Software Research, Inc. v. Dynatrace LLC
Filing
20
STIPULATION AND ORDER re 19 to Extend Dynatrace's Time to Respond to Plaintiff's Complaint filed by Dynatrace LLC. Signed by Judge Edward M. Chen on 3/2/18. (bpf, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/2/2018)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
DUANE MORRIS LLP
Karineh Khachatourian (CA SBN 202634)
kkhachatourian@duanemorris.com
Daniel T. McCloskey (CA SBN 191944)
dtmccloskey@duanemorris.com
2475 Hanover Street
Palo Alto, CA 94304-1194
Telephone: 650.847.4150
Facsimile: 650.847.4151
Attorneys for Defendant,
DYNATRACE LLC
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION
11
12
13
14
15
16
SOFTWARE RESEARCH, INC.,
Plaintiff,
v.
DYNATRACE LLC,
Case No.: 18-cv-00232-EMC
SECOND STIPULATION AND
[PROPOSED] ORDER TO EXTEND
DYNATRACE LLC’S TIME TO
ANSWER OR OTHERWISE RESPOND
TO PLAINTIFF’S COMPLAINT
Defendant.
17
18
19
Pursuant to Civil L.R. 6-1(b), Plaintiff Software Research, Inc. (“Plaintiff”) and Defendant
20
Dynatrace LLC (“Dynatrace”), by and through their undersigned attorneys, hereby state and
21
stipulate as follows:
22
23
24
25
26
WHEREAS, Plaintiff served Dynatrace with the Complaint and associated documents in
this action on or about January 18, 2018;
WHEREAS, absent an extension, Dynatrace’s deadline to answer or otherwise respond to
the Complaint was February 8, 2018;
WHEREAS, Plaintiff and Dynatrace agreed to an initial extension to answer, or otherwise
27
respond to the Complaint by 30 days, i.e., to March 12, 2018;
28
WHEREAS, Plaintiff and Defendant agree to an additional extension of time for Defendant
DM2\8630566
1
SECOND STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO EXTEND DYNATRACE’S TIME TO RESPOND TO COMPLAINT
CASE NO.: 18-cv-00232-EMC
1
to respond to the Complaint up to and including April 5, 2018, so that Defendant can have
2
additional time to investigate this matter and the parties may explore the possibility of settlement;
3
WHEREAS the initial Case Management Conference is currently scheduled for April 19,
4
2018. As such, the parties’ stipulated extension of time will not impact any other court-ordered
5
deadlines in the case.
6
7
NOW THEREFORE, IT IS STIPULATED AND AGREED that Dynatrace’s deadline to
answer or otherwise respond to the Complaint is April 5, 2018.
8
DUANE MORRIS LLP
9
10
Dated: March 1, 2018
11
By: /s/ Karineh Khachatourian
Karineh Khachatourian
Daniel T. McCloskey
12
Attorneys for Defendant,
DYNATRACE LLC
13
14
SINGER BEA LLP
15
16
Dated: March 1, 2018
17
By: /s/ Benjamin L. Singer
Benjamin L. Singer
Evan N. Budaj
Attorneys for Plaintiff,
SOFTWARE RESEARCH, INC.
18
19
20
[PROPOSED ORDER]
21
22
Pursuant to the stipulation of the parties and good cause appearing, Defendant Dynatrace
23
LLC’s deadline to respond to Plaintiff Software Research, Inc.’s Complaint is hereby continued to
24
April 5, 2018. No other deadlines shall be affected by this Order.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
S
ERED
FO
Jud
R NIA
HONORABLE EDWARD M. CHEN
n
United States dDistrictheJudge
rd M. C
ge E wa
RT
2
O ORD
IT IS S
LI
3/2/18
NO
28
DATED:
UNIT
ED
27
RT
U
O
26
ISTRIC
ES D
TC
AT
T
H
SECOND STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO EXTEND DYNATRACE’S TIME TO RESPOND TO COMPLAINT
ER
C
N
CASE NO.: 18-cv-00232-EMCD
OF
A
25
IS T RIC T
1
2
3
ATTESTATION
Pursuant to Civil L.R. 5-1(i)(3) regarding signatures, I attest under penalty of perjury that
the concurrence in the filing of this document has been obtained from its signatories.
4
DUANE MORRIS LLP
5
6
7
Dated: March 1, 2018
By: /s/ Karineh Khachatourian
Karineh Khachatourian
Daniel T. McCloskey
8
Attorneys for Defendant,
DYNATRACE LLC
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
3
SECOND STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO EXTEND DYNATRACE’S TIME TO RESPOND TO COMPLAINT
CASE NO.: 18-cv-00232-EMC
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?