Espitia v. Neuschmid

Filing 4

ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE. Habeas Answer or Dispositive Motion due by 3/13/2018. Signed by Judge Maria-Elena James on 1/12/2018. (mejlc2S, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/12/2018)

1
2
3

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

4

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

5
6

RICO ESPITIA,

Case No. 18-cv-00240-MEJ

Plaintiff,
7

ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE

v.
8
9

ROBERT NEUSCHMID,
Defendant.

10

United States District Court
Northern District of California

11
Petitioner, who is in custody, has filed a petition for a writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28

12
13

U.S.C. § 2254.
The Court has reviewed the petition and concludes that it warrants a response.

14
15

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED as follows:

16

(1)

and the Attorney General of the State of California. See 28 U.S.C. § 2254, Rule 4.

17
18

The Clerk of Court shall serve a copy of the Petition and this Order upon Respondent(s)

(2)

Respondent(s) shall then file and serve an answer in accordance with 28 U.S.C. § 2254,

19

Rule 5 and Habeas Corpus Local Rule 2254-6. Respondent(s) shall file with the answer

20

and serve on Petitioner a copy of all portions of the underlying state criminal record that

21

were previously transcribed and are relevant to the issues presented by the petition.

22

(3)

accordance with 28 U.S.C. § 2254, Rule 5 and Habeas Corpus Local Rule 2254-6.

23
24

Petitioner may serve and file a traverse responding to matters raised in the answer in

(4)

Respondent(s) may file a motion to dismiss on procedural grounds in lieu of an answer, as

25

set forth in the Advisory Committee Notes to Rule 4 of the Rules Governing Section 2254

26

Cases. If such a motion is filed, Petitioner shall file with the Court and serve on

27

Respondent(s) an opposition or statement of non-opposition within 28 days of the date the

28

motion is filed, and Respondent(s) shall file with the Court and serve on Petitioner a reply

1

within 14 days of the date any opposition is filed.

2

The Clerk shall serve by mail a copy of this Order and the Petition upon the Respondent

3
4

and the Respondent’s attorney, the Attorney General of the State of California.
IT IS SO ORDERED.

5
6
7
8

Dated: January 12, 2018
______________________________________
MARIA-ELENA JAMES
United States Magistrate Judge

9
10

United States District Court
Northern District of California

11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21

22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2