams, Laura Windom, and Michael Kanzler (“Plaintiffs”) and
4
Defendant Nissan North America, Inc. (“Defendant”) (collectively, the “Parties”), hereby submit
5
this Stipulation and [Proposed] Order Regarding Briefing Schedule and Hearing Date on
6
Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss Portions of Plaintiffs’ Second Amended Complaint.
7
8
9
10
WHEREAS Plaintiff Elisa Cabebe filed the within action on January 8, 2018 and served
her Complaint on January 24, 2018;
WHEREAS the Court granted two previous stipulated requests extending Defendant’s
responsive pleading deadline (ECF 16 and ECF 20);
11
WHEREAS Defendant filed a Motion to Dismiss on March 7, 2018 (ECF 21);
12
WHEREAS on March 29, 2018 the Court granted the Parties’ Joint Stipulation to extend
13
the deadline for Plaintiff Cabebe to file an Amended Complaint, set a briefing Schedule, and to
14
continue the Case Management Conference (“CMC”) (ECF 26);
15
16
17
18
WHEREAS Plaintiff Cabebe filed a First Amended Class Action Complaint on April 19,
2018, adding Plaintiffs Dick, Chia, and McCullough (ECF 28);
WHEREAS on May 9, 2018, NNA filed its Motion to Dismiss Portions of Plaintiffs’ First
Amended Complaint (ECF 31);
19
WHEREAS on October 26, 2018, while NNA’s motion to dismiss was still pending, the
20
Court approved a Joint Stipulation extending the deadline for Plaintiffs Cabebe, Dick, Chia, and
21
McCullough to file a Second Amended Complaint until 21 Days after the Order on the pending
22
Motion to Dismiss (ECF 44) and later that day granted in part and denied in part Defendant’s
23
Motion to Dismiss (ECF 45) and therein set a deadline of November 15, 2018 for Plaintiffs to file
24
a Second Amended Complaint (“SAC”);
25
WHEREAS on November 9, 2018, in light of Plaintiffs’ representation that Plaintiffs were
26
adding additional class representatives from multiple states, the Parties filed a Joint Stipulation
27
Extending the Deadline to File the SAC and Setting a Briefing Schedule Thereto (ECF 46);
28
STIPULATION AND ORDER RE MTD
BRIEFING SCHEDULE AND HEARING DATE;
GREENSTONE DECL.
-2-
CASE NO. 3:18-CV-00144-WHO
1
WHEREAS on January 2, 2019 the Parties filed a Joint Case Management Statement and
2
therein requested further extensions of the briefing schedule related to Plaintiffs’ SAC (ECF 50).
3
The extensions were requested in light of the fact that Plaintiffs’ SAC added class representatives
4
from six additional states, and multiple additional related claims.
5
6
7
8
9
WHEREAS on January 8, 2019, the Parties attended a further CMC and thereafter the
Court issued an order approving the Parties’ requested briefing schedule (ECF 51);
WHEREAS on February 1, 2019, Defendant filed a Motion to Dismiss Portions of
Plaintiffs’ Second Amended Complaint (ECF 52);
WHEREAS on April 8, 2019, the Parties filed a Joint Stipulation Extending Case
10
Management Conference, Briefing Schedule and Hearing Date on Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss
11
(ECF 53), which was approved by the Court on April 9, 2019 (ECF 54), and which extended the
12
deadline for Plaintiffs’ opposition to May 3, 2019, extended the deadline for Defendant’s reply to
13
May 28, 2019, and continued the CMC and hearing to June 12, 2019;
14
WHEREAS, due to ongoing activities in the case, the Parties agree that the current
15
briefing deadlines should be deferred, the hearing should be taken off calendar, and the dates for
16
briefing and hearing should be addressed at the June 12, 2019 CMC;
17
WHEREAS no previous continuances have been sought other than those described herein;
18
WHEREAS the continuance sought herein will not impact any other case deadlines.
19
THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by the parties through their respective
20
21
counsel, subject to court approval, as follows:
1.
The May 3, 2019 deadline for Plaintiffs’ Opposition to Defendants’ Motion to
22
Dismiss Portions of Plaintiffs’ Second Amended Complaint shall be extended to a new date to be
23
determined at the June 12, 2019 CMC;
24
25
26
27
28
2.
The May 28, 2019 deadline for Defendant’s Reply in support of its Motion to
Dismiss shall be extended to a new date to be determined at the June 12, 2019 CMC;
3.
The June 12, 2019 hearing on Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss shall be taken off
calendar and re-set for a new date to be determined at the June 12, 2019 CMC.
STIPULATION AND ORDER RE MTD
BRIEFING SCHEDULE AND HEARING DATE;
GREENSTONE DECL.
-3-
CASE NO. 3:18-CV-00144-WHO
1
2
IT IS SO STIPULATED.
Dated: May 1, 2019
3
GREENSTONE LAW APC
By:
4
5
s/ Mark S. Greenstone
Mark S. Greenstone
GLANCY PRONGAY & MURRAY LLP
6
By: s/ Marc L. Godino
Lionel Z. Glancy
Marc L. Godino
Stan Karas
Danielle L. Manning
7
8
9
Attorneys for Plaintiffs
10
11
Dated: May 1, 2019
12
DRINKER BIDDLE & REATH LLP
13
By: /s/ Paul J. Riehle
Paul J Riehle
Matthew J. Adler
E. Paul Cauley Jr. (admitted pro hac vice)
14
15
16
Attorneys for Defendant
NISSAN NORTH AMERICA, INC.
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
STIPULATION AND ORDER RE MTD
BRIEFING SCHEDULE AND HEARING DATE;
GREENSTONE DECL.
-4-
CASE NO. 3:18-CV-00144-WHO
1
Attestation Pursuant to Civil Local Rule 5-1(i)
2
Pursuant to Civil Local Rule 5-1(i), I, Mark S. Greenstone, hereby attest that I have
3
4
5
obtained concurrence in the filing of this document from the other signatory to this document.
I declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the United States of America that the
foregoing is true and correct. Executed this 1st day of May, 2019 in Los Angeles, California.
6
By: s/ Mark S. Greenstone
Mark S. Greenstone
7
8
9
10
PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED.
11
12
Dated: May 6, 2019
The Honorable William H. Orrick
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
STIPULATION AND ORDER RE MTD
BRIEFING SCHEDULE AND HEARING DATE;
GREENSTONE DECL.
-5-
CASE NO. 3:18-CV-00144-WHO
1
DECLARATION OF MARK S. GREENSTONE
2
I, MARK S. GREENSTONE, hereby declare:
3
1.
I am an attorney duly licensed to practice law before all of the courts of the State
4
of California and I am admitted to practice in the United States District Court for the Northern
5
District of California. I am the founding principle of the law firm Greenstone Law APC, and
6
counsel of record for Plaintiffs in the above-entitled action. Pursuant to Civil L.R. 6-2, I make
7
this Declaration in support of Plaintiffs Elisa Cabebe, Hillary Dick, Israel Chia, Alexandra
8
McCullough, Montell Jones, Kevin Burke, Arnika Ireland, Jeanine Ingrassia, Seiji Siler-Hyatte,
9
Lashandrika Williams, Laura Windom, and Michael Kanzler (“Plaintiffs”) and Defendant Nissan
10
North America, Inc. (“Defendant”) (collectively, the “Parties”), Stipulation and [Proposed] Order
11
Regarding Briefing Schedule and Hearing Date on Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss Portions of
12
Plaintiffs’ Second Amended Complaint. I have personal knowledge of the matters stated herein
13
and, if called upon, I could and would competently testify to them.
14
2.
Pursuant to the Court’s Order (ECF 54), Plaintiffs’ Opposition to Defendant’s
15
pending Motion to Dismiss portions of the Second Amended Complaint (“SAC”) is due May 3,
16
2019. Defendant’s Reply is due on May 28, 2019. The hearing is set for June 12, 2019.
17
However, due to ongoing activities in the case, the Parties agree that the current briefing
18
deadlines should be deferred, the hearing should be taken off calendar, and the dates for briefing
19
and hearing should be addressed at the June 12, 2019 Case Management Conference.
20
21
22
23
3.
The continuance requested herein will not otherwise impact any other deadlines in
the case.
I declare under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct. Executed this 1st
day of May, 2019, in Los Angeles, California.
24
s/ Mark S. Greenstone
Mark S. Greenstone
25
26
27
28
STIPULATION AND ORDER RE MTD
BRIEFING SCHEDULE AND HEARING DATE;
GREENSTONE DECL.
-6-
CASE NO. 3:18-CV-00144-WHO
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?