Software Research, Inc. v. Dynatrace LLC

Filing 20

STIPULATION AND ORDER re 19 to Extend Dynatrace's Time to Respond to Plaintiff's Complaint filed by Dynatrace LLC. Signed by Judge Edward M. Chen on 3/2/18. (bpf, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/2/2018)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 DUANE MORRIS LLP Karineh Khachatourian (CA SBN 202634) kkhachatourian@duanemorris.com Daniel T. McCloskey (CA SBN 191944) dtmccloskey@duanemorris.com 2475 Hanover Street Palo Alto, CA 94304-1194 Telephone: 650.847.4150 Facsimile: 650.847.4151 Attorneys for Defendant, DYNATRACE LLC 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION 11 12 13 14 15 16 SOFTWARE RESEARCH, INC., Plaintiff, v. DYNATRACE LLC, Case No.: 18-cv-00232-EMC SECOND STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO EXTEND DYNATRACE LLC’S TIME TO ANSWER OR OTHERWISE RESPOND TO PLAINTIFF’S COMPLAINT Defendant. 17 18 19 Pursuant to Civil L.R. 6-1(b), Plaintiff Software Research, Inc. (“Plaintiff”) and Defendant 20 Dynatrace LLC (“Dynatrace”), by and through their undersigned attorneys, hereby state and 21 stipulate as follows: 22 23 24 25 26 WHEREAS, Plaintiff served Dynatrace with the Complaint and associated documents in this action on or about January 18, 2018; WHEREAS, absent an extension, Dynatrace’s deadline to answer or otherwise respond to the Complaint was February 8, 2018; WHEREAS, Plaintiff and Dynatrace agreed to an initial extension to answer, or otherwise 27 respond to the Complaint by 30 days, i.e., to March 12, 2018; 28 WHEREAS, Plaintiff and Defendant agree to an additional extension of time for Defendant DM2\8630566 1 SECOND STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO EXTEND DYNATRACE’S TIME TO RESPOND TO COMPLAINT CASE NO.: 18-cv-00232-EMC 1 to respond to the Complaint up to and including April 5, 2018, so that Defendant can have 2 additional time to investigate this matter and the parties may explore the possibility of settlement; 3 WHEREAS the initial Case Management Conference is currently scheduled for April 19, 4 2018. As such, the parties’ stipulated extension of time will not impact any other court-ordered 5 deadlines in the case. 6 7 NOW THEREFORE, IT IS STIPULATED AND AGREED that Dynatrace’s deadline to answer or otherwise respond to the Complaint is April 5, 2018. 8 DUANE MORRIS LLP 9 10 Dated: March 1, 2018 11 By: /s/ Karineh Khachatourian Karineh Khachatourian Daniel T. McCloskey 12 Attorneys for Defendant, DYNATRACE LLC 13 14 SINGER BEA LLP 15 16 Dated: March 1, 2018 17 By: /s/ Benjamin L. Singer Benjamin L. Singer Evan N. Budaj Attorneys for Plaintiff, SOFTWARE RESEARCH, INC. 18 19 20 [PROPOSED ORDER] 21 22 Pursuant to the stipulation of the parties and good cause appearing, Defendant Dynatrace 23 LLC’s deadline to respond to Plaintiff Software Research, Inc.’s Complaint is hereby continued to 24 April 5, 2018. No other deadlines shall be affected by this Order. IT IS SO ORDERED. S ERED FO Jud R NIA HONORABLE EDWARD M. CHEN n United States dDistrictheJudge rd M. C ge E wa RT 2 O ORD IT IS S LI 3/2/18 NO 28 DATED: UNIT ED 27 RT U O 26 ISTRIC ES D TC AT T H SECOND STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO EXTEND DYNATRACE’S TIME TO RESPOND TO COMPLAINT ER C N CASE NO.: 18-cv-00232-EMCD OF A 25 IS T RIC T 1 2 3 ATTESTATION Pursuant to Civil L.R. 5-1(i)(3) regarding signatures, I attest under penalty of perjury that the concurrence in the filing of this document has been obtained from its signatories. 4 DUANE MORRIS LLP 5 6 7 Dated: March 1, 2018 By: /s/ Karineh Khachatourian Karineh Khachatourian Daniel T. McCloskey 8 Attorneys for Defendant, DYNATRACE LLC 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 3 SECOND STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO EXTEND DYNATRACE’S TIME TO RESPOND TO COMPLAINT CASE NO.: 18-cv-00232-EMC

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?