Cheehy v. Ekso Bionics Holdings, Inc. et al
Filing
45
STIPULATION AND ORDER DISMISSING CASE. Signed by Judge Charles R. Breyer on 12/4/2018. (lsS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/4/2018)
1 Lionel Z. Glancy (SBN 134180)
Robert V. Prongay (SBN 270796)
2 Lesley F. Portnoy (SBN 304851)
GLANCY PRONGAY & MURRAY LLP
3 1925 Century Park East, Suite 2100
Los Angeles, California 90067
4 Telephone: (310) 201-9150
Facsimile: (310) 201-9160
5 Email: info@glancylaw.com
6 THE ROSEN LAW FIRM, P.A.
Laurence M. Rosen (SBN 219683)
7 355 South Grand Avenue, Suite 2450
Los Angeles, CA 90071
8 Telephone: (213) 785-2610
9 Email: lrosen@rosenlegal.com
10 Co-Lead Counsel for Plaintiff and Class
11
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
12
13
STEVEN G. CHEEHY, Individually and on
Behalf of All Others Similarly Situated,
14
16
17
CLASS ACTION
Plaintiff,
15
Case No: 3:18-cv-00212-CRB
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED]
ORDER DISMISSING CASE
v.
EKSO BIONICS HOLDINGS, INC.,
THOMAS LOOBY, and MAXIMILLIAN
SCHEDER-BIESCHIN,
18
Defendants.
19
20
21
Lead Plaintiff James Myers (“Myers”) and Defendants Ekso Bionics Holdings, Inc.,
22 Thomas Looby, and Maximilian Scheder-Bieschin (“Defendants”), by and through their
23 undersigned counsel, hereby agree and stipulate as follows:
24
RECITALS
25
WHEREAS, on January 10, 2018, Plaintiff Steven G. Cheehy (“Cheehy”) commenced the
26 above-captioned action, (the “Cheehy Action”), against Defendants.
27
28
397864.1
STIP. & [PROPOSED] ORDER DISMISSING CASE
Case No: 3:18-cv-00212-CRB
1
WHEREAS, on January 2, 2018, Rimon Bekhet (“Bekhet”) filed an action, captioned
2 Bekhet v. Ekso Bionics Holdings, Inc., No. 1:18-cv-00001 in the United States District Court for
3 the Eastern District of New York.
4
WHEREAS, on June 15, 2018, this Court appointed James Myers (“Myers”) as Lead
5 Plaintiff on behalf of a putative class of purchasers of Ekso Bionics Holdings, Inc. securities.
6
WHEREAS, on August 14, 2018, Myers filed his Consolidated Amended Class Action
7 Complaint against Defendants.
8
WHEREAS, On October 15, 2018, Defendants filed a Motion to Dismiss Lead Plaintiff’s
9 Consolidated Amended Complaint (Dkt. No. 43);
10
NOW THEREFORE, the Parties hereby STIPULATE and AGREE as follows:
11
1.
Myers will forego filing an opposition to Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss Lead
12 Plaintiff’s Consolidated Amended Complaint.
13
2.
All parties will bear their own costs and expenses relating to this Case, including
14 attorneys’ fees.
15
3.
This matter is dismissed with prejudice as to Lead Plaintiff James Myers and as to
16 plaintiffs Bekhet and Cheehy.
17 Dated: November 29, 2018
Respectfully submitted,
18
GLANCY PRONGAY & MURRAY LLP
19
s/ Lesley F. Portnoy
Lesley F. Portnoy (SBN 304851)
1925 Century Park East, Suite 2100
Los Angeles, California 90067
Telephone: (310) 201-9150
Facsimile: (310) 201-9160
Email: info@glancylaw.com
20
21
22
23
24
Co-Lead Counsel for Lead Plaintiff James Myers
25
26
27
28
2
1
THE ROSEN LAW FIRM, P.A.
2
s/ Laurence M. Rosen
Laurence M. Rosen (SBN 219683)
355 South Grand Avenue, Suite 2450
Los Angeles, CA 90071
Telephone: (213) 785-2610
Email: lrosen@rosenlegal.com
3
4
5
6
7
Co-Lead Counsel for Lead Plaintiff James Myers and
Plaintiff Rimon Bekhet
8
POMERANTZ, LLP
9
12
s/ Jennifer Pafiti
Jennifer Pafiti (SBN 282790)
468 North Camden Drive
Beverly Hills, CA 90210
Telephone: 818-532-6499
Email: jpafiti@pomlaw.com
13
Counsel for Plaintiff Steven G. Cheehy
14 Dated: November 29, 2018
MORRISON & FOERSTER LLP
15
s/ Darryl P. Rains__________
Darryl P. Rains
755 Page Mill Road
Palo Alto, CA 94304-1018
Telephone: (650) 813-5600
Facsimile: (650) 494-0792
Email: Drains@mofo.com
10
11
16
17
18
19
20
Counsel for Defendants Ekso Bionics Holdings, Inc.,
Thomas Looby, and Maximillian Scheder-Bieschin
21
22 PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED
23
December 4, 2018
24 DATED: _____________________
25
__________________________________________
The Honorable Charles R. Breyer
United States District Judge
26
27
28
3
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?